Super Micro drops on shareholder lawsuit alleging securities fraud around China chip smuggling
Super Micro Computer fell more than 4.5% at one point in premarket trading Thursday on news that shareholders are suing the company, alleging securities fraud after its cofounder and two others were charged with illegally smuggling chips to China.
The lawsuit follows a US criminal indictment that was unsealed last week and accuses the company’s cofounder, sales manager, and a contractor of illegally diverting $2.5 billion worth of AI servers containing Nvidia chips to China, in violation of US export controls. The initial news sent the stock plunging 33% in a single day, wiping out billions in market cap.
While the company wasn’t named as a defendant in the Department of Justice indictment, it announced its cofounder’s resignation and stated that it’s been “cooperating fully with the government’s investigation and will continue to do so.”
According to the complaint filed in San Francisco federal court and viewed by Reuters, shareholders allege the company inflated its stock by overstating its business outlook, while concealing its significant reliance on China sales and “material weakness” in its compliance with export control regulations.
The lawsuit follows a US criminal indictment that was unsealed last week and accuses the company’s cofounder, sales manager, and a contractor of illegally diverting $2.5 billion worth of AI servers containing Nvidia chips to China, in violation of US export controls. The initial news sent the stock plunging 33% in a single day, wiping out billions in market cap.
While the company wasn’t named as a defendant in the Department of Justice indictment, it announced its cofounder’s resignation and stated that it’s been “cooperating fully with the government’s investigation and will continue to do so.”
According to the complaint filed in San Francisco federal court and viewed by Reuters, shareholders allege the company inflated its stock by overstating its business outlook, while concealing its significant reliance on China sales and “material weakness” in its compliance with export control regulations.
