Markets
TechCrunch Disrupt SF 2017 - Day 1
Lightspeed Founder and Partner Ravi Mhatre (Steve Jennings/Getty Images)
Weird Money

Swashbuckling venture capital is slowly becoming boring old private equity

Lightspeed may lead a wave of VC firms making PE-like investments as the amount of money they manage continues to increase.

Jack Raines

The venture capital business model has, historically, looked something like this: investors would identify promising startups, they would invest some amount of money in these startups, and a few of the startups would (hopefully) either get acquired or go public at a much higher valuation, generating outsized returns that more than paid back the entire value of the fund. Venture funds typically charge their limited partners (LPs)  “2 and 20,” or a 2% management fee as well as 20% of the fund’s profits.

One constraint of this business model has been total market size: startups are relatively small companies (at least compared to their publicly traded peers) in which investors typically deploy relatively small amounts of capital (excluding, of course, outliers that can raise $6.5 billion or whatever), and only a minority of these startups will generate outsized positive returns. The result: effectively deploying capital becomes more difficult as a fund’s size grows. $100 million is easy to deploy across several early stage deals. $5 billion? That’s much tougher. With regards to compensation, venture funds face a tradeoff: more assets under management pays higher management fees, but it can create a drag on performance that reduces profit potential.

Another issue facing venture capital lately has been fewer exit opportunities. Companies are increasingly choosing to stay private longer, IPO activity since 2022 has been sluggish at best, and regulators have shown increased scrutiny toward mergers and acquisitions. The result: global VC exits by both volume and total market value hit five-year lows in 2023, impacting venture returns.

But what if there were a solution that could solve venture capital’s size constraints and liquidity problems? It turns out, there is, and it’s called “private equity.”

Unlike venture funds, which write small checks to small companies, PE funds typically take much larger controlling stakes in mature companies, where they look to improve operating leverage before either selling them (often to other private equity firms) or taking them public. If a venture fund were to, say, make private equity-like investments, it could presumably deploy a lot more capital, allowing the fund to charge a lot more in management fees, and the company would have a new pool for potential buyers of its portfolio companies as well: other PE funds.

Lightspeed Venture Partners, a Menlo Park-based venture firm with $25 billion in AUM, appears to be doing just that. The venture firm is looking to raise $7 billion across three new funds, and ~40% of that funding is going to investments that look a lot like private equity. From The Information:

Close to 40% of the new money will go to an opportunity fund that will make follow-on investments in its portfolio companies and buy shares in late-stage startups such as Stripe and Rippling from existing investors. In some cases, Lightspeed will seek controlling stakes in aging enterprise software startups and try to prepare the companies for a sale or public listing.

Assuming a 2 and 20 structure, a $7 billion fundraise represents $140 million in annual management fees — not a bad payday. Additionally, its investment strategy aligns well with current market conditions. Lightspeed’s line of thinking probably goes something like this:

“There are several late-stage private companies with investors that want to offload stakes on the secondary market. Why not raise a fund to buy some of those stakes, potentially at a discount, if those funds need to return capital to their LPs? And while we’re at it, we might as well go full-buyout mode and acquire controlling stakes in some mature companies, too.”

While 60% of Lightspeed Venture Partners’ new capital will go toward funding investments in growth-stage and early-stage startups, this ~40% is “venture” capital in name only, not that that’s a bad thing. At the end of the day, investment groups are in the business of making money, and if private equity practices present a more lucrative investment opportunity than traditional venture, I believe we’ll see other large venture funds building out private equity-like vehicles, too.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Retail traders are dumping Bloom Energy after near 300% rally, says JPMorgan

Retail traders are swarming for the exits in fuel cell company Bloom Energy, causing what was once a near 300% rally year-to-date to sour.

JPMorgan strategists led by Arun Jain flagged that Bloom’s net imbalance – the balance of buying versus selling among retail traders – was exceptionally negative as of 11 a.m. ET, even worse than during its double-digit drop on Wednesday.

JPM retail BE

The fuel cell company, which counts Oracle among its customers, eclipsed a market cap in excess of $20 billion earlier this week despite generating less than $2 billion in sales over the past year.

Wall Street began to sound some alarm bells about the extent of Bloom’s run this week, with Jefferies downgrading the stock to underperform from hold on Wednesday while Bank of America analysts wrote, “We are still not buying into BE's AI hype.”

Italian Hemp Growers Struggle With Anti-drug Laws

Investors are growing bullish on weed stocks. But why?

We spoke to ATB Capital Markets analyst Frederico Gomes about why institutional investors are growing bullish on cannabis.

markets

Duolingo rises as executives talk up China opportunity

Duolingo posted a solid gain Thursday, the latest in a series of relatively light-on-news moves in the stock this month as it has regained some attention among options-trading retail investors.

There was a story in China’s official China Daily where executives laid out their plans for the language-learning app’s push into the People’s Republic, which has been a focus of Wall Street analysts on recent post-earnings conference calls.

China, where the company began doing business in 2018, is Duolingo’s fastest-growing market for its language-learning app. It’s also the largest source of test takers for its Duolingo English Test proficiency exam business, a recent focus for management spotlighted in its recent Duocon product announcements.

It’s hard to say if the China Daily story is the reason for today’s upswing in the stock, but given the necessities of working within a country controlled by the Chinese Communist Party, a relatively favorable story appearing in its international propaganda organ suggests a relatively healthy working relationship is developing there.

China, where the company began doing business in 2018, is Duolingo’s fastest-growing market for its language-learning app. It’s also the largest source of test takers for its Duolingo English Test proficiency exam business, a recent focus for management spotlighted in its recent Duocon product announcements.

It’s hard to say if the China Daily story is the reason for today’s upswing in the stock, but given the necessities of working within a country controlled by the Chinese Communist Party, a relatively favorable story appearing in its international propaganda organ suggests a relatively healthy working relationship is developing there.

markets

Oklo dives after insider sale

Oklo dove Thursday after an SEC filing showed company director Michael Klein sold some $6.7 million in stock in transactions that, importantly, were not part of a pre-set insider sales plan.

Wall Street analysts forecast that the nuclear power startup will make losses for years to come. But the company’s ties to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who served as Oklo’s chairman until April, have helped make the stock a favorite of retail traders and a popular momentum play.

Even after today’s stumble, it’s up more than 400% this year and nearly 1,300% over the past 12 months.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.