Markets
UK Prime Minister Meets With President Trump In Washington
Look! Over there! At Nvidia! Don’t look at me. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
BLAME GAME

Nvidia or Trump’s tariffs? Who’s to blame for the S&P 500’s tumble into the red for 2025?

Let’s look at the market scoreboard.

Luke Kawa

After the close on Wednesday, Nvidia released a set of quarterly results that, while impressive on the surface, failed to wow traders.

Ahead of the market open on Thursday, President Donald Trump recommitted to 25% tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico, as well as a 10% levy on Chinese imports effective March 4.

Which bears more blame for the S&P 500’s 1.6% drop, which erased its gains for the year?

Well, let’s turn to the market scoreboard.

A basket of stocks selected by Goldman Sachs as being particularly vulnerable to potential Trump tariffs fell 2% on the day. That’s bad! The Nasdaq 100, however, was worse, with a 2.8% decline.

If we go back to the start of last September (an arbitrary line for beginning to price in potential impacts of a Trump presidency), this day ranks in the 77th percentile for how this cohort performed compared to the Magnificent 7. That is to say, in only about 23% of sessions did tariff-exposed stocks outperform the tech giants by more than they did on Thursday. For tariff-vulnerable stocks versus the Nasdaq 100, this was a 75th percentile day over the same time frame.

Tariff-sensitive stocks suffered a larger decline last Friday than they did on Thursday, whereas this was far and away the Nasdaq 100’s worst session since the DeepSeek-induced plunge.

Zooming out, since September, Goldman’s basket of tariff-exposed stocks is up modestly, while a basket of stocks judged to be well insulated from trade barriers is down nearly 5%.

(The same performance gap holds true if we’re just looking since Election Day, too!)

There is not strong evidence to suggest that tariffs have been a big driver of price action in general, and on Thursday in particular.

If the stock market is in the process of “waking up” to the threat of tariffs, Thursday was more akin to groggily hitting the snooze button. Again.

Don’t overthink it: when a ̶$̶3̶ $2.93 trillion chip designer tumbles after reporting earnings and the rest of the sector goes with it, Occam’s Razor applies.

An appropriate diagnosis of what’s happening in the here and now — particularly during a market drawdown — is important because it offers a lens into what can or might happen next, and what kind of catalysts investors should look out for that might change the character of the tape.

If the phrase “growth scare” is coming up more and more often but the pain points in the market are the meltdowns in former high-flying stocks that aren’t considered to be highly economically sensitive and credit spreads are still relatively well behaved, then it isn’t a growth scare yet! But it could certainly become one. Or not!

Of note: financials, an indisputably cyclical sector whose outlook is inextricably tied to the health of the US economy, was the best-performing S&P 500 sector ETF on Thursday, putting in a 0.6% gain.

If you’re in the midst of a growth scare or tariff-induced sell-off, the top things to monitor are the evolution of the economic data and any chatter related to trade barriers. If you’re looking for what reverses a momentum breakdown, the answer is much more likely to be found in technicals and flows — key levels where certain important names might find a floor. To that end, Nvidia has broken down below its 200-day moving average, and Tesla is trading nearly bang on that level.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

ServiceNow rises after Bank of America analysts reinstate as a Buy with a $130 price target

ServiceNow is up 4% in early trading on Tuesday, after Bank of America analysts reinstated coverage of the stock with a buy rating and a $130 price objective.

Now seeing the company as an “AI beneficiary given its entrenched workflow position,” Bank of America analysts, led by Tal Liani, wrote that “AI increases the need for governance, positioning ServiceNow at the center of workflow orchestration and control.” Replacing NOW with new AI tools, which has been the primary concern for many investors who have dumped the stock this year (the company's earnings being the latest example), will be “costly and complex,” considering the company’s “deeply embedded mission-critical position” within existing enterprise workflows, according to BofA's analysts.

The threat of AI agents, which can autonomously do tasks once set up, might actually lead to more demand for ServiceNow's products, with Liani writing that agentic AI deployments "would elevate the need for orchestration, permissions, approvals, policy enforcement and auditability, aligning directly with ServiceNow's core capabilities and making it the orchestration layer in an AI-driven cycle".

The team also highlighted how ServiceNow’s recent initiatives would benefit from AI, rather than being threatened:

“[W]e see the company capturing incremental value as AI adoption scales: AI Control Tower defines the strategic role; Action Fabric provides the connective layer into workflows; hybrid pricing creates the monetization model; and the Armis/Veza acquisitions strengthen the security and identity context.”

That’s a much-needed vote of confidence for NOW, which has seen its shares drop more than 40% in 2026 until the past week’s uptick. Other software peers like Workday, Atlassian, HubSpot, and Intuit are also in the green before the bell on Tuesday.

markets

Memory stocks tumble after Seagate warns on difficulty of meeting demand, bond yields edge higher

Memory stocks are cratering on Monday after media reports indicating that Seagate Technology Holdings CEO Dave Mosley warned that it would “just take too long” to boost capacity to meet AI-fueled demand.

Micron, Sandisk, and Western Digital are down in addition to Seagate.

Another place to look to help explain the group’s sudden travails (lumping together flash, storage, and high-bandwidth): memory stocks have displayed an elevated level of momentum, and momentum stocks have generally come under acute pressure during sudden bond market sell-offs.

Mosley’s answer, delivered at a JPMorgan conference, is worth reading in full, as the summarized media reports miss some of the nuance (emphasis added):

What our customers are driving us for right now is more exabytes. And we believe that the way to get the most exabytes is to take our talented teams and really go through these technology transitions. We're targeting mid-20s percent growth, which is enormous CAGR. And the only way we're going to get there is to be able to go through those technology transitions, if you will, to take a 3 terabyte per platter product to a 4 terabyte per platter to a 5 terabyte per platter year over year over year. And so that's really the way we're driving it. If we took the teams off and started building new factories or bringing up new machines, it would just take too long. You would end up more capacity, if you will, but then you'd slow the rate of growth on that technology. So back to your question directly, the wildcard really is in unit capacity for disk drives, which we again could be fairly flexible with once we package those heads and media. That gets down to more customer diversification and edge and edge AI and all those use cases, which I think could come someday. So we would take the heads and media that we have planned and divert them somewhere else should those applications take hold.

To grossly oversimplify Mosley’s answer, he’s saying that in a resource-constrained environment, technology improvements are the better way to meet demand than building out more capacity.

Reasonable folks can quibble about how negative these remarks really are for the industry.

On one hand, not getting over their skis on capex is something that, all else equal, would protect profitability over time and avoid the boom-bust cycles that have plagued the industry.

On the other hand, that gives more time for competitors (especially those from China) to try to step in and meet the market’s appetite for memory. To that end, Changxin Memory Technologies is posting massive growth as it readies for an IPO.

markets

Lumentum, Coherent fall after hedge fund manager Aschenbrenner dumps his holdings

Shares of Lumentum and Coherent plunged Monday after Leopold Aschenbrenner, ex-OpenAI researcher turned investor, disclosed his Situational Awareness fund exited its holdings in those companies during the first quarter.

By the afternoon, Lumentum was down 11% and Coherent was down over 6%. The losses are relatively small compared to the over 120% and 80% gains the AI infrastructure companies had put up, respectively, since January.

The two companies are developers of phonetics and optical equipment, which help data centers and AI hyperscalers transmit data.

Aschenbrenner’s firm, Situational Awareness, is making major market ripples today, also sending shares of T1 Energy soaring on news he bought the stock.

He also made a bearish bet against Nvidia, which recently invested $4 billion ($2 billion each) into Lumentum and Coherent.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.