Tech
Apple CEO Tim Cook
Apple CEO Tim Cook attends the opening ceremony of the China Development Forum in Beijing on March 23, 2025 (Adek Berry/Getty Images)

Apple slumps as big iPhone sales that drove earnings and sales beat may be tariff-fueled one-off

Revenue and EPS beat analyst expectations.

Rani Molla

Apple beat analysts’ expectations, bringing in adjusted earnings per share of $1.65 (the FactSet consensus estimate was $1.62) and revenue of $95.4 billion (analysts forecast $94.5 billion). Its iPhone revenue was $46.8 billion, compared to the $45.97 billion analysts expected and up about 2% from the $45.96 billion it was in Q2 2024.

Apple is trading down after-hours.

While overall sales were strong, revenues from China declined and missed estimates, and its services sales were also a touch light.

Moreover, there’s concern that its iPhone sales, which notably exceeded expectations, represent a one-off pulling forward of demand from customers worried that tariffs will drive up its costs.

Investors will be focused on any color about how and where Apple is moving its supply chain and how these trade levies might affect the company.

The Trump administration’s tariffs on China stand to hurt Apple more than any other Big Tech company. Apple makes about 75% of its revenue from physical products, including iPhones and Macs that are mostly made in China, where tariffs are as high as 145%. Apple and other semiconductor-based electronics companies were recently granted an exemption from those tariffs only to learn they were simply being thrown into other buckets, whose levies have yet to be specified.

The Financial Times recently reported that Apple was trying to move all of its manufacturing for iPhones for the US market to India next year.

Apple had faced sluggish iPhone sales, with a year-over-year iPhone revenue decline last quarter. Additionally, it’s been lagging its peers in the AI space and has delayed a number of AI features from its iPhone 16 — something that culminated in a personnel shakeup and may be slowing new purchases of its flagship product even more.

Apple has also been beset by legal troubles recently.

Following its own antitrust trial back in 2021, Apple was told to enable third parties to direct customers off the App Store to make in app-purchases. Apple did so but charged a 27% commission on purchases that happened on those third-party websites — a work-around that a federal judge yesterday forbade it from doing in a ruling that could cost the company billions in revenue each year.

And as part of Google’s antitrust remediation, Apple also stands to lose the roughly $20 billion a year it gets from the search giant to be the default browser on iPhones.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

T-Mobile and Verizon are seeing strong iPhone sales, too

T-Mobile and Verizon are seeing strong demand for the latest iPhone, according to a note today from Bank of America Global Research:

As per T-Mobile mgmt., iPhone activations are up double digits (new and existing customers). Verizon mgmt. commentary also suggests strong upgrade activity in its existing base during the quarter.

This is one of several indicators pointing to a strong upgrade cycle for the redesigned iPhone.

Early this month, a survey of iPhone users found that a higher percentage intended to upgrade than did last year. BofA and Wedbush Securities’ Dan Ives have both cited longer shipment times for the latest model than last year, suggesting relatively higher demand. The Information said that Apple asked suppliers to boost production of the iPhone 17 following strong preorder activity. Bloomberg reported long lines and sold-out phones when the devices went on sale last week. BGR noted today that the iPhone 17 and iPhone 17 Pro are still sold out online in the US.

Last week, Sherwood News reported that web traffic to Apple for the iPhone event and for the preorder period were elevated compared with the past few years, though we suggested that might have more to do with a natural upgrade cycle than features on the iPhone 17.

Data center vs office spending

The AI infrastructure debate’s heating up, as spending on data centers set to outpace office construction

Multiple gargantuan data center projects got announced this week — some people see huge risks of fruitless spending, while others, like Sam Altman, think the build-out could be too slow.

Waymo Recalls Over 1200 Driverless Cars After Collisions Related To Software

Waymo, Lyft, Tesla: Who’s behind the wheel of the US robotaxi industry?

When it comes to autonomous ride hailing, no company is an island — except maybe Tesla. We mapped out the relationships.

tech

Report: Meta has discussed using Google’s AI to help with ads

Meta has a huge advertising business, and it wants it to get even bigger with the help of AI, with ambitions to create tools that will help businesses create, place, and track ads with just a quick conversation with an AI chatbot. But it seems the social media company, whose AI models have lagged its competitors and which is spending gobs of money to fix it, might need some help getting there. The Information reports that Meta has been in talks with Google to use the latter’s AI models to improve its ad business.

It may be an interim step for Meta, but it’s a big deal, as The Information notes:

The fact that Meta is considering using Google’s technology for advertising is striking. Advertising is the engine behind Meta’s $164.5 billion revenue empire, and Meta executives have highlighted improvements to advertising as a top opportunity coming out of the company’s investments in AI.

It may be an interim step for Meta, but it’s a big deal, as The Information notes:

The fact that Meta is considering using Google’s technology for advertising is striking. Advertising is the engine behind Meta’s $164.5 billion revenue empire, and Meta executives have highlighted improvements to advertising as a top opportunity coming out of the company’s investments in AI.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.