Markets
Upside down house
So this is a story all about how our markets got flipped upside down (Juancho Torres/Getty Images)
Internal agony

Boring stocks are the only reason the S&P 500 is up in August, and that’s a little scary

So-called low volatility stocks are up a lot while more volatile ones are down. This is not the usual state of affairs.

Luke Kawa

After a rollercoaster ride, the S&P 500 is up about 2.5% over its past 21 days (roughly equivalent to one month in trading time).

But what’s unusual is which stocks have risen and which have gone down.

So-called high beta stocks — those that are supposed to move more than the market does — are slightly lower over this period, with low volatility stocks posting strong gains.

This is not the usual state of affairs. Typically, stocks go up and high beta stocks do better than their low volatility peers.

High beta stocks are categorized as high beta stocks because they tend to behave like the S&P 500 on steroids: the market goes up, they go up by more, and vice versa.

The opposite for low volatility stocks, which are typically the “a little bit softer now” version of the overall market.

If we look just at periods when the S&P 500 is up 1% over a month, only 6% of the time high beta stocks are doing worse versus low vol stocks than we've recently seen.

This odd dynamic may be a function of the unusual market conditions: the sharp decline and furious bounce back. High beta stocks far underperformed on the way down in early August, and have since meaningfully outperformed on the rebound.

In this light, it could reflect timid investors amid still-unresolved jitters on the state of the economy that have been only partially soothed by the high visibility into rate cuts from the Federal Reserve coming soon.

Conversely, you could come to the exact opposite conclusion. Chipmakers are very well-represented in the high-beta stock index at present, and those were a very popular trade that came under outsized pressure during what seemed to be a more technical than economically-driven market tumult.

A market led by low vol has some less-than-stellar implications for near-term returns, though is by no means a harbinger of doom.

The median forward 21-session return for the S&P 500 following periods in which low volatility stocks are meaningfully outperforming high beta stocks during a market rally is 0.8% (versus a 1.2% median monthly increase for the S&P 500).

The skew is also less favorable: for all periods, the 25th percentile 21-day rolling return for the S&P 500 is -1.4% and the 75th percentile return is +3.4%. After low vol-led rallies, the 25th percentile return is -2% and the 75th percentile return is 2.5%.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Lucid cuts 12% of its US workforce in a profitability push

EV maker Lucid announced on Friday it is laying off 12% of its US workforce as part of its efforts to improve profitability.

This is Lucid’s third round of layoffs since March 2023. At the end of 2024, the company said it had 6,800 employees globally.

“This difficult but necessary decision was made to improve operational effectiveness and optimize our resources as we continue on our path toward profitability,” interim CEO Marc Winterhoff told employees in an email published by Business Insider. The company has been without a permanent CEO since February 2025.

Lucid has worked to boost its cash reserves in recent months. Late last year it announced plans to raise $875 million through a private offering of convertible senior notes due in 2031.

“This difficult but necessary decision was made to improve operational effectiveness and optimize our resources as we continue on our path toward profitability,” interim CEO Marc Winterhoff told employees in an email published by Business Insider. The company has been without a permanent CEO since February 2025.

Lucid has worked to boost its cash reserves in recent months. Late last year it announced plans to raise $875 million through a private offering of convertible senior notes due in 2031.

markets

The Supreme Court’s tariff ruling isn’t sweeping relief for automakers, but it isn’t nothing either

The Supreme Court on Friday struck down a significant chunk of President Trump’s tariffs, but the decision isn’t a cause for automakers to fully exhale.

Friday’s ruling relates to tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and not Section 232. The 25% tariffs on automobiles and auto parts were imposed under Section 232, so those tariffs remain in place.

Still, it’s worth noting that automakers including Ford, GM, and Stellantis aren’t completely on the outside looking in. IEEPA tariffs did cover certain machinery, lower-cost raw materials, and components, which account for a small chunk of automaker production costs.

According to the Center for Automotive Research, IEEPA tariffs account for about $250 per vehicle for the big three Detroit automakers, or $902 million in costs. That’s a far cry from the Section 232 tariff impact of $4,240 per vehicle, per the think tank, but it’s not nothing.

The modest bump in auto stocks compared to retailers on Friday reflects the light relief.

Still, it’s worth noting that automakers including Ford, GM, and Stellantis aren’t completely on the outside looking in. IEEPA tariffs did cover certain machinery, lower-cost raw materials, and components, which account for a small chunk of automaker production costs.

According to the Center for Automotive Research, IEEPA tariffs account for about $250 per vehicle for the big three Detroit automakers, or $902 million in costs. That’s a far cry from the Section 232 tariff impact of $4,240 per vehicle, per the think tank, but it’s not nothing.

The modest bump in auto stocks compared to retailers on Friday reflects the light relief.

markets

Nvidia nears $30 billion investment in OpenAI’s funding round, the FT reports

Nvidia is close to investing $30 billion in OpenAI as part of its long-discussed funding round, per the Financial Times.

Bloomberg had previously reported that Nvidia would be investing $20 billion in this round.

The FT says that this investment will effectively be replacing a bigger planned pact between the two companies. The Wall Street Journal had originally reported in late January that Nvidia’s investment of up to $100 billion in OpenAI, which was announced in September, had “stalled” amid private criticisms of the ChatGPT maker by CEO Jensen Huang.

As Microsoft, SoftBank, or Oracle could tell you, being viewed as overly exposed to OpenAI has not been a boon for stocks in recent months.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.