Markets
Federal Reserve Soft Landing
Stick the
Landing
(Photo by ABC Photo Archives/Disney General Entertainment Content via Getty Images)

With the Fed about to cut, is the soft landing on track?

Only one tiny economic analyst has the guts to find out.

Did they pull it off? Or did they pull a fast one?

If the Federal Reserve cuts short-term interest rates next month, as Wall Street thinks is almost certain, it will mark an important milestone in the multi-year debate over whether the economy could experience a so-called soft landing.

The cognoscenti will remember that a recession — the “hard landing” scenario — was widely thought inevitable after the Fed began to jack up interest rates in 2022 to rein in post-pandemic inflation.

Others, including those in the Biden administration and the Federal Reserve, thought it just might be possible to slowly bring inflation back to earth, without crashing the economy. (A deep recession followed the last serious inflationary episode in the early 1980s.)

That magic combination — inflation coming down, without unemployment spiking — was the so-called soft-landing scenario, something few thought likely as the Fed delivered sharpest rise in interest rates since back in the early 1980s.

But, remarkably, with inflation down, the job market strong and the economy expanding, it looks like we may be on track to pulling it off.

But there’s only one purely scientific way to tell for sure.

In honor of the looming 50th anniversary of motorcycle daredevil Evel Knievel’s iconic attempt to ride a rocket-powered motorcycle over a gap in Idaho’s Snake River Canyon, we’ve uploaded key economic data series to Line Rider, the hypnotic old-school browser game.

The main character, a scarfed sled rider by the name of Bosh, is notoriously sensitive to sudden shifts in the trajectory of the lines he follows. In fact, so sensitive was Bosh to the actual numbers, that we were forced to do 1-year moving averages to give him some terrain he could actually traverse.

Even so, you’ll notice that for the most part Bosh’s ride over the last few years of American economic data, is a remarkably smooth downhill cruise that seems soft landing-y.

On the inflation front, the Consumer Price Index — which hit 9.1% June 2022 — has come more or less steadily dow to 2.9%. That looks pretty soft.

Consumer Price Index

The job market, too, seems to have pulled off a return to earth. The jobless rate is up from 3.6% in June 2022 to 4.3% in July, which, while an unfriendly trend, is still well below the average of roughly 6% during the two decades preceding Covid. Initial claims for unemployment insurance — another closely watched job market metric — have also normalized from highly elevated Covid-era levels.

Unemployment Insurance Initial Claims

And the economy as a whole, as measured by GDP, has considerable pep at the moment, expanding at a healthy 3% annualized pace in the second quarter.

But you’ll notice, Bosh has a bit of trouble negotiating a pretty sharp slowdown that hit back in 2022.

Bosh might be onto something here. That divot reflects in part the fact that GDP actually did drop for two straight quarters in early 2022, which is often thought of as an unofficial definition for a recession. 

Gross Domestic Product

Nobody called it a recession at the time, largely because this negative lurch was driven by big swings in trade and inventories, while private sector demand was positive over this period. This was a time of normalization from super strong growth the economy generated in 2021, and all the while, the unemployment stayed remarkably low. 

Also, the National Bureau of Economic Research — which has taken on the role of official decider of what qualifies for R-word status — never declared that it was one. 

Still, at least by the super-sensitive standards of Line Rider, this landing might not have been quite as soft as it appears to us all now.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Oscar Health beats on adjusted EPS by a penny, CEO says it will "return to profitability" in 2026

Oscar Health rose in premarket trading after it reported earnings results that edged ahead of Wall Street expectations by a penny.

The company reported a loss per share of $0.53, compared to the $0.54 loss per share analysts polled by FactSet were penciling in. Oscar reported $2.92 billion in revenue, compared to $3.07 billion analysts expected.

Oscar CEO Mark Bertolini said in a statement that the company is "confident in our ability to expand margins and return to profitability in 2026."

It also reported a medical loss ratio, a key metric which measures how much revenue from premiums is spent on providing care, of 88.5%, a slightly better result than the 88.8% the Street was expecting. Health insurance companies — particularly those that provide government sponsored plans, like Oscar — have had a tumultuous year amid soaring medical costs.

markets

D-Wave Quantum posts Q3 revenue beat

D-Wave Quantum reversed its premarket gains despite reporting better than expected Q3 sales.

