Power
US-DNA-TESTING
(Eric Baradat/Getty Images)

What Regeneron’s purchase of 23andMe means for the millions of people’s DNA it now owns

Experts say the deal is a “best-case scenario” in a world where privacy protections are lax.

J. Edward Moreno

A pharmaceutical company that specializes in making DNA-based research agreed to buy 23andMe out of bankruptcy, averting a worst-case scenario as the genetic data of millions of consumers was auctioned off.

Regeneron bought 23andMe for $256 million, the company announced Monday morning. Leading up to the deal, millions of consumers who mailed 23andMe vials of their saliva to learn about their ancestry worried about where their genetic data might end up, so much so that it led to a spike in web traffic to the company’s website to delete their data.

Moving the data to the hands of a pharmaceutical company rather than to a surveillance tech firm, private equity, or data brokers should ostensibly make its customers feel better. Regeneron said it would maintain 23andMe’s privacy policy, which in theory keeps consumers’ data as safe as it was before.

But that’s not saying much, according to Anya Prince, a law professor at the University of Iowa.

“From what we have heard and seen, Regeneron is more like 23andMe in terms of how they might steward the data,” Prince said. “So, in that way it’s the best-case scenario, but there’s not any guarantees in how they will do that going forward.”

For one, 23andMe’s privacy policy is subject to change at any time. Suzanne Bernstein, counsel at the nonprofit Electronic Privacy Information Center, said the bankruptcy highlights how few protections consumers have over their health data.

“When a consumer purchased their 23andMe kit, they could not have envisioned or meaningfully consented to their genetic sample being sold outside of that context,” Bernstein said. “The fact that this highly sensitive data is being sold for profit at all brings up some ethical questions.”

How may Regeneron use that data?

While Regeneron is at the forefront of genetic-based research for drugs and therapies, its most lucrative products were actually not discovered through genetics-driven drug discovery. Eylea, which prevents blindness in some patients, and its COVID-19 antibody cocktail are two of its highest-selling products, and they were not discovered through genetic research.

Still, genetic and health data is highly valuable. Advertising firms may use it to get a more pointed profile of a consumer, or government contractors could use it to track down or surveil civilians. (At $256 million, Regeneron scored each of the estimated 15 million users’ genetic data at $17 a pop, 404 Media noted.)

Bernstein said that consumers might assume their genetic information is protected under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or HIPAA, but that doesn’t apply to direct-to-consumer companies like 23andMe. Notably, Regeneron plans to keep 23andMe operating despite its dwindling sales.

“I don’t think they’re trying to emulate 23andMe’s business model; it’s more so that it seems to be an avenue to continue collecting genetic information,” she said.

More Power

See all Power
power
Jake Lahut

Who’s next to leave the Trump admin following Chavez-DeRemer’s departure?

After a few abandoned nominations and the occasional lateral demotion during President Donald Trumps first year in office, turnover has accelerated dramatically.

Just in the past month, top officials such as Attorney General Pam Bondi, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer have left their posts.

Following a report from The Atlantic alleging heavy drinking and absenteeism plaguing FBI Director Kash Patel, the odds of his departure from the Trump administration in 2026 shot up sharply, with traders now pricing in an 80% chance he won’t last the year.

(Event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC — probabilities referenced or sourced from KalshiEx LLC or ForecastEx LLC.)

Loading...
 

Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, is another official who could be on the ropes. Her deputy, Joe Kent, has already resigned over the Iran war. Gabbards 2020 presidential campaign — and appeal in broadening Trumps electorate in 2024 — heavily centered around ending perpetual regime change wars. The White House has indicated to Gabbard that they want her gone before the midterms, but the timing of her departure remains vague, according to two sources familiar with the discussions who spoke to Sherwood News in recent weeks.

As for who will replace the outgoing members, pay attention to who can be confirmed by the Senate. To replace Bondi, a Trump adviser told Sherwood the most likely replacements are acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, Trumps former personal attorney, as well as EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin.

Loading...
 

Following a report from The Atlantic alleging heavy drinking and absenteeism plaguing FBI Director Kash Patel, the odds of his departure from the Trump administration in 2026 shot up sharply, with traders now pricing in an 80% chance he won’t last the year.

