Markets
Arizona Diamondbacks Visit the MLB Fan Cave
Heath Bell of the Arizona Diamondbacks tries out the hamster wheel at the MLB Fan Cave (Thomas Levinson/Getty Images)

RBC hikes S&P 500 price target, sees US stocks running in place through year-end

“Investors have been telling us that they are ready to start pricing in 2026,” Chief US Equity Strategist Lori Calvasina wrote.

Luke Kawa

RBC Capital Markets is lifting its 2025 price target for the S&P 500 to 6,250 from 5,730.

But unlike Goldman Sachs and Bank of America, whose strategists also recently upgraded their price targets on the benchmark US stock index and see the rally continuing, RBC’s view implies that stocks will effectively go nowhere through year-end. (The S&P 500 closed just above 6,280 on July 11.)

Chief US Equity Strategist Lori Calvasina noted that the five models the team uses to come up with this price target have a very wide range: from a low of 5,700 to a high of 6,500.

In a year where trade policy has been both volatile and a major driver of price action, her team no longer finds it appropriate to try to assess where the S&P 500 will go by making a judgment on whether the political environment is supportive of or detrimental to the stock market.

“In January we were baking in the annual average return when Republicans control the White House and both chambers of Congress, a gain of 11% which we thought was a good way to bake in the idea of the business-friendly backdrop for stocks,” she wrote. “Our more bearish forecasts for 2025 swapped in the S&P 500’s return in 2018 (-6.2%) as a way to approximate the challenges posed to stocks by tariffs and heightened policy uncertainty. Neither approach seems appropriate today, particularly since the S&P 500 is no longer trading in sync with the President’s polling numbers. And, so, we’ve put aside attempts to contextualize the policy backdrop for now.”

The key change underpinning RBC’s rosier stance is below (emphasis added):

Most importantly, we’ve adjusted our way of thinking about the economic signal for the stock market. As was the case in our prior forecast, we are baking in the idea that the S&P 500 tends to fall -3.4% during years that see real GDP in the 1.1-2% range (RBC Economics and consensus are both looking for real GDP of 1.5% in 2025). But investors have been telling us that they are ready to start pricing in 2026. While it seems early to us to do so, we think it’s important to be mindful of this shift in investor focus, and so we’ve added in a second GDP test that bakes in how stocks perform in years that precede real GDP in the 1.1-2% range. Both RBC Economics and consensus anticipate another year like this in 2026, with RBC Economics’ forecast coming in at 1.3% and consensus tracking at 1.6%. In those “prior years” before 1.1-2% GDP occurs, the S&P 500 tends to gain about 8% on a full year basis, math that pegs fair value for the index in Dec 2025 at 6,352. Adding in this new way of looking at the GDP signal, and removing our policy assumption, was the biggest contributor to the change in our forecast today.

It’s admittedly a very peculiar situation. To sum up RBC’s position, years like this year from a growth standpoint are generally poor for the S&P 500; growth this year is expected to be similar to growth next year, but since the years before slower-growth years tend to be solid for the stock market, RBC thinks the S&P 500 will hold on to its year-to-date gains.

RBC is simultaneously de-emphasizing the importance of this year by referencing how investors are looking forward to 2026 — a year when their signal would be telling them stocks should be weak because growth is relatively low! — and changing the way they think about how stocks should perform this year by not looking at this year on its own merits, but rather treating it as a year that comes before a year estimated to be a rather sluggish period for economic activity, even though growth in both years is anticipated to be broadly comparable.

Clear? Clear.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Report: Boeing could unveil 500-jet order from China during Trump’s visit later this month

Shares of Boeing are up nearly 4% on Friday afternoon, following a Bloomberg report that the company could be close to finalizing a deal to sell 500 planes to China.

The deal was first reported in August and would be one of Boeing’s largest ever.

According to Bloomberg’s sources, the deal could be officially unveiled when President Trump travels to China at the end of the month. That trip could be delayed given the war in Iran. The deal, sources say, could still fall apart — similar language to when it was first reported on more than six months ago.

Boeing has been on the outside of the Chinese market, in terms of new orders, since 2019 amid escalating US-China trade tensions.

According to Bloomberg’s sources, the deal could be officially unveiled when President Trump travels to China at the end of the month. That trip could be delayed given the war in Iran. The deal, sources say, could still fall apart — similar language to when it was first reported on more than six months ago.

Boeing has been on the outside of the Chinese market, in terms of new orders, since 2019 amid escalating US-China trade tensions.

markets

Why software shares are withstanding the war jitters

The outbreak of the war in Iran has clearly rattled investors and created a few clear winners — mostly energy stocks — and losers — consumer staples, airlines, and, well, more or else everything else.

But there is one interesting outlier to that Manichaean market dynamic.

Software shares — often the same companies that the market was giving up for dead just a few weeks ago due to overexpectations of an AI-driven disruption — have been holding up remarkably well.

These companies, including Intuit, ServiceNow, Datadog, Snowflake, IBM, Workday, and Oracle, have actually had a pretty decent run since the war started with a combined US-Israeli attack on Iran last weekend.

A new note from RBC Capital’s Rishi Jaluria suggests this isn’t just a fluke. Looking at the performance of software stocks during periods of geopolitical stress and market volatility over the last 10 and 25 years, his team found that software shares appear fairly well insulated when these broader shocks hit. RBC wrote:

“The defensive nature of SaaS models and the mission-critical nature of many core software systems at the enterprise level (e.g., in the absence of mass layoffs that may create seat-based headwinds, geopolitical uncertainty and/or market volatility typically will not cause an enterprise CIO to consider ripping out their ERP, CRM, Cyber systems, etc.”

I briefly got Jaluria on the phone yesterday, and he explained a bit more about why he thinks investors might see software as a decent place to hide out from the current chaos.

“With everything in the Middle East, you have to think about not just oil and gas input prices but also supply chains,” he said. “With software, you’re not really thinking about that.”

In other words, there is no equivalent of a closure of the Strait of Hormuz that software investors have to worry about.

Others suggested that the near-term profitability of these giant software companies — aside from concerns about potential long-term disruption from AI — may look different in the face of the economic uncertainty that seems to be growing with the war, especially after a sell-off that has left them relatively attractively valued.

Mark Moerdler, who covers software stocks for Bernstein Research, says that while the AI worries are clearly real, software companies continue to be highly productive cash cows.

“Everyone is afraid that AI is a massive disruptor, and all these articles you read talk about AI as massive disruptor or the world is ending or whatever,” he said. “You don’t see it in the fundamental numbers of the companies I cover. They are delivering GAAP profits, free cash flow, and they’re good investment ideas.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.