Markets
Arizona Diamondbacks Visit the MLB Fan Cave
Heath Bell of the Arizona Diamondbacks tries out the hamster wheel at the MLB Fan Cave (Thomas Levinson/Getty Images)

RBC hikes S&P 500 price target, sees US stocks running in place through year-end

“Investors have been telling us that they are ready to start pricing in 2026,” Chief US Equity Strategist Lori Calvasina wrote.

Luke Kawa
7/14/25 7:27AM

RBC Capital Markets is lifting its 2025 price target for the S&P 500 to 6,250 from 5,730.

But unlike Goldman Sachs and Bank of America, whose strategists also recently upgraded their price targets on the benchmark US stock index and see the rally continuing, RBC’s view implies that stocks will effectively go nowhere through year-end. (The S&P 500 closed just above 6,280 on July 11.)

Chief US Equity Strategist Lori Calvasina noted that the five models the team uses to come up with this price target have a very wide range: from a low of 5,700 to a high of 6,500.

In a year where trade policy has been both volatile and a major driver of price action, her team no longer finds it appropriate to try to assess where the S&P 500 will go by making a judgment on whether the political environment is supportive of or detrimental to the stock market.

“In January we were baking in the annual average return when Republicans control the White House and both chambers of Congress, a gain of 11% which we thought was a good way to bake in the idea of the business-friendly backdrop for stocks,” she wrote. “Our more bearish forecasts for 2025 swapped in the S&P 500’s return in 2018 (-6.2%) as a way to approximate the challenges posed to stocks by tariffs and heightened policy uncertainty. Neither approach seems appropriate today, particularly since the S&P 500 is no longer trading in sync with the President’s polling numbers. And, so, we’ve put aside attempts to contextualize the policy backdrop for now.”

The key change underpinning RBC’s rosier stance is below (emphasis added):

Most importantly, we’ve adjusted our way of thinking about the economic signal for the stock market. As was the case in our prior forecast, we are baking in the idea that the S&P 500 tends to fall -3.4% during years that see real GDP in the 1.1-2% range (RBC Economics and consensus are both looking for real GDP of 1.5% in 2025). But investors have been telling us that they are ready to start pricing in 2026. While it seems early to us to do so, we think it’s important to be mindful of this shift in investor focus, and so we’ve added in a second GDP test that bakes in how stocks perform in years that precede real GDP in the 1.1-2% range. Both RBC Economics and consensus anticipate another year like this in 2026, with RBC Economics’ forecast coming in at 1.3% and consensus tracking at 1.6%. In those “prior years” before 1.1-2% GDP occurs, the S&P 500 tends to gain about 8% on a full year basis, math that pegs fair value for the index in Dec 2025 at 6,352. Adding in this new way of looking at the GDP signal, and removing our policy assumption, was the biggest contributor to the change in our forecast today.

It’s admittedly a very peculiar situation. To sum up RBC’s position, years like this year from a growth standpoint are generally poor for the S&P 500; growth this year is expected to be similar to growth next year, but since the years before slower-growth years tend to be solid for the stock market, RBC thinks the S&P 500 will hold on to its year-to-date gains.

RBC is simultaneously de-emphasizing the importance of this year by referencing how investors are looking forward to 2026 — a year when their signal would be telling them stocks should be weak because growth is relatively low! — and changing the way they think about how stocks should perform this year by not looking at this year on its own merits, but rather treating it as a year that comes before a year estimated to be a rather sluggish period for economic activity, even though growth in both years is anticipated to be broadly comparable.

Clear? Clear.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Kenvue plunges after reports suggest RFK Jr. may try to link prenatal Tylenol use to autism

Kenvue sank 15% Friday after a WSJ report said Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. may attempt to link prenatal Tylenol use to autism in an upcoming government report.

Kenvue, the maker of Tylenol and formerly a division of Johnson & Johnson prior to a 2023 spin-out, pushed back, saying the science shows “no causal link” between acetaminophen use during pregnancy and autism, and pointed to FDA and medical groups that agree on the drug’s safety.

The FDA itself has found no “clear evidence” of harm but advises pregnant women to consult providers before taking OTC meds.

