Tech
Data tunnel
(Getty Images)

AI is eating the startup world

Venture capitalists splurged $110 billion on AI startups last year.

Increasingly, the due diligence for getting an ambitious world-changing technology business funded starts with a simple question: how does it use AI?

If the answer is it doesn’t, don’t expect the global gatekeepers of startup capital to go out of their way to write you a check. According to new data out this week from analytics firm Dealroom, the AI funding frenzy continued at pace last year with ~$110 billion pouring into the sector globally, about 33% of the total investment in the entire VC space.

This figure included outsized funding rounds like AI’s poster child OpenAI raking in $6.6 billion and AI data-processing platform Databricks with an even more staggering $10 billion.

AI VC investment
Sherwood News

But the boom isn’t just limited to more established, later-stage companies. Even at the very earliest stages of the venture capital funding ladder — seed and pre-seed stages — the omnipresence of AI is staggering.

AI: In everything, everywhere, all at once

Last year we wrote about how Y Combinator — the world’s preeminent startup accelerator that has backed Airbnb, Reddit, and Stripe — was seeing an overwhelming influx of founders and startups working in AI.

Indeed, data from Y Combinator reveals that some 80% of the companies in its Startup Directory last year had “AI” in either the company name or description of what it does. Just five years ago, that proportion was only 15%.

Y Combinator proportion of startups with “AI” in name or description chart
Sherwood News

Clearly, there are multiple factors at play. Some are straightforward:

  • AI is progressing on a weekly or even daily basis, creating new opportunities for entrepreneurs to use AI as a tool in almost every industry.

Some are a bit more cynical, like FOMO, signaling, or playing the odds:

  • VC investors don’t want to miss out on the boom, with some blindly backing almost anything AI-adjacent.

  • Startup founders know that AI is the hot thing now, and are finding ways to incorporate it into their products... no matter what their original product idea was.

Winners and losers

Venture capital investing is inherently a high-risk endeavor. The typical model for a VC fund follows a power law and requires that one or two breakout mega-successes pay for the dozens of failures.

That law will undoubtedly play out again in the AI space. Most of the startups will fail as they scramble to figure out a viable business model. And raising billions isn’t always enough — Inflection AI, for one, made no money and had to fold its original generative-AI business even after raising $1.5 billion. Even the tech giants, like Meta, admitted earlier last year that the company is “scaling the product before it is making money,” pledging to spend up to $65 billion on AI this year.

Ultimately, it’s still unclear to almost everyone exactly where in the value chain the profit pools will finally accumulate. Will the infrastructure and chip providers like Nvidia be the ultimate winners? Or will it be the creators of the foundational models like OpenAI, Meta, or Alphabet? What about the downstream effects? Will Duolingo, a language-learning app, become completely obsolete because AI will provide perfect translation in real time? Or will AI enable Duolingo to build more powerful tools than ever before?

It’s still too early to tell, which is why the VC market has exploded in almost every vertical, even after the end of the global zero-interest rate era. After a record year in 2021, the VC world rightsized in 2022 and 2023 before a 30% jump in total capital raised last year, thanks primarily to a 62% growth in AI-related venture capital, while investments in the rest of tech fell 12%. VC investors can’t hang around on the sidelines.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

Elon Musk says Tesla Robotaxis are operating without drivers, sending stock higher

Tesla CEO Elon Musk said that Tesla’s Robotaxis are now operating in Austin without a safety monitor. Tesla has been testing driverless cars in the area for about a month, and Musk had previously said the company would remove safety drivers by the end of 2025.

It’s unclear how many exactly of the roughly 50 Robotaxis the company operates in the area don’t have drivers. “Starting with a few unsupervised vehicles mixed in with the broader robotaxi fleet with safety monitors, and the ratio will increase over time,” Tesla head of AI Ashok Elluswamy posted shortly after Musk. Ethan McKenna, the person behind Robotaxi Tracker, estimates it's two or three vehicles.

What is clear is that the move is good for Tesla’s stock, which is currently up 3.5%, extending its gains after Musk’s tweet. Morgan Stanley said yesterday that it considers the removal of safety drivers a “precursor to personal unsupervised FSD rollout.” Unsupervised FSD is widely considered to be integral to the would-be autonomous company’s value proposition.

At Davos earlier on Thursday, Musk said, "self-driving cars is essentially a solved problem at this point."

tech

Survey: CEOs and workers have wildly different thoughts on AI productivity gains

One of the main reasons companies are rushing to adopt AI is to give their workers the miraculous productivity boost that AI companies have been promising — and believe will quickly earn back their investment.

But now that companies have been using AI for a while, a growing perception gap is emerging between the C-suite and their employees.

The Wall Street Journal reported on new findings by research firm Section, which surveyed 5,000 white-collar workers from companies with more than 1,000 employees.

More than 70% of the corporate executives in the survey said they were “excited” by AI, and 19% of them said the tools have saved them more than 12 hours of work per week.

But nonmanagement workers had a very different take on AI. Almost 70% of this group said AI made them feel “anxious or overwhelmed,” and 40% said the tools saved them no time at all.

The Wall Street Journal reported on new findings by research firm Section, which surveyed 5,000 white-collar workers from companies with more than 1,000 employees.

More than 70% of the corporate executives in the survey said they were “excited” by AI, and 19% of them said the tools have saved them more than 12 hours of work per week.

But nonmanagement workers had a very different take on AI. Almost 70% of this group said AI made them feel “anxious or overwhelmed,” and 40% said the tools saved them no time at all.

tech

Tesla jumps as Musk says he expects Optimus sales next year, European and Chinese FSD approval next month

Tesla CEO Elon Musk now says he thinks the company’s Optimus robots will be for sale to the public “by the end of next year.”

According to Musk, “That’s when we are confident that there is very high reliability, very high safety, and the range of functionality is also very high.”

Like many of Musk’s other timelines, that’s later than he previously predicted. In 2024, for example, Musk said the AI robots would be for sale in 2025.

Speaking with BlackRock CEO Larry Fink on a panel today at the World Economic Forum, Musk said the robots are currently doing “simple tasks” in Tesla factories, but believes “they’ll be doing more complex tasks and be deployed in an industrial environment” by the end of this year, before going on sale to the public in 2027.

Musk forecasts a future with “billions” of AI robots that “saturate all human needs.”

On a separate topic, Musk was bullish on regulatory approval for what Tesla calls Full Self-Driving technology in markets outside the US. “We hope to get supervised Full Self-Driving approval in Europe, hopefully next month, and then maybe a similar timing for China,” he said. Musk has said in the past that the pending regulatory approval for FSD in Europe is a key reason why Tesla’s sales in the region have been tanking.

tech

Waymo is now offering autonomous rides in Miami

Google subsidiary Waymo announced Thursday that it’s officially open for autonomous ride-hailing in Miami, expanding the company’s coverage area to six US cities. The company will be “inviting new riders on a rolling basis” to take rides across its 60-square-mile service area, which includes the Design District, Wynwood, Brickell, and Coral Gables. Waymo said it plans to expand to Miami International Airport “soon.”

Competitor Tesla currently operates a ride-hailing service with a safety monitor in the vehicle in Austin and the Bay Area.

tech

Apple to promote Siri from assistant to chatbot

Bloomberg reports that Apple plans to transform its Siri assistant into a full-fledged chatbot similar to OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

The chatbot would be integrated throughout the iPhone’s operating system rather than offered as a stand-alone app. It’s expected to arrive later this year and would be separate from more incremental, non-chatbot improvements to Siri rolling out in the coming months aimed at making the existing assistant more usable.

Both updates will be powered by Google’s AI models, Bloomberg reports, but the chatbot upgrade will be more advanced and akin to the much-lauded Gemini 3.

While the difference between an assistant and a chatbot may sound subtle, it represents a meaningful shift for Apple, which has long avoided a fully conversational interface and has lagged rivals that embraced one. Any new Siri chat capabilities could also eventually extend to other Apple devices under development, including wearables such as the pin Apple is developing.

Both updates will be powered by Google’s AI models, Bloomberg reports, but the chatbot upgrade will be more advanced and akin to the much-lauded Gemini 3.

While the difference between an assistant and a chatbot may sound subtle, it represents a meaningful shift for Apple, which has long avoided a fully conversational interface and has lagged rivals that embraced one. Any new Siri chat capabilities could also eventually extend to other Apple devices under development, including wearables such as the pin Apple is developing.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.