Power
Garbage Day

Trump’s social slump

By Ryan Broderick Adam Bumas
Former President Trump And VP Nominee Sen. JD Vance Hold Rally In St. Cloud, Minnesota
Stephen Maturen/Getty Images

Trump is struggling on social networks, and even Elon Musk isn’t helping

If you go by his performance on social platforms, Trump has been lagging since even before Kamala Harris became the Democratic nominee.

Ryan Broderick, Adam Bumas

The US presidential election has finally started in earnest and it's already made a huge impact on social platforms. Former President Donald Trump, who seemed like the front-runner until very recently, had 87 million followers on X and over 24 million on Instagram a month ago, while Vice President Kamala Harris had roughly 18 million X followers and 17 million on Instagram. But those numbers, just like the election itself, have shifted dramatically in the past few weeks. If the most recent social data is anything to go by, the Trump campaign is in serious trouble.

According to monthly Facebook data that Garbage Day has been collecting from NewsWhip, a link to Harris' ActBlue donation page was the most-interacted-with third-party link on the platform in July. This is a jaw-dropping stat for several reasons — the first being that Harris didn't announce her campaign until July 21. But it's an even bigger deal when you put it in context.

We've been tracking Facebook activity around pages, posts, and links for over a year now. Harris' ActBlue link is only one of two we've seen in that time crack a million interactions (the other being a Daily Mail story about actor Danny Trejo's sobriety last August). Harris' link was also more visited than Facebook's most popular publisher, Catholic Fundamentalism, the viral powerhouse that’s dominated the platform for the better part of a year.

Harris is also beating Trump when it comes to official pages. Hers grew by about 400,000 new followers after her announcement, while Trump’s increased by only 250,000 followers across all of July, with 130,000 of those coming after his attempted assassination on July 13.

Harris’ official Facebook page grew by about 400,000 followers in July, while Trump’s increased by only 250,000.

Harris is trouncing Trump on Instagram as well. Her main Instagram page was the fourth-most-followed account on the app for the month of July, gaining 2.3 million new followers after Harris announced her campaign. Meanwhile, Trump was the ninth-most-followed account, gaining only about 750,000 followers post-assassination attempt. For comparison, artist Sabrina Carpenter is doing better than Trump on Instagram. 

The only place Trump is outperforming Harris is in TikTok hashtags. But if you dig into the data, things aren't exactly positive for his campaign. 

TikTok, particularly at the highest levels of activity, is not an especially political place. For instance, in February, two of the top videos on the platform were of chocolate-covered strawberries. This is likely why the Harris campaign's embrace of Brat Summer has been so effective — it’s as meme-y and cultural as it is political. Her campaign-related videos can now bypass TikTok's filters around news content and have international appeal. So it was surprising to see that the biggest political hashtag on the app in July wasn't anything to do with Harris: it was #trump, but not because he's necessarily more popular on the platform.

The #trump hashtag was used in over half a million TikTok videos in July, just behind hashtags connected to the Olympics and the Fourth of July. Before you write off TikTok as a Republican stronghold, you need to take into account how and when the hashtag was used. According to TikTok’s analytics, all the attention arrived after July 13. Over the next two days, use of the hashtag increased by roughly seven times, trailing off over the next few days despite the Republican National Convention. Other conservative hashtags like #trump2024 and #maga followed similar trends, growing six or seven times in the 48 hours following the assassination attempt and then reverting closer to the mean after a few days. Essentially, after Trump was shot, there was a burst of TikTok activity that (mostly) faded away.

Since January, TikTok has offered public analytics for only a short list of hashtags and topics, tightening what advertisers and researchers can see, likely in response to government scrutiny. Because it prioritizes hashtags that’ve been popular for longer, that means we don’t have data for hashtags related to Harris. But we did find that hashtags like #biden, which was used in over 200,000 videos in July, and #democrats also peaked in interest following Trump’s assassination attempt. Unlike Trump-related hashtags, they had a second jump a week later after Biden dropped out and endorsed Harris. We saw similar patterns for other election-related hashtags, as well.

According to a June Pew Research report, most on TikTok don’t go there for news but likely end up seeing it. And they’re more likely to see opinions or jokes about news than the news itself — TikTok users are not especially interested in politics, but if something unusual happens, they tune in. In what must have been a crushing blow for the Trump campaign, Harris entering the race was simply more interesting than Trump's appointment of Ohio Sen. JD Vance to his presidential ticket. In fact, according to numbers we've seen, no one outside of X even noticed.

Vance was announced as Trump’s running mate on July 15. In the next two weeks, he gained over 1.1 million followers on X, up about 200% from where he was previously. He saw the second-highest percentage growth of any large X account over that time except for a Telegram blockchain game called “Dogs Community.”

Trump is also not doing so well on X — or at least not as well as he should be. Despite the former president’s commitment to Truth Social, Elon Musk has publicly endorsed Trump and restored his X account after it was suspended for over a year following the January 6 insurrection. Trump gained over a million followers in July, but just as we saw on TikTok, many of these followers were not joining because of Vance or even in defiance of Harris entering the race. More than 300,000 of these new followers came within two days of the assassination attempt.

In what must have been a crushing blow for the Trump campaign, Harris entering the race was simply more interesting than Trump's appointment of Ohio Sen. JD Vance to his presidential ticket.

Harris' X account, though, increased by nearly the same number, and one could argue she actually grew by a larger rate than Trump when you factor in her campaign’s rapid-response account, @KamalaHQ, which was rebranded from @BidenHQ. Both Harris accounts saw about 800,000 new followers in the week after her announcement.

This is especially bad for Trump considering how firmly Musk has his thumb on the scales when it comes to what accounts can do well on X. Even if Trump is solidly committed to Truth Social, his base is all in on X. Pew’s report found that Democratic X users are less likely to trust the news they see on X, and the platform in general, than they were before Musk’s takeover. X has been accused of rate-limiting Harris' account, and briefly suspended the “White Dudes for Harris” fundraising group last week. Even when the platform is rigged in Trump's favor, he's still not dominating.

Meanwhile, in the 24 hours since Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz was announced as Harris’ running mate, his following on X increased by 50%. Again, to put that in context, Vance gained 60% in the first 24 hours after his announcement, and he started with about twice as many followers. Like Harris, however, Walz grew much faster on Instagram, with his follower count increasing over 140% in 24 hours.

The takeaway: if you look at social media as a whole, Harris and now Walz are dominating the conversation. Trump is still on top on X but not as comfortably as he should be if you account for Musk's alleged meddling. Which, at least at this point in the election, puts things into an interesting binary. Can X, even in its chaotic state, be influential enough to throw an election? Or have conservatives bet on the wrong filter bubble?


Garbage Day is an award-winning newsletter that focuses on web culture and technology, covering a mix of memes, trends, and internet drama. We also run a program called Garbage Intelligence, a monthly report tracking the rise and fall of creators and accounts across every major platform on the web. And we'll be sharing some of our findings here in Sherwood. You can subscribe to Garbage Day here.

More Power

See all Power
power
Jake Lahut

Strait of Hormuz is closed to all oil tankers and commercial ships, Iran military says

In retaliation to US strikes, the Islamic Republic of Iran announced that the Strait of Hormuz is fully closed as of early Thursday morning in Tehran. The attacks from the US were separate from a series of retaliatory drone and missile launches overnight Tuesday into Wednesday.

President Donald Trump told Fox News in a phone interview on Wednesday night that “the bombing will stop soon,” but if Iran doesn’t sign the agreement put forward by special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, “we’ll bomb the shit out of them tomorrow night.”

When asked whether the ceasefire still stands, Trump described it as “the most violated ceasefire in the history of the world,” per Fox News.

According to Al Jazeerah, Iran’s Mehr news agency reported that Iran’s joint military command specified that any oil tankers or other commercial vessels will be attacked if they attempt to cross the strait.

This is the second day in a row hostilities have resumed to a level not seen since the early April ceasefire was announced.

US CENTCOM announced the series of strikes beginning at 5:15 p.m. ET on Wednesday, which Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth previewed in on-camera remarks, promising to “strike ’em hard tonight” before later saying he would not broadcast whether the military would take any action.