The report is also expected to float a folate-derived therapy as a potential treatment.

Tylenol is just the latest well-established medication to face scrutiny under Kennedy, who has already stirred controversy by reshaping vaccine policy and amplifying doubts about mRNA shots.

Kenvue shares are now down over 18% year-to-date.

The FDA itself has found no “clear evidence” of harm but advises pregnant women to consult providers before taking OTC meds.

The report is also expected to float a folate-derived therapy as a potential treatment.

Tylenol is just the latest well-established medication to face scrutiny under Kennedy, who has already stirred controversy by reshaping vaccine policy and amplifying doubts about mRNA shots.

Kenvue shares are now down over 18% year-to-date.

markets

Lucid surges following 6 days of losses after headlines misidentify Cantor Fitzgerald’s lower split-adjusted price target as a good thing

It’s been a shortened week, but still a rough one for Lucid. Investor blowback to the luxury EV maker’s 1-for-10 reverse stock split has sent shares to all time lows this week.

After six straight days of closing lower, Wall Street appears to have decided enough is enough and is loading up on Lucid shares on Friday, sending them up 13% in recent trading. As of 2:10pm eastern, Lucid trading volumes were at more than 240% of their 30 day average.

Some of the move could be attributed to traders reading headlines that don’t take into consideration Lucid’s reverse split. Cantor Fitzgerald on Friday slapped a new price target on Lucid of $20, compared to its previous target of $3. Some news outlets (not us!) presented that as an increase. The problem: With the 1-for-10 reverse split in effect, a comparable price target would have been $30. The new $20 target is actually... a cut.

markets

Momentum stocks reverse, weighing on US markets

Momentum stocks dragged the market lower Friday, with stocks like Palantir Technologies, SoundHound AI, Rocket Lab, Robinhood Markets, and GE Vernova continuing a recent slide.

(Robinhood Markets, Inc. is the parent company of Sherwood Media, an independently operated media company.)

The iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF opened 1% higher and built on those gains before reversing hard early in the session to trade 1% lower as of 11 a.m. ET.

If it closes at these levels, this fund that holds US stocks with the best risk-adjusted trailing returns will have completed a so-called “bearish engulfing candle pattern.” As the name suggests is, this is considered to be a negative technical signal that occurs when, the day after a security rises, it ends up opening above the previous day’s closing price and closes below the previous day’s opening price.

markets

US stocks rise as soft job growth fortifies bets on a Federal Reserve rate cut this month

ETFs that track major US stock indexes are higher and short-term yields are falling after the August jobs report continued to confirm the trend of labor market cooling, calcifying bets on a Federal Reserve rate cut this month.

Non-farm payrolls rose by just 22,000 in August, while economists had expected an addition of 75,000. The unemployment rate ticked up to 4.3%, in line with estimates. Revisions to the past two months were also negative, but not as severe as in the July report.

The SPDR S&P 500 ETF was up 0.3% to session highs in the minutes following the release, while two-year US Treasury yields fell below 3.5%.

A report and market reaction like this suggests traders are embracing the idea that the softening in the US labor market is primarily driven by supply-side factors in light of major changes to net immigration, as recently argued by economists at the St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank, and isn’t a worrying sign that the US economy is on the verge of a recession.

With revisions, June’s non-farm payroll growth is now -13,000. That’s the first month of net job losses since December 2020. And the underemployment rate (or U6, which includes the unemployed, those employed part time who want a full-time job, and those who want a job but aren’t looking for one currently) rose to 8.1%, its highest level since October 2021.

Some see this data as much more concerning than the market reaction implies.

“Since a month or two ago, policy hawks, growth bulls (I call them wrong), have been arguing two things. First, sequential growth should perk up because the weakness in the summer was all a function of uncertainty around Liberation Day. Second, focus on the ratios because the unemployment rate is still low,” Neil Dutta, head of US economics at Renaissance Macro Research, wrote. “Both of these views were wrong as we now know. Employment growth is still cooling (there is no uptick in hours either) and the unemployment rate is rising. Bye Felicia!”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.