Markets

Manvs.market

A big downturn in cannabis stocks has led to a weed beef

Weed seed passover from D.C. to Maryland
Ben Kovler, CEO of Green Thumb Industries, cuts a ribbon to open the Rise dispensary in Silver Spring, Maryland (Robb Hill/Getty Images)

Why a US cannabis CEO is at war with an ETF manager

In an unusual exchange, Green Thumb CEO Ben Kovler accused an ETF manager of influencing the price of his stock.

When the AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF first launched in 2020, Green Thumb Industries CEO Ben Kovler thanked the firm for including his company in the basket, calling it “a win to me.”

Now, more than four years later, the mood in the cannabis industry is less cheery. The ETF, which uses the ticker symbol MSOS, is down 84% since its debut as the potential for federal weed reform stagnates and a debt crisis for companies in the industry looms. 

Kovler doesn’t seem to think being part of MSOS is a win anymore. Last week, he publicly accused AdvisorShares of contributing to Green Thumb’s low stock price and called for MSOS to coordinate with the company to help mitigate the negative impact that outflows from the fund can have on his shares.

“With all due respect, what is your fiduciary duty here?” Kovler asked AdvisorShares CEO Noah Hamman on X on March 13. “Is it a duty of care or loyalty to the long term holders of your product or is it simply to check the boxes & clip your fees?”

Kovler and Green Thumb did not respond to several requests for comment. Hamman told Sherwood News that “the ETF doesn’t move or make those prices; the valuation of the ETF is simply a sum of its parts.”

Unlike Canadian cannabis companies like Tilray, Canopy Growth, or SNDL Inc., any company that grows or sells weed in the US cannot list on major exchanges. Instead, they trade on over-the-counter markets, which have less liquidity and are more vulnerable to fraud, ultimately reducing their potential investor base.

AdvisorShares debuted the ETF with the goal of giving investors a convenient way to gain exposure to the US cannabis market. MSOS is able to list on the New York Stock Exchange because it does not directly hold the stocks; it holds derivatives. At its peak in February 2021, the fund’s assets nearly eclipsed $1.3 billion. That figure is now down to about $370 million. 

Though similar funds have followed MSOS’s lead, it remains the largest fund of its kind and indirectly holds large stakes in major cannabis operators, including roughly 10% of Green Thumb.

MSOS was initially welcomed by the industry, which saw it as a way to get more investors exposed to their companies. At the time, hopes for federal reform were high and valuations were rising. But now morale and share prices are plummeting, making it little wonder why pockets of discontent have emerged among investors and executives. 

From Kovler’s perspective, MSOS might now be more of a driver in the market rather than just a participant — a case of the tail wagging the dog.

“What if your product was creating the underlying movement?” Kovler asked Hamman on X on March 14. Kovler clarified that he didn’t think the ETF was responsible for his stock falling, but said “the action in the sector since the election has been exaggerated by the etf.”

Green Thumb is currently in the process of a $50 million stock buyback program, and Kovler told Hamman on X that he would prefer the ETF call him when it has shares to offload. Hamman said its priority is getting the best price.

“To tell us we need to call him every time there’s a redemption in the fund is weird and unusual,” Hamman told Sherwood.  

Why buy MSOS?

On a February 26 earnings call, Green Thumb reported revenues and earnings that beat expectations, but Kovler told analysts, “You would not know it looking at the stock price, which is hovering at a 52-week low.”

One factor potentially fueling Kovler’s frustration is that Green Thumb is more profitable than its peers, but its stock price doesn’t trade at a significant premium. If this were a company in any other industry, trading on a major exchange and benefiting from high institutional ownership, you’d expect to see superior operating performance reflected by a higher valuation. But cannabis companies more often trade off sector-wide trends versus a specific company’s fundamentals.

Most professional investors in cannabis, several of whom were interviewed for this story but asked not to be named, say AdvisorShares isn’t doing anything nefarious but that MSOS is also no better an investment than directly owning the companies that make up the bulk of its basket. Its value is that it’s convenient and liquid, not that it performs particularly well. 

Investors also fear that MSOS could one day get a large number of outflows, forcing it to offload its exposure, which would drag down stock prices as its swap provider sells off, given the low liquidity in the market. It did see some outflows after Kovler’s allegations, but its shares outstanding remain high even as the price has fallen. Kovler has previously questioned how many of those shareholders are “real” vs. “AI.”

MSOS is very heavily weighted on the largest companies, not all of which have sparkling fundamentals, to say the least. Green Thumb makes up 33.4% of MSOS’s holdings. Just three companies — Green Thumb, Trulieve, and Curaleaf — compose more than 75% of the ETF’s basket. 

Since only a handful of companies in the space are on decent financial footing, any ETF purporting to provide broad exposure to the US cannabis market is going to have “dead weight” in it, a partner at a cannabis investment firm said. Another investor said AdvisorShares is forced to “buy shit and mix it into the chocolate.”

Alan Brochstein, an investor and blogger at New Cannabis Ventures, is more critical. He said AdvisorShares could manage the fund in a way that exposes them to better-quality companies. 

“If they were proving themselves to be good active investors then you wouldn’t want to just buy their top stocks and hold them, because you’d miss out on their active management,” he said. “They have no active management.”

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Exxon and Chevron surge as oil rises; gold keeps getting clobbered

Exxon and Chevron jumped again on Friday, the two largest positive contributors to the S&P 500 as of midday, even as the broader market remained mired in the red.

