Markets
markets
Luke Kawa

Futures fall after President Trump announces new global tariff rate boosted to 15%

10% global tariffs will be 15% global tariffs.

In a Truth Social post on Saturday, President Donald Trump said he was boosting the new levies slated to go into effect after the Supreme Court ruled against his reciprocal tariff regime. Stocks jolted lower on Sunday evening as traders digested the news, and remained in the red on Monday morning, with futures on the S&P 500 Index off 0.53% while contracts tied to the tech-heavier NDX are off 0.7%.

Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 sets a ceiling of 15% on the tariff rate that can be imposed “to deal with large and serious United States balance-of-payments-deficits,” which was cited as part of the rationale for this measure.

This tax on imports can stay in place for 150 days; afterward, congressional approval would be required. It will not apply to a variety of different products, including energy, critical minerals, certain electronics, passenger vehicles, and goods that fall under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement.

In press interviews on the weekend, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described this global tariff as a “five-month bridge” during which time the administration will go through the process of enacting tariffs using alternative authorities.

JPMorgan estimates that the effective US tariff rate will fall modestly as a result of the end of tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the utilization of Section 122.

“The macro impact of these developments shouldn’t be huge,” JPMorgan Chief US Economist Michael Feroli wrote. “This isn’t to say there won’t be headaches for importers juggling different tariff schedules, but the difference in the aggregate fiscal burden of the tariffs on domestic purchasers is not enough to have a big effect on our outlook.”

That being said, the US effective tariff rate has risen meaningfully during each of Trump’s terms in office: Trump Always Raises Tariffs (TART).

“President Trump really believes that tariffs work and that trade deficits are bad,” wrote Libby Cantrill, head of public policy at PIMCO. “Given the tools he has, we should expect tariff and trade policy uncertainty to last as long as Trump is in the White House.”

However, the smaller set of tools the president is being forced to work with has “substantially greater process constraints in place, meaning that the planning uncertainty for firms is reduced even if the administration is committed to reinstating some of the tariffs,” wrote Peter Williams, economist at 22V Research. “The whimsical nature of the process over the past year is gone and with it much of the day-to-day uncertainty.”

Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 sets a ceiling of 15% on the tariff rate that can be imposed “to deal with large and serious United States balance-of-payments-deficits,” which was cited as part of the rationale for this measure.

This tax on imports can stay in place for 150 days; afterward, congressional approval would be required. It will not apply to a variety of different products, including energy, critical minerals, certain electronics, passenger vehicles, and goods that fall under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement.

In press interviews on the weekend, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described this global tariff as a “five-month bridge” during which time the administration will go through the process of enacting tariffs using alternative authorities.

JPMorgan estimates that the effective US tariff rate will fall modestly as a result of the end of tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the utilization of Section 122.

“The macro impact of these developments shouldn’t be huge,” JPMorgan Chief US Economist Michael Feroli wrote. “This isn’t to say there won’t be headaches for importers juggling different tariff schedules, but the difference in the aggregate fiscal burden of the tariffs on domestic purchasers is not enough to have a big effect on our outlook.”

That being said, the US effective tariff rate has risen meaningfully during each of Trump’s terms in office: Trump Always Raises Tariffs (TART).

“President Trump really believes that tariffs work and that trade deficits are bad,” wrote Libby Cantrill, head of public policy at PIMCO. “Given the tools he has, we should expect tariff and trade policy uncertainty to last as long as Trump is in the White House.”

However, the smaller set of tools the president is being forced to work with has “substantially greater process constraints in place, meaning that the planning uncertainty for firms is reduced even if the administration is committed to reinstating some of the tariffs,” wrote Peter Williams, economist at 22V Research. “The whimsical nature of the process over the past year is gone and with it much of the day-to-day uncertainty.”

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Intel shares are officially a thing

April most definitely has not been the cruelest month for US chip giant Intel or its shareholders.

The stock is on a remarkable run that’s made it the best performer in the S&P 500 for the month, posting a gain of nearly 43% shortly after 11 a.m. ET Friday. That’s outdone AI darlings like Sandisk, Lumentum, Ciena Corp., Coherent, and Seagate Technology Holdings.

In fact, the monthly view actually underplays the extent of the stock’s performance. Over the eight sessions that ended yesterday — which includes March 31 — the stock was up just shy of 50%. That’s by far its best eight-day streak over the last 30 years.

Investors have eaten up Intel’s announcements this week of partnerships, first with Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s Terafab project, and separately, with Alphabet on developing custom chips for Google Cloud’s AI infrastructure needs.

More broadly, the seemingly relentless demand for computing capacity and chips related to AI seems to present, at least, the prospect of Intel actually solving the long-standing problems at its contract chipmaking business — known as a foundry — that have weighed on the business for years.

Oh, being partially nationalized by the US government amid an increasing global focus on ensuring secure supply chains for crucial technologies like semiconductors probably doesn’t hurt either.

(In case you're keeping track, the US bought a nearly 10% stake in Intel for about $8.9 billion in late August of last year. Today, that stake is worth about $27 billion.)

markets

Palantir’s slide continues, but President Trump tries to help

Investors were selling Palantir shares again on Friday, with the stock falling as much as 6% before stabilizing, thanks to an assist from the White House.

At its worst moments, the sell-off put the retail favorite on track for its worst weekly loss (more than 16%) since February 2021.

But Palantir has powerful friends: President Trump posted on Truth Social celebrating the company’s “great war fighting capabilities,” sending the stock higher, though it remained in the red.

Truth post on PLTR
(Truth Social)

The overall negative sentiment seems to stem from Anthropic’s powerful new AI models, at least judging from the latest epistle from Palantir bull Dan Ives at Wedbush Securities:

“Anthropic released a new product around multi-agent orchestration, which continues to add more headwinds to the software sector. While Anthropic is hitting a new scale with the company now at $30 billion [annual run rate], up from $9 billion at the start of the year, we believe this is not at the expense of PLTR’s business as the company continues to accelerate both its US commercial and government businesses.”

Of course, the specter of AI undermining of other software companies has been a well-established theme for months. And it’s clearly at play in the market on Friday, with Palo Alto Networks, ServiceNow, CrowdStrike, Zscaler, Figma, and Atlassian continuing to get clocked on negative AI implications.

But the recent inclusion of Palantir among the pack of potentially replaceable software providers is newer, with the view popularized by well-followed market commentator Michael Burry’s pronouncement — since deleted — that Anthropic is “eating Palantir’s lunch,” which seemed to contribute to the downdraft for Palantir today.

The stock dove through its 50-day moving average in recent days, underscoring the sputtering momentum for what has been one of the market’s biggest winners over the last couple years. Long-term holders are still up massively, with the stock up about 1,400% over the last three years.

124% 🚗

China exported more than twice as many electric vehicles (and plug-in hybrids) in the first quarter of 2026 as it did in the same period last year, according to the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA).

New energy vehicle exports surged 124% year over year, as major players like BYD and Chery ramped up overseas efforts to combat lower domestic sales. Tesla’s China business also boosted exports, shipping 164% more EVs than the same period the year before.

Nio is ramping up export efforts as well, with a goal to deliver “several thousand” EVs overseas this year and have a presence in 40 countries. Still, the automaker exported 271 vehicles in Q1 — less than half of a percent of the company’s total deliveries.

According to the CPCA, April will see the country’s automotive industry continue its “slow recovery.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC. Futures and event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC.