Markets
markets
Luke Kawa

Institutional investors are the most bullish since the February peak in stocks, and no longer think a trade war is the biggest risk out there

The trade war is over and risk appetite is high.

That’s the message from Bank of America’s September survey of fund managers with $426 billion in assets, who are collectively their most optimistic since February 2025 (an intermediate peak for the S&P 500).

 BofA FMS August

Key to this view seems to be that investors have capitulated on the idea that higher prices on US imports and disruptions to cross-border trade are the top threat to economic activity. “Trade war triggers global recession” was deemed the No. 1 tail risk from the February through August surveys. It’s now No. 4, trailing a second wave of inflation, the loss of Fed independence/US dollar debasement, and a disorderly rise in bond yields.

Positioning among institutional investors is “starting to close the gap to retail investors’ stock allocation,” Bank of America Chief Investment Strategist Michael Hartnett wrote.

BofA positioning

Implicit in this increasing bullishness is a desire for companies to take part in the AI boom and invest for growth and efficiency.

“Asked what companies should do with their cash flow, 39% of fund manager survey investors said they want companies to increase capital spending (the most since Dec’24) while 27% said they want companies to improve balance sheets (lowest since Feb22),” Hartnett wrote.

BofA FMS capex

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Trump’s “impossible trinity” on AI and energy

Everyone loves a good trilemma.

In economics, the most famous of the genre was developed by Fleming and Mundell, which posits that you can only successfully achieve two of the following three objectives: the free flow of capital, a fixed exchange rate, and independent sovereign monetary policy.

George Pollack, senior US policy analyst at Signum Global Advisors, proposed a trilemma of his own to describe the Trump administration’s competing policy aims as a red-hot AI boom devours power and leaves households miffed by rising electricity bills.

He wrote:

“This note flags what we believe to be a simple reality whose salience will continue growing in US politics in coming months: the Trump administration, in its remaining three years will face a trilemma as the nation waits for its energy bet to play out — proving able to achieve two, but not all three, of the following objectives:

-Fulfill AI’s energy-appetite.
-Keep repressing renewable sources of energy.
-Appease American electricity consumers.”

Trump AI trilemma

As for evidence that the Trump administration is taking a fossil fuels-first approach while stunting renewables, Pollack pointed to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which shrinks access to tax credits for green energy, as well as the end to the federal pause on liquefied natural gas export permits. However, it would be “inaccurate and unfair” to blame President Trump’s policies for surging electricity prices in recent months, he added.

While the government has pursued the expansion of nuclear power as a way to solve this trilemma, the long lead times involved are incongruent with a short-term fix.

Palantir reports Q3 earnings results

Palantir climbs toward a fresh record high ahead of earnings report

Traders and Wall Street are waiting to see whether Palantir’s latest numbers after market close today will continue to beat expectations.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.