The two giant US energy companies are also on track to notch another in a series of new all-time highs as well Friday, and for obvious reasons.

Energy continues to be the bright spot for the S&P 500 since the start of the Iran war. (It is the only gainer of the 11 separate sectors that compose the blue-chip index, rising more than 7% in March.)

But energy’s gain has come with pain elsewhere. Since rising gas prices work mechanically as a tax on other forms of consumer spending, staples stocks have been hit hard, with the sector down more than 6% this month alone. Meanwhile, the inflationary pressure pushing the Fed away from further rate cuts continues to hit precious metals and miners. SPDR Gold Shares ETF and iShares Silver Trust futures both fell further on Friday; they’re down roughly 10% and 15% for the week, respectively, and producers like Newmont and Freeport-McMoRan also continue to drop.

markets

Investors have been drawn to software stocks since the Iran war started — Figma has been an exception

Since the Iran war started, risky assets have been in the crosshairs. Stocks have sold off as oil prices spiked, the odds of rate cuts later this year have been slashed, and even the usual safe havens like gold and silver have been unreliable ports in the growing storm.

One port of refuge, however, has been in software stocks. As noted by my colleague Matt Phillips recently, a number of high-profile software names — the same ones that some pundits doomed to obsolescence because of AI just a few short weeks ago — have held up well. Design company Figma, however, has not been one of those names.

Figmas stock has dropped 19% since the close of trading on February 27, while the iShares Expanded Tech Software ETF has gained 2%.

Though still notching very respectable top-line growth, with sales up 40% last year, Figma is far from the cash cow stage of its life — perhaps why its been hit harder than peers such as Adobe, Workday, or Salesforce. Indeed, on a GAAP basis, Wall Street still expects the company to lose $477 million this year, as heavy stock-based compensation weighs on its profitability.

Figmas pain was then compounded when Google announced a major update to Stitch on Wednesday — a product described as an AI-native software design canvas that allows anyone to create, iterate and collaborate on high-fidelity UI from natural language.

Debate is still raging on Reddit and other social media platforms as to whether Stitch, or other vibe-coding platforms and tools, will meaningfully eat into Figmas core business. One user said that it offers very little to experienced designers. It removes the tools Figma offers and delegates everything to AI. Figma at least has all the capabilities plus AI for people who want to use AI. Another — complaining about the newly prohibitive cost of credits in Figmas own AI-powered tool, Figma Make — was more bearish on Figmas usefulness, saying that the number of credits the designer would need to use would cost $16,000 under Figmas new pricing model.

For now, investors arent giving Figma the benefit of the doubt, with the stock down 12% in the last two days alone.

markets

Chip-smuggling charges against Super Micro cofounder boost rival server maker Dell

Dell is up in early Friday trading after rival Super Micro Computer plunged on news that one of its cofounders had been charged by US prosecutors with allegedly illegally smuggling AI chips to China.

Dell, Super Micro, and HP Enterprise are all what’s known as “system makers”: they sell ready-to-roll rack servers, storage systems, and the other hardware that’s needed to fill all those data centers that hyperscalers are so desperate to build.

Dell and Super Micro both sell systems built around Nvidia GPUs, so the US government’s allegations against key personnel tied to Super Micro could jeopardize the company’s access to Nvidia products and give Dell a leg up in that crucial AI-related server market.

Dell, Super Micro, and HP Enterprise are all what’s known as “system makers”: they sell ready-to-roll rack servers, storage systems, and the other hardware that’s needed to fill all those data centers that hyperscalers are so desperate to build.

Dell and Super Micro both sell systems built around Nvidia GPUs, so the US government’s allegations against key personnel tied to Super Micro could jeopardize the company’s access to Nvidia products and give Dell a leg up in that crucial AI-related server market.

markets

Planet Labs soars after earnings beat and positive analyst commentary

Planet Labs held on to huge post-earnings gains early Friday as analysts that cover the retail favorite issued largely upbeat reviews of its Q4 report released Thursday after the bell. Here’s some of their commentary on the satellite services company:

Wedbush (rating: “outperform, price target: $40): PL is seeing major tailwinds in the geopolitical space, continuing to drive mission-critical demand globally. Total RPO came in at ~ $852 million (up ~106% y/y) with backlog of ~$900+ million (up ~79% y/y) highlighted by 9- figure deal with the Swedish Armed Forces which was the third 9-figure Satellite Services contract over the past 12 months totaling $500+ million across Sweden, Japan, and Germany, with management noting on the call that both deal count and average size in the satellite services pipeline has grown appreciably.”

Citizens (rating: “market perform, price target: N/A): “In our view, Planets solid performance in the quarter and the significant revenue acceleration implied for FY27 reflect the companys success in shifting to a satellite services model and leaning (heavily) into the needs of Defense & Intelligence segment customers. We believe this is the correct area of focus (for management and investors) and view some of the flashier announcements around Project Suncatcher (space-based data centers), or more recently, AI enabling a renaissance within Planet’s Civil and Commercial businesses as somewhat of a distraction.”

Clear Street (rating: “buy, price target: $34): “While F2026 revenue grew 26%, non-defense verticals have lagged. Management signaled an inflection point, with use cases such as maritime awareness data poised towards gaining traction across finance, insurance, and supply chain, supported by a more tailored approach with LLM partnerships like Anthropic (private).”

There’s a reason the stock has built a strong retail following: it had already surged more than 500% over the past year, even before jumping another 20% after last night’s earnings.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC. Futures and event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC.