Markets
TechCrunch Disrupt SF 2017 - Day 1
Lightspeed Founder and Partner Ravi Mhatre (Steve Jennings/Getty Images)
Weird Money

Swashbuckling venture capital is slowly becoming boring old private equity

Lightspeed may lead a wave of VC firms making PE-like investments as the amount of money they manage continues to increase.

Jack Raines

The venture capital business model has, historically, looked something like this: investors would identify promising startups, they would invest some amount of money in these startups, and a few of the startups would (hopefully) either get acquired or go public at a much higher valuation, generating outsized returns that more than paid back the entire value of the fund. Venture funds typically charge their limited partners (LPs)  “2 and 20,” or a 2% management fee as well as 20% of the fund’s profits.

One constraint of this business model has been total market size: startups are relatively small companies (at least compared to their publicly traded peers) in which investors typically deploy relatively small amounts of capital (excluding, of course, outliers that can raise $6.5 billion or whatever), and only a minority of these startups will generate outsized positive returns. The result: effectively deploying capital becomes more difficult as a fund’s size grows. $100 million is easy to deploy across several early stage deals. $5 billion? That’s much tougher. With regards to compensation, venture funds face a tradeoff: more assets under management pays higher management fees, but it can create a drag on performance that reduces profit potential.

Another issue facing venture capital lately has been fewer exit opportunities. Companies are increasingly choosing to stay private longer, IPO activity since 2022 has been sluggish at best, and regulators have shown increased scrutiny toward mergers and acquisitions. The result: global VC exits by both volume and total market value hit five-year lows in 2023, impacting venture returns.

But what if there were a solution that could solve venture capital’s size constraints and liquidity problems? It turns out, there is, and it’s called “private equity.”

Unlike venture funds, which write small checks to small companies, PE funds typically take much larger controlling stakes in mature companies, where they look to improve operating leverage before either selling them (often to other private equity firms) or taking them public. If a venture fund were to, say, make private equity-like investments, it could presumably deploy a lot more capital, allowing the fund to charge a lot more in management fees, and the company would have a new pool for potential buyers of its portfolio companies as well: other PE funds.

Lightspeed Venture Partners, a Menlo Park-based venture firm with $25 billion in AUM, appears to be doing just that. The venture firm is looking to raise $7 billion across three new funds, and ~40% of that funding is going to investments that look a lot like private equity. From The Information:

Close to 40% of the new money will go to an opportunity fund that will make follow-on investments in its portfolio companies and buy shares in late-stage startups such as Stripe and Rippling from existing investors. In some cases, Lightspeed will seek controlling stakes in aging enterprise software startups and try to prepare the companies for a sale or public listing.

Assuming a 2 and 20 structure, a $7 billion fundraise represents $140 million in annual management fees — not a bad payday. Additionally, its investment strategy aligns well with current market conditions. Lightspeed’s line of thinking probably goes something like this:

“There are several late-stage private companies with investors that want to offload stakes on the secondary market. Why not raise a fund to buy some of those stakes, potentially at a discount, if those funds need to return capital to their LPs? And while we’re at it, we might as well go full-buyout mode and acquire controlling stakes in some mature companies, too.”

While 60% of Lightspeed Venture Partners’ new capital will go toward funding investments in growth-stage and early-stage startups, this ~40% is “venture” capital in name only, not that that’s a bad thing. At the end of the day, investment groups are in the business of making money, and if private equity practices present a more lucrative investment opportunity than traditional venture, I believe we’ll see other large venture funds building out private equity-like vehicles, too.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Momentum returns to optics stocks as the release valve for AI optimism

Potentially imminent end to the war? Buy optics stocks.

Maybe not? Buy optics stocks anyways.

Effectively all the juice left in the AI trade is coming from optics (and memory) stocks. And the latter group is taking a bit of a breather today while the former continues to surge.

Shares of Ciena Corp., Lumentum, Coherent are building on recent big gains and among the biggest gainers in the S&P 500 near midday, while Applied Optoelectronics is also surging on Thursday.

These companies all provide solutions that help information move around in data centers, and thus are key beneficiaries of the aggressive capex plans of hyperscalers. Nvidia has invested $2 billion apiece in Coherent and Lumentum in deals that also include purchase commitments.

markets

Space stocks rip during a topsy-turvy day for the equity market

Satellite-services-from-space stocks surged Thursday after reports that Amazon is in talks to buy Globalstar, which provides voice and connectivity services from its satellite network. It also can’t hurt that the general mood around space is ebullient, following the successful launch of Artemis II on Thursday.

Planet Labs and ViaSat also soared on the news.

The gains for EchoStar — seen as a backdoor play at pre-IPO SpaceX exposure — and Rocket Lab were more muted, perhaps because a deep-pocketed competitor like Jeff Bezos getting serious about space services could complicate the plans of the two largest commercial space launch companies.

Rocket Lab and SpaceX see launch services as key to their aspirations of being major providers of voice and data services from low-Earth orbit satellites.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s SpaceX is the dominant provider of such services, and the early rumors on the company’s planned IPO — expected to be the largest ever — suggest the market is very excited about the prospects for the industry.

Elsewhere in the space stock world, Intuitive Machines — a maker of space infrastructure that provides services to NASA for lunar missions — also rose.

The gains for EchoStar — seen as a backdoor play at pre-IPO SpaceX exposure — and Rocket Lab were more muted, perhaps because a deep-pocketed competitor like Jeff Bezos getting serious about space services could complicate the plans of the two largest commercial space launch companies.

Rocket Lab and SpaceX see launch services as key to their aspirations of being major providers of voice and data services from low-Earth orbit satellites.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s SpaceX is the dominant provider of such services, and the early rumors on the company’s planned IPO — expected to be the largest ever — suggest the market is very excited about the prospects for the industry.

Elsewhere in the space stock world, Intuitive Machines — a maker of space infrastructure that provides services to NASA for lunar missions — also rose.

markets

Tesla delivered 358,023 vehicles in Q1, short of expectations

Ahead of its first-quarter earnings later this month, Tesla on Thursday announced that it delivered 358,023 vehicles in the quarter.

Analysts polled by FactSet had expected 380,500 vehicle deliveries in the first quarter this year, while Tesla last month released its own company-compiled Wall Street consensus estimate — something it began in the fourth quarter of 2025 — of 365,645 vehicles.

Shares extended losses in premarket trading on Thursday, falling more than 4%.

The figure is still up from the same quarter last year, when Tesla delivered fewer than 337,000 vehicles amid intensifying competition in China and flailing public perception over CEO Elon Musk’s involvement with the Trump administration.

As of 3 p.m. ET on Wednesday, event contract odds held a slightly less optimistic view than the broader analyst community, but a sunnier view than the figure Tesla put forward. 52% of traders predicted Tesla’s Q1 deliveries would come in at more than 360,000, 40% thought the figure would be higher than 370,000, and 15% estimated it would be higher than 380,000.

(Event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC — probabilities referenced or sourced from KalshiEx LLC or ForecastEx LLC.)

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC. Futures and event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC.