Markets
markets
Luke Kawa

The S&P 500 hasn’t been this oversold and overvalued at the same time in over a quarter century

The drop in the S&P 500 since February 19 has been steep and sudden.

Markets that fall hard, fast tend to end up in a so-called “oversold” position — that is, everyone’s dumped so much, so quickly, seemingly leaving nowhere to go but up (at least for a little relief rally).

However, oversold markets are also often cheap. And the S&P 500’s 12-month forward price-to-earnings ratio, which at 18.3x is in the 74th percentile relative to history since January 1990, is down from its 2025 peak of 22.4x but does not scream cheap.

Just how rare is this mixture of seemingly overvalued and oversold?

To measure oversold, let’s go with how far the S&P 500 is trading below its 50-day moving average. By that gauge, the S&P 500 is completely washed out, ending last week 13.2% below that technical measure of short-term trend. Going back to January 1990, less than 0.7% of the time has the S&P 500 traded lower relative to its 50-day moving average than it is now.

Over this time frame, there’s only been one day where the S&P 500 was more richly valued, based on its forward price-to-earnings ratio, and further below its 50-day moving average than it is now: August 31, 1998. That’s the week Russia defaulted on debt and devalued its currency, events that accelerated the demise of Long-Term Capital Management.

One sentence from Bloomberg’s daily wrap that day reads, “Dell fell 18 3/4 to 100, Microsoft lost 9 5/16 to 95 15/16, and Intel dropped 5 13/16 to 71 3/16.”

So, the benchmark US stock index hasn’t been this oversold and this expensive simultaneously since we were quoting stock prices in fractions.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

SpaceX gets a wave of bullish ratings from Wall Street analysts

SpaceX received more than a dozen positive analyst calls on Tuesday — including from major Wall Street banks — as they initiate coverage on Elon Musk’s space and AI company.

SpaceX went public on June 12 at a $2.2 trillion valuation, the largest debut in history. While the company hasn’t yet posted a profit, it seems to have convinced Wall Street that it will get there and grow its valuation on the way.

Of the at least 17 analysts that gave a rating on Tuesday, all but one gave it a “buy” or “outperform” rating. MoffettNathanson was "neutral."

The ratings come as SpaceX joined the Nasdaq 100 index, a benchmark tech-heavy basket of companies that underpins millions of portfolios. The inclusion adds built-in demand for the stock from index funds and ETFs.

Still, SpaceX fell more than 5% on Tuesday amid a broader sell-off, and is currently effectively flat from its opening price of $150 a share.

markets

Nike sinks to lowest level since 2014 after warning of “challenged” sales environment in Q4 report

Did Nike do it?

Investors had a mixed reaction after the global sports apparel company reported its fourth quarter earnings on Tuesday after the bell. Shares initially rose 5% as Nike beat out Wall Street expectations amid a hefty tariff refund bonus. However, the stock then sank to its lowest level since August 2014 in postmarket trading.

Here are the Q4 numbers:

  • Revenue of $11.0 billion (estimate: $10.8 billion).

  • Adjusted earnings per share of $0.20 (estimate: $0.12).

Ahead of this report, Nike warned that results would be flattered by a one-time tariff refund (now estimated at roughly $0.52 per share for the bottom line). That gave the company an extra cushion in snapping its streak of seven quarters of year-over-year profit declines.

Over the past year, the company had been punished by tariffs on imported goods, stagnant consumer spending, and increasing competition from other footwear brands like New Balance, Adidas, and Hoka.

Outgoing CFO Matthew Friend deemed it an “increasingly challenging operating environment, where sell-through remains challenged.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.