Markets
markets
Luke Kawa

The market’s decided that tariffs ≠ recession anymore

There are many ways to say “markets are pricing out recession risk and pricing in a continuation of the AI boom.”

Today, Nvidia is enjoying a healthy gain while the S&P 500 has a relatively run-of-the-mill decline following some fresh tariff tape bombs that sent futures lower on Thursday evening into Friday morning. That’s one way to say it.

Another way would be to look at the market’s pricing of inflation risk over the coming 24 months, and how that’s evolved since tariffs started to become a front-burner issue.

In the run-up to and immediate aftermath of Liberation Day, traders were pricing in tariffs as a front-loaded shock to prices that would push up near-term inflation while also pushing down inflation 12 to 24 months down the road.

The way to rationalize this, which was very much corroborated by the price action in equities at the time, was that tariffs were increasing recession risk: consumers were going to face a big purchasing power shock, be able to buy less, and that would prompt layoffs. Then inflation would decelerate, since corporate pricing power would go down with fewer people having jobs and able to buy things.

Something different has been happening lately. As one-year CPI inflation swaps have been moving higher lately, so too have the one-year, one-year forwards:

(That 2.5% one-year, one-year forward rate is roughly consistent with 2% PCE inflation — that is, consistent with the Federal Reserve’s target.)

Putting that together with stocks near all-time highs, the market’s judgement at this time appears to be that tariffs will propel inflation higher and there won’t be much economic pain as a result.

This shift in market pricing is also occurring amid an evolution in how Federal Reserve officials are thinking about the inflationary impact of tariffs. At his March press conference following a rate decision, Fed Chair Jerome Powell said it was “kind of the base case” that tariffs would spark one-off inflationary pressures (or transitory ones, if you prefer. No one will prefer.)

The release of minutes from the Federal Reserve’s June meeting this week showed that “a few participants” thought tariffs would lead to just a one-time increase in prices and not be a big deal for inflation expectations, but “most participants noted the risk that tariffs could have more persistent effects on inflation.”

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

SpaceX gets a wave of bullish ratings from Wall Street analysts

SpaceX received more than a dozen positive analyst calls on Tuesday — including from major Wall Street banks — as they initiate coverage on Elon Musk’s space and AI company.

SpaceX went public on June 12 at a $2.2 trillion valuation, the largest debut in history. While the company hasn’t yet posted a profit, it seems to have convinced Wall Street that it will get there and grow its valuation on the way.

Of the at least 17 analysts that gave a rating on Tuesday, all but one gave it a “buy” or “outperform” rating. MoffettNathanson was "neutral."

The ratings come as SpaceX joined the Nasdaq 100 index, a benchmark tech-heavy basket of companies that underpins millions of portfolios. The inclusion adds built-in demand for the stock from index funds and ETFs.

Still, SpaceX fell more than 5% on Tuesday amid a broader sell-off, and is currently effectively flat from its opening price of $150 a share.

markets

Nike sinks to lowest level since 2014 after warning of “challenged” sales environment in Q4 report

Did Nike do it?

Investors had a mixed reaction after the global sports apparel company reported its fourth quarter earnings on Tuesday after the bell. Shares initially rose 5% as Nike beat out Wall Street expectations amid a hefty tariff refund bonus. However, the stock then sank to its lowest level since August 2014 in postmarket trading.

Here are the Q4 numbers:

  • Revenue of $11.0 billion (estimate: $10.8 billion).

  • Adjusted earnings per share of $0.20 (estimate: $0.12).

Ahead of this report, Nike warned that results would be flattered by a one-time tariff refund (now estimated at roughly $0.52 per share for the bottom line). That gave the company an extra cushion in snapping its streak of seven quarters of year-over-year profit declines.

Over the past year, the company had been punished by tariffs on imported goods, stagnant consumer spending, and increasing competition from other footwear brands like New Balance, Adidas, and Hoka.

Outgoing CFO Matthew Friend deemed it an “increasingly challenging operating environment, where sell-through remains challenged.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.