Shortly after the announcement on the closure of the Strait of Hormuz to all commercial vessel traffic, Iranian state media reported that two ships attempting to cross were attacked.

This story is developing.

President Donald Trump told Fox News in a phone interview on Wednesday night that “the bombing will stop soon,” but if Iran doesn’t sign the agreement put forward by special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, “we’ll bomb the shit out of them tomorrow night.”

When asked whether the ceasefire still stands, Trump described it as “the most violated ceasefire in the history of the world,” per Fox News.

According to Al Jazeerah, Iran’s Mehr news agency reported that Iran’s joint military command specified that any oil tankers or other commercial vessels will be attacked if they attempt to cross the strait.

This is the second day in a row hostilities have resumed to a level not seen since the early April ceasefire was announced.

US CENTCOM announced the series of strikes beginning at 5:15 p.m. ET on Wednesday, which Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth previewed in on-camera remarks, promising to “strike ’em hard tonight” before later saying he would not broadcast whether the military would take any action.

Shortly after the announcement on the closure of the Strait of Hormuz to all commercial vessel traffic, Iranian state media reported that two ships attempting to cross were attacked.

This story is developing.

power
Jake Lahut

United States and Iran trade retaliatory strikes, escalating war and rattling ceasefire

The war in Iran is heating back up. Overnight, both sides have been trading hostilities in a series of retaliations to other retaliations.

It marks the most robust escalation in combat since the April 8 ceasefire announcement.

Oil prices were little changed, with Brent crude futures down 0.48% as of 5:30 a.m. ET. At the same time, S&P 500 futures were down nearly 0.7% and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite had slipped 1.18%, as the escalations compounded a broader AI sell-off.

Travel stocks, like United Airlines and Royal Caribbean, which got a boost on Tuesday as oil prices fell, lost some of those gains in premarket trading. Meanwhile, oil giants such as Chevron and Exxon ticked higher and chipmakers such as Arm Holdings and Micron continued to slip.

The escalation ladder began ratcheting back up when Iran shot down an American helicopter with a drone while it was patrolling the Strait of Hormuz, a US official told NBC News. US forces then conducted strikes in Iran’s Qeshm Island, Sirik, Jask, and Bandar Abbas, according to Al Jazeera. In response, Iran attacked a US fleet in Bahrain, Al Jazeera also reported.

“The Iranians are trying to make clear that any attack on them would be responded to, regardless of the size and the scope,” Trita Parsi of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft in the US told Al Jazeera. “Now, of course, whether they are seeking to escalate the situation or de-escalate remains to be seen, and it will be very much measured by how they calibrated their response by attacking these US bases.”

The scope of the strikes and counterstrikes broadened out as of early Wednesday morning in Iran. Kuwait activated its air defense systems to intercept strikes, its army announced.

Mohamed Vall, a reporter for Al Jazeera reporting from inside Iran, described “a lot of activity in terms of air defence by the Iranians, and they talked about the downing of a helicopter, an American MQ-9 [drone] over Bushehr. So that gives you an idea about the scope of these attacks and counterattacks, or these retaliations across the Strait of Hormuz and the Gulf region tonight.”

Iran’s IRGC also reported targeting a hangar for American F-35 jets in Jordan, Al Jazeera reported.

Oil prices were little changed, with Brent crude futures down 0.48% as of 5:30 a.m. ET. At the same time, S&P 500 futures were down nearly 0.7% and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite had slipped 1.18%, as the escalations compounded a broader AI sell-off.

Travel stocks, like United Airlines and Royal Caribbean, which got a boost on Tuesday as oil prices fell, lost some of those gains in premarket trading. Meanwhile, oil giants such as Chevron and Exxon ticked higher and chipmakers such as Arm Holdings and Micron continued to slip.

The escalation ladder began ratcheting back up when Iran shot down an American helicopter with a drone while it was patrolling the Strait of Hormuz, a US official told NBC News. US forces then conducted strikes in Iran’s Qeshm Island, Sirik, Jask, and Bandar Abbas, according to Al Jazeera. In response, Iran attacked a US fleet in Bahrain, Al Jazeera also reported.

“The Iranians are trying to make clear that any attack on them would be responded to, regardless of the size and the scope,” Trita Parsi of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft in the US told Al Jazeera. “Now, of course, whether they are seeking to escalate the situation or de-escalate remains to be seen, and it will be very much measured by how they calibrated their response by attacking these US bases.”

The scope of the strikes and counterstrikes broadened out as of early Wednesday morning in Iran. Kuwait activated its air defense systems to intercept strikes, its army announced.

Mohamed Vall, a reporter for Al Jazeera reporting from inside Iran, described “a lot of activity in terms of air defence by the Iranians, and they talked about the downing of a helicopter, an American MQ-9 [drone] over Bushehr. So that gives you an idea about the scope of these attacks and counterattacks, or these retaliations across the Strait of Hormuz and the Gulf region tonight.”

Iran’s IRGC also reported targeting a hangar for American F-35 jets in Jordan, Al Jazeera reported.

power

New York legislature passes 1-year data center moratorium

The New York state legislature has passed a one-year ban on large data centers in the state.

The bill now heads to Gov. Kathy Hochul’s desk, where it faces an uncertain fate. If Hochul signs the bill, it would become the first such statewide ban to succeed in becoming law.

That’s far from certain, as Hochul has opposed state-level legislation over data centers. In May, Hochul said, “This is a local decision for municipalities, its land use, which is the purview of local governments. It’s not a statewide approach necessarily, but its something Im looking at intensely.”

In April, Maine Gov. Janet Mills vetoed a similar statewide moratorium on data centers.

Opposition to data centers is growing rapidly across the US. A federal data center moratorium bill was introduced in March, and at least 14 states have proposed pauses on data center construction, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

That’s far from certain, as Hochul has opposed state-level legislation over data centers. In May, Hochul said, “This is a local decision for municipalities, its land use, which is the purview of local governments. It’s not a statewide approach necessarily, but its something Im looking at intensely.”

In April, Maine Gov. Janet Mills vetoed a similar statewide moratorium on data centers.

Opposition to data centers is growing rapidly across the US. A federal data center moratorium bill was introduced in March, and at least 14 states have proposed pauses on data center construction, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

EU Commission Vice-President Virkkunen and Commissioner Jorgensen hold press conference

EU proposes “tech sovereignty package” to bolster domestic AI and chip industries

Europe is hastening its breakup with US tech as the Trump administration’s grip on American tech companies tightens.

power

White House releases watered-down executive order on AI

The White House released a weakened executive order on AI on Tuesday, a little more than a week after killing a previous version of the order after what was reportedly intense, direct lobbying of the Oval Office by tech executives.

The order’s most significant change to what was reported in late May is a shortened window of voluntary government review of new models from 90 days to 30 days.

After Anthropic’s Mythos model spooked companies and governments around the world, the White House was reportedly ready to respond with an executive order that would have given the government access to unreleased frontier models for up to 90 days before public release, to ensure safety.

Top AI companies were briefed on the proposed executive order, and a White House event with an extensive roster of tech executives was ready to go, but it was killed at the last minute, according to reports. Axios reported that last-minute lobbying by former White House AI and Crypto Czar David Sacks, along with other tech executives, helped convince President Trump to kill the order. Trump told reporters, “I didn’t like certain aspects of it. I postponed it.”

The now finalized order calls for the creation of an “AI cybersecurity clearinghouse” in concert with the AI industry, and directs national security agencies to develop and maintain a “classified benchmarking process” to review the capabilities of new frontier models.

After Anthropic’s Mythos model spooked companies and governments around the world, the White House was reportedly ready to respond with an executive order that would have given the government access to unreleased frontier models for up to 90 days before public release, to ensure safety.

Top AI companies were briefed on the proposed executive order, and a White House event with an extensive roster of tech executives was ready to go, but it was killed at the last minute, according to reports. Axios reported that last-minute lobbying by former White House AI and Crypto Czar David Sacks, along with other tech executives, helped convince President Trump to kill the order. Trump told reporters, “I didn’t like certain aspects of it. I postponed it.”

The now finalized order calls for the creation of an “AI cybersecurity clearinghouse” in concert with the AI industry, and directs national security agencies to develop and maintain a “classified benchmarking process” to review the capabilities of new frontier models.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.