Tech
Allen & Co Brings Together Media And Tech Titans In Sun Valley
Google CEO Sundar Pichai in Sun Valley, Idaho (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Analysts like Google’s earnings report, even if investors didn’t

These analysts think doubling capex is a good sign.

Investors aren’t reacting positively to Google’s supercharged spending plans — the company said it will nearly double its capital expenditure this year — with the stock down about 4% today after reporting earnings Wednesday. But analysts are more upbeat.

Here’s a selection of recent reports:

Bank of America Global Research titled its note “Gemini halo effect shining bright,” arguing that “agentic capabilities and monetization of the Gemini app (750mn MAUs) with advertising are revenue catalysts ahead.” The firm’s analysts also cited record Google Search usage as evidence that AI is driving an “expansionary cycle,” not cannibalizing demand.

“We continue to see opportunity for better monetization of zero-click searches that are being converted to AI Overviews as a key upside driver from here,” they wrote.

Morgan Stanley Research analysts struck a similar bullish tone, arguing that Google’s accelerating revenue and sharply higher capital spending are reinforcing the advantages of the largest tech platforms. The firm said Alphabet is showing a “strong GenAI ROIC signal” across both Search and Google Cloud, likening the moment to Meta’s recent earnings-driven reset.

They noted that Search revenue rose 17% year over year while Google Cloud grew 48%, far ahead of expectations. Even more important for durability, Google Cloud backlog jumped 55% quarter over quarter to roughly $240 billion, signaling sustained demand for AI infrastructure and enterprise AI services.

“The leading scaled companies with the most data, reach and ability/willingness to invest are seeing the benefits of their flywheels,” the analysts wrote, arguing that the gap between megacaps and smaller tech players is likely to widen faster than previously expected.

Morningstar analyst Malik Ahmed Khan said the fourth-quarter results reinforced Alphabet’s shift from a perceived AI laggard to a “clear leader in AI,” with AI now driving growth across both Search and Cloud.

While investors remain wary of Alphabet’s nearly doubled capital spending, Morningstar called the mammoth plan a “vote of confidence in AI demand,” saying the company is well positioned to turn that investment into revenue across Search, Cloud, and emerging agentic use cases.

Wedbush Securities’ Dan Ives raised Alphabet’s price target to $370, citing strong fourth-quarter results that reinforced the company’s position as a “leading AI beneficiary.” Like the others, he cited strong Search and Cloud growth along with the Cloud revenue backlog.

While Alphabet’s projected $175 billion to $185 billion in 2026 capital spending is likely to pressure margins, the firm viewed the investment as supportive of long-term growth, pointing to rising Gemini adoption, expanding cloud margins, and early progress monetizing AI across Search and Cloud.

“We see additional opportunity to unlock more use cases and drive incremental monetization,” Ives wrote.

Deutsche Bank analysts also came out bullish, saying Alphabet delivered a strong quarter despite a “difficult setup” after the stock had already rallied about 20% since Q3.

While Deutsche acknowledged Alphabet’s 2026 capex guidance was well above consensus, it argued the spending will help build an infrastructure “moat that few (if any) can replicate — and perhaps just as importantly, one that Alphabet can best monetize” across its advertising, subscription, and cloud businesses.

Alphabet’s vertically integrated cloud strategy, which spans its own data centers, custom chips, software, and AI models, is increasingly resonating with customers, the analysts said. They noted that Google added more $1 billion-plus cloud deals in 2025 than in the prior three years combined, underscoring the strength of demand.

Deutsche raised its price target to $390 from $370.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.6 gains financial research, improved coding features

It’s a model-for-model battle between OpenAI and Anthropic, as the startups vie for dominance in AI coding tools.

Not to be outdone by OpenAI’s release today of GPT-5.2-Codex, Anthropic has released a new model that also improves its coding skills: Claude Opus 4.6.

According to the release, the new model now has the ability to perform financial research, adding new utility to its Claude Cowork tool, which recently gained new legal work capabilities that made investors bet against established software companies. This time, the news is sinking financial research firms like Factset and S&P Global.

Claude Opus 4.6 can help with longer, more complex coding projects, and perform more detailed debugging and code review tasks. It also features improvements for its ability to work with documents, spreadsheets, and presentations.

Anthropic says that the new model made strides in safety as well, showing extremely low rates of “misaligned behavior.”

According to the release, the new model now has the ability to perform financial research, adding new utility to its Claude Cowork tool, which recently gained new legal work capabilities that made investors bet against established software companies. This time, the news is sinking financial research firms like Factset and S&P Global.

Claude Opus 4.6 can help with longer, more complex coding projects, and perform more detailed debugging and code review tasks. It also features improvements for its ability to work with documents, spreadsheets, and presentations.

Anthropic says that the new model made strides in safety as well, showing extremely low rates of “misaligned behavior.”

tech

OpenAI releases its answer to Claude Code, first AI model with "high capability" risk for cybersecurity

AI agents that can write code have quickly become one of the most profitable, and competitive, applications coming from the current crop of AI startups.