(Event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC — probabilities referenced or sourced from KalshiEx LLC or ForecastEx LLC.)

Loading...
 

Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, is another official who could be on the ropes. Her deputy, Joe Kent, has already resigned over the Iran war. Gabbards 2020 presidential campaign — and appeal in broadening Trumps electorate in 2024 — heavily centered around ending perpetual regime change wars. The White House has indicated to Gabbard that they want her gone before the midterms, but the timing of her departure remains vague, according to two sources familiar with the discussions who spoke to Sherwood News in recent weeks.

As for who will replace the outgoing members, pay attention to who can be confirmed by the Senate. To replace Bondi, a Trump adviser told Sherwood the most likely replacements are acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, Trumps former personal attorney, as well as EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin.

Loading...
 
$1.4B

In an effort to cement control ahead of SpaceX’s IPO, Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk bought $1.4 billion in shares of the rocket company from current and former employees last year, The Information reports, citing the confidential IPO prospectus.

The filing also revealed a moon shot incentive plan for the boss: Musk stands to gain 60 million more shares if SpaceX’s market cap increases to as high as $6.6 trillion and it completes a plan to build AI data centers in space. For its June IPO, the company is targeting a more than $2 trillion valuation.

power
Jake Lahut

Lori Chavez-DeRemer out at Department of Labor

Lori Chavez-DeRemer resigned as President Donald Trumps labor secretary on Monday, sources familiar with the matter told NOTUS.

Her tenure at the department was mired in scandal, including her husband being barred from headquarters after women employees reported he had touched them inappropriately. Chavez-DeRemer and a top aide reportedly texted women on staff to pay attention to the secretarys husband and her father around the office, according to The New York Times.

The departments inspector general had been investigating those messages and personal requests made of staff members.

power
Jon Keegan

Report: Anthropic’s Amodei headed to White House to settle dispute

In February, President Trump called Anthropic “A RADICAL LEFT, WOKE COMPANY,” and said of the company’s Claude AI technology: “We don’t need it, we don’t want it, and will not do business with them again!”

Now, less than two months later, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei is scheduled to meet with White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles today, according to a report from Axios.

After being declared a supply chain risk to national security by the Pentagon, and then suing the government to block the action, Anthropic finds itself in a powerful position: it has announced that its new Mythos AI model is capable of planning and executing offensive cyberattacks, and therefore would be shared only with a close group of trusted partners for testing before wider release, leading the US Treasury to try to get its hands on the new model.

The White House meeting is expected to result in some sort of deal that settles the dispute with the company, per the report.

After being declared a supply chain risk to national security by the Pentagon, and then suing the government to block the action, Anthropic finds itself in a powerful position: it has announced that its new Mythos AI model is capable of planning and executing offensive cyberattacks, and therefore would be shared only with a close group of trusted partners for testing before wider release, leading the US Treasury to try to get its hands on the new model.

The White House meeting is expected to result in some sort of deal that settles the dispute with the company, per the report.

power
Jon Keegan

Maine is the first to pass a statewide ban on large data centers

The tide is turning against big AI data centers.

In addition to many cities and towns that have passed outright bans on data centers, lawmakers in at least 11 states have introduced legislation to pause their construction, citing the need to carefully study power and water usage of the facilities.

But Maine just became the first state to successfully pass a ban on large data centers. If Maine Governor Janet Mills signs the bill into law, new data centers that draw more than 20 gigawatts of power would be banned until late 2027, and the state would set up a mechanism to study the impact of data center energy usage.

Last month, a federal bill was introduced to block new data centers until AI regulation has been passed. The issue has been getting more attention in this election year, as voters in data center hubs like Virginia have soured on the facilities.

Look at the crumbling support among Virginians (America's first data center hot spot) for data centers:

But Maine just became the first state to successfully pass a ban on large data centers. If Maine Governor Janet Mills signs the bill into law, new data centers that draw more than 20 gigawatts of power would be banned until late 2027, and the state would set up a mechanism to study the impact of data center energy usage.

Last month, a federal bill was introduced to block new data centers until AI regulation has been passed. The issue has been getting more attention in this election year, as voters in data center hubs like Virginia have soured on the facilities.

Look at the crumbling support among Virginians (America's first data center hot spot) for data centers:

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC. Futures and event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC.