Markets
markets
Hyunsoo Rim

Michael Burry launches paywalled Substack after de-registering his hedge fund

“The Big Short” investor Michael Burry just launched a new Substack called Cassandra Unchained, after recently de-registering Scion Asset Management from the SEC. One of his first posts takes aim at Nvidia and the topic of the wider AI “bubble.”

Earlier this month, Burry teased on X that he’d be “on to much better things” on November 25. Exactly where his Substack — which he unveiled last night with letters recalling his past warnings, from shorting Amazon in 2000 to Greenspan brushing off a housing bubble in 2005 — fits into that remains to be seen.

The post getting the most attention so far lays out why he sees the AI boom as a bubble rooted in “supply-side gluttony,” Business Insider reports. Burry argues that today’s AI cycle mirrors the dot-com period, when markets were also led by highly profitable giants — the so-called “Four Horsemen” (Microsoft, Intel, Dell, Cisco). The problem back then, according to Burry, was “catastrophically overbuilt supply and nowhere near enough demand,” a dynamic that’s “just not so different this time,” with Microsoft, Google, Meta, Amazon, and Oracle, plus startups like OpenAI, driving massive build-outs that may outstrip real demand.

Burry singles out Nvidia as the modern Cisco, the company at the center of the 2000 dot-com bubble that eventually plunged 78% in the crash. In a recent X post, he also separately accused major tech firms of understating depreciation on their computing hardware, saying it “artificially boosts earnings.”

Earlier this month, Burry teased on X that he’d be “on to much better things” on November 25. Exactly where his Substack — which he unveiled last night with letters recalling his past warnings, from shorting Amazon in 2000 to Greenspan brushing off a housing bubble in 2005 — fits into that remains to be seen.

The post getting the most attention so far lays out why he sees the AI boom as a bubble rooted in “supply-side gluttony,” Business Insider reports. Burry argues that today’s AI cycle mirrors the dot-com period, when markets were also led by highly profitable giants — the so-called “Four Horsemen” (Microsoft, Intel, Dell, Cisco). The problem back then, according to Burry, was “catastrophically overbuilt supply and nowhere near enough demand,” a dynamic that’s “just not so different this time,” with Microsoft, Google, Meta, Amazon, and Oracle, plus startups like OpenAI, driving massive build-outs that may outstrip real demand.

Burry singles out Nvidia as the modern Cisco, the company at the center of the 2000 dot-com bubble that eventually plunged 78% in the crash. In a recent X post, he also separately accused major tech firms of understating depreciation on their computing hardware, saying it “artificially boosts earnings.”

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

SpaceX gets a wave of bullish ratings from Wall Street analysts

SpaceX received more than a dozen positive analyst calls on Tuesday — including from major Wall Street banks — as they initiate coverage on Elon Musk’s space and AI company.

SpaceX went public on June 12 at a $2.2 trillion valuation, the largest debut in history. While the company hasn’t yet posted a profit, it seems to have convinced Wall Street that it will get there and grow its valuation on the way.

Of the at least 17 analysts that gave a rating on Tuesday, all but one gave it a “buy” or “outperform” rating. MoffettNathanson was "neutral."

The ratings come as SpaceX joined the Nasdaq 100 index, a benchmark tech-heavy basket of companies that underpins millions of portfolios. The inclusion adds built-in demand for the stock from index funds and ETFs.

Still, SpaceX fell more than 5% on Tuesday amid a broader sell-off, and is currently effectively flat from its opening price of $150 a share.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.