Anthropic’s Claude Code is enjoying a moment of popularity among software engineers, and it is shoring up the startup’s revenue projections as it aims for an IPO this year. Claude Code's launch, along with Anthropic's release of Claude Cowork, which is aimed at non-technical users, has been a key force behind software stocks' massive recent underperformance.

Today OpenAI released its latest salvo in the AI code war: GPT-5.3-Codex, an “agentic coding” model that takes its name from OpenAI’s Codex coding app.

OpenAI says that GPT-5.3-Codex is the first model that was “instrumental in creating itself.”

According to the announcement, the new model can be used to build complex websites, interactive games, and achieved a new industry-wide high score on the widely used SWE-Bench Pro software development benchmark test.

But the model is also the first that OpenAI has released that comes with a “High capability” risk for cybersecurity, meaning that the company's evaluations showed that the tool had the potential to be used for sophisticated cyber attacks, though OpenAI says it has added mitigations to prevent such misuse.

Today OpenAI released its latest salvo in the AI code war: GPT-5.3-Codex, an “agentic coding” model that takes its name from OpenAI’s Codex coding app.

OpenAI says that GPT-5.3-Codex is the first model that was “instrumental in creating itself.”

According to the announcement, the new model can be used to build complex websites, interactive games, and achieved a new industry-wide high score on the widely used SWE-Bench Pro software development benchmark test.

But the model is also the first that OpenAI has released that comes with a “High capability” risk for cybersecurity, meaning that the company's evaluations showed that the tool had the potential to be used for sophisticated cyber attacks, though OpenAI says it has added mitigations to prevent such misuse.

tech

Google’s Gemini is gaining but OpenAI’s ChatGPT is still the AI chatbot leader

Following Alphabet’s stellar earnings report Wednesday, analysts were quick to declare that the Google parent had blossomed from an AI laggard into a leader. The company posted strong revenue and profit growth, driven in part by heavy investment in artificial intelligence, and noted that its Gemini app had grown to more than 750 million monthly active users.

Still, usage data suggest Gemini remains far behind the market leader — at least as far as usage.

While Gemini is growing faster than OpenAI’s ChatGPT — up 19% month over month versus 4% — it still trails by a wide margin in overall usage. In January, Gemini logged more than 2 billion global visits, according to new data from Similarweb, less than half of ChatGPT’s 5.7 billion.

tech

OpenAI’s Altman calls Anthropic an “authoritarian company” and says its Super Bowl ad is “deceptive”

Yesterday, Anthropic announced that it intends (for now) to keep its Claude chatbot free of ads. Competitors OpenAI, xAI, Meta, and Google all have expressed plans for ads in some form for their respective AI chatbots.

Anthropic also released cheeky ads depicting scenarios where people are asking questions to a personified version of their AI chatbot, only to recoil in confusion when the response transforms into a creepy ad.

It’s pretty clear that Anthropic was poking fun at the market-leading AI chatbot, ChatGPT. The characters playing the chatbot had the pitch-perfect tone of an eager-to-please ChatGPT session.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman tried to be a good sport, calling the ads funny, but clearly they struck a nerve, prompting a 400-word post on X in which he called the ads “deceptive,” accused Anthropic of “doublespeak,” and said it was an “authoritarian company” that was heading down a “dark path.”

Altman pushed back on the depiction of how such creepy ads could show up in chats, saying that OpenAI has pledged to never weave ads into chat conversations, knowing it users would reject that.

Previewing how the rival AI startups might battle each other in the marketplace, Altman attacked Anthropic’s focus on paid subscription, rather than generous limits for free users (which appears to be working out pretty well for Anthropic):

“Anthropic serves an expensive product to rich people. We are glad they do that and we are doing that too, but we also feel strongly that we need to bring AI to billions of people who can’t pay for subscriptions.”

Both companies are racing to launch an IPO this year, which will only raise the stakes for this billionaire beef.

tech

Part of the reason for Google’s huge capex plans: It has a $240 billion revenue backlog

Google reported strong earnings yesterday that beat analysts’ expectations. But the thing that caught investors’ attention was Google’s capex plans.

The company spent a whopping $91.4 billion for all of 2025 on capex, but it plans to roughly double that amount in 2026 to between $175 billion and $185 billion.

Why does it need to spend so much? It can’t keep up with demand due to constraints on its compute capacity. Cloud computing demand is surging, and Google simply can’t fulfill all of the orders it has, because it can’t build the data centers and AI infrastructure fast enough.

Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai was asked on last night’s earnings call what keeps him up at night:

“At this moment, maybe the top question is definitely around compute capacity. All the constraints, be it power, land, supply chain constraints — how do you ramp up to meet this extraordinary demand for this moment, get our investments right for the long term, and do it all in a way that we are driving efficiencies and doing it in a world-class way?”

Demand is so extraordinary that Google has $240 billion in “remaining performance obligations” (RPO, or revenue backlog).

This swelling backlog is not unique to Google. Microsoft just reported $625 billion in RPO, though a big chunk of that was for one customer: OpenAI. After market close today, we will see what Amazon’s RPO backlog looks like. It was $200 billion last quarter.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.