Markets
markets
Luke Kawa

No Dr. Krugman, the futures curve is *not* a prediction of the future

In a tweetstorm on X talking about President Biden’s reelection chances, New York Times columnist and Nobel Prize-winning* economist Paul Krugman claims:

Krugman is likely referring to a dynamic in the NYMEX gasoline futures market in which there’s a downward trend from the July contract through February 2025. But, you’ll note, there’s also a very clear seasonal pattern.


The futures curve should be taken seriously, not literally. It is not, as the name might suggest, a predictor of where the price will be in the future. The shape of the futures curve sends an important signal as to what producers and traders who hold these commodities in storage should be doing.

Generally speaking, if the futures curve is downward-sloping (or “in backwardation”), it is telling producers that they should be bringing product to market to sell now. If it is upward-sloping (or “in contango”), it is signaling that producers should withhold output or build inventories.

Here’s the monthly evolution of implied gasoline demand (based on the product supplied to market) from 2014 through 2019, to avoid pandemic-related distortions.


That the price on the futures curve is consistently higher for spring and summer months tells you everything about the seasonal pattern of gasoline demand in the US, and much, much less about what the market is “predicting” for gasoline prices. 

In simple terms, the curve goes down because demand goes down. And the shape of the curve is telling suppliers of gasoline how to act to keep the market mostly in balance throughout the year and avoid a lot of price volatility.

*Yes, we know there is no such thing as the Nobel Prize in economics.

Here’s the monthly evolution of implied gasoline demand (based on the product supplied to market) from 2014 through 2019, to avoid pandemic-related distortions.


That the price on the futures curve is consistently higher for spring and summer months tells you everything about the seasonal pattern of gasoline demand in the US, and much, much less about what the market is “predicting” for gasoline prices. 

In simple terms, the curve goes down because demand goes down. And the shape of the curve is telling suppliers of gasoline how to act to keep the market mostly in balance throughout the year and avoid a lot of price volatility.

*Yes, we know there is no such thing as the Nobel Prize in economics.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

SpaceX gets a wave of bullish ratings from Wall Street analysts

SpaceX received more than a dozen positive analyst calls on Tuesday — including from major Wall Street banks — as they initiate coverage on Elon Musk’s space and AI company.

SpaceX went public on June 12 at a $2.2 trillion valuation, the largest debut in history. While the company hasn’t yet posted a profit, it seems to have convinced Wall Street that it will get there and grow its valuation on the way.

Of the at least 17 analysts that gave a rating on Tuesday, all but one gave it a “buy” or “outperform” rating. MoffettNathanson was "neutral."

The ratings come as SpaceX joined the Nasdaq 100 index, a benchmark tech-heavy basket of companies that underpins millions of portfolios. The inclusion adds built-in demand for the stock from index funds and ETFs.

Still, SpaceX fell more than 5% on Tuesday amid a broader sell-off, and is currently effectively flat from its opening price of $150 a share.

markets

Nike sinks to lowest level since 2014 after warning of “challenged” sales environment in Q4 report

Did Nike do it?

Investors had a mixed reaction after the global sports apparel company reported its fourth quarter earnings on Tuesday after the bell. Shares initially rose 5% as Nike beat out Wall Street expectations amid a hefty tariff refund bonus. However, the stock then sank to its lowest level since August 2014 in postmarket trading.

Here are the Q4 numbers:

  • Revenue of $11.0 billion (estimate: $10.8 billion).

  • Adjusted earnings per share of $0.20 (estimate: $0.12).

Ahead of this report, Nike warned that results would be flattered by a one-time tariff refund (now estimated at roughly $0.52 per share for the bottom line). That gave the company an extra cushion in snapping its streak of seven quarters of year-over-year profit declines.

Over the past year, the company had been punished by tariffs on imported goods, stagnant consumer spending, and increasing competition from other footwear brands like New Balance, Adidas, and Hoka.

Outgoing CFO Matthew Friend deemed it an “increasingly challenging operating environment, where sell-through remains challenged.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.