The quarterly results:

  • Revenue: $3.7 million (estimate: $3.03 million)

  • Adjusted earnings per share: -$0.05 (estimate: -$0.07)

“Our strong third quarter results reflect the momentum we see building across every aspect of our business, with key metrics, including revenue, gross profit, bookings and cash balance, clearly indicating D-Wave’s success in accelerating global quantum computing adoption,” said CEO Dr. Alan Baratz.

D-Wave ended Q3 with $2.4 million in bookings (that is, its pipeline of expected future sales), but said that number has gone up by $12 million since the end of that quarter. Much of that appears to be linked to an agreement with Swiss Quantum Technology to deploy one of its systems.

The prospect of government support has been a major catalyst for the quantum space in recent months, including the US government deeming the technology an R&D priority, which was followed by a report that the Trump administration was in talks to accumulate equity stakes in D-Wave and its peers. D-Wave had outperformed rivals on this news, as this would have constituted a bigger shift in how the government feels about this annealing-centric quantum company relative to its peers, which focus on gate-based models. Back in May, D-Wave CEO Dr. Alan Baratz told us he “couldn’t even get a foot in the door” with the US government, calling its focus on gate-based models “profoundly disappointing.”

However, that report of direct government investment in quantum computing stocks was quickly contradicted by separate reports.

Shares of quantum computing company peaked at nearly $47 in mid-October, but slumped into the mid-$30 range ahead of this report as part of a broad pullback across many speculative pockets of the market.

markets

Marvell jumps after Bloomberg reports that SoftBank explored a potential takeover of the company earlier this year

Marvell Technology is trading more than 9% higher on Thursday morning after Bloomberg reported that investment giant SoftBank flirted with the idea of potentially taking over the US chipmaker earlier this year.

Citing people familiar with the matter, Bloomberg added that SoftBank’s billionaire founder Masayoshi Son has been evaluating Marvell as a possible target for years, with the idea of combining the company with UK chip designer Arm Holdings, of which it owns a majority stake. Marvell specializes in taking chip design elements, like those offered by SoftBank’s Arm, and bringing them together into final blueprints that manufacturers could put into production.

Per Bloomberg, the two sides were unable to reach an agreement after the Japanese conglomerate made overtures several months ago and are not currently in active negotiations.

Marvell’s stock has shed 18% so far this year, before this latest uptick, in contrast to the massive gains of many of its chipmaking peers.

Citing people familiar with the matter, Bloomberg added that SoftBank’s billionaire founder Masayoshi Son has been evaluating Marvell as a possible target for years, with the idea of combining the company with UK chip designer Arm Holdings, of which it owns a majority stake. Marvell specializes in taking chip design elements, like those offered by SoftBank’s Arm, and bringing them together into final blueprints that manufacturers could put into production.

Per Bloomberg, the two sides were unable to reach an agreement after the Japanese conglomerate made overtures several months ago and are not currently in active negotiations.

Marvell’s stock has shed 18% so far this year, before this latest uptick, in contrast to the massive gains of many of its chipmaking peers.

markets

Snap soars after announcing $400 million deal with Perplexity, strong earnings

Snap shares shot up as much as 25% in after-hours trading after the release of third-quarter earnings that beat estimates, as well as the announcement of a big deal with AI startup Perplexity to integrate its “conversational AI search” into Snap products. Shares have since pared some of those gains, up 16% as of 4:45am ET on Thursday.

Some highlights:

  • Revenue came in at $1.51 billion, up 10% year on year (compared to Wall Street’s estimate of $1.49 billion).

  • Adjusted EBITDA was $182 million (estimate: $124 million).

  • Global monthly active users hit 943 million, up 7% year on year.

  • Perplexity will pay Snap $400 million “over one year, through a combination of cash and equity, as we achieve global rollout” of its conversational search engine within Snapchat.

The company also announced a $500 million stock buyback program.

Some highlights:

  • Revenue came in at $1.51 billion, up 10% year on year (compared to Wall Street’s estimate of $1.49 billion).

  • Adjusted EBITDA was $182 million (estimate: $124 million).

  • Global monthly active users hit 943 million, up 7% year on year.

  • Perplexity will pay Snap $400 million “over one year, through a combination of cash and equity, as we achieve global rollout” of its conversational search engine within Snapchat.

The company also announced a $500 million stock buyback program.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.