Tech
Microsoft Celebrates Its 50th Anniversary With Copilot AI Event
Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman (Stephen Brashear/Getty Images)

Microsoft falls as it lays out plan for “Humanist Superintelligence” without OpenAI

Microsoft AI’s CEO explained its vision for superintelligence that prioritizes human control.

Rani Molla

Microsoft stock is down 2% after the company announced it is developing its own superintelligence team to pursue AI that surpasses humans, but also keeps humans in charge. The so-called “Humanist Superintelligence” (not to be confused with Meta’s regular superintelligence) will have “incredibly advanced AI capabilities that always work for, in service of, people and humanity more generally,” AI Chief Executive Mustafa Suleyman wrote.

It’s also Microsoft’s first attempt at achieving artificial general intelligence without OpenAI, which it’s now free to do after it renegotiated their partnership. In an interview with The Wall Street Journal, Suleyman praised the companies’ work together but also criticized chatbots that feel too human and trick people into thinking they’re sentient — a criticism others have leveled at OpenAI’s ChatGPT, which is widely considered to be leading the way with AI. While the two companies are continuing to work together, it’s also clear that Microsoft thinks it can make AI progress on its own.

AI is also very expensive — something that’s given investors pause lately as they wonder just how companies will pay for their giant capital outlays and how those will ultimately pay off. Meta last week took a big dive, partly because investors don’t see a clear route from the social media company’s massive AI infrastructure spending to revenue, since it’s not renting that infrastructure as a cloud business.

Even Microsoft, which has a robust cloud business, hasn’t escaped investor scrutiny over AI spending. Despite beating revenue and earnings expectations last week, the company’s stock fell in part because the company reversed its guidance on capital spending, now saying it would continue to rise instead of taper off.

Regardless of how humane it might be, the pursuit of superintelligence — and the talent and infrastructure it involves — will cost those who dare try it. And the payoffs are still unclear.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

Report: China seeking access to Anthropic’s Mythos model

Anthropic’s unreleased AI model Mythos has sent shock waves through companies and governments around the world, fearful of what the model will mean for cybersecurity. Even the US Treasury department scrambled to secure access to harden its defenses ahead of a wide release.

Anthropic is currently only sharing access to Mythos to a short list of companies and government agencies.

The New York Times is reporting that China is seeking access to Mythos as well, setting off alarms in the White House. At a Singapore conference last month, an employee from a Chinese think tank reportedly approached representatives from Anthropic, seeking access to Mythos — a move that was interpreted in Washington as a potential effort to secure access for the Chinese government. According to the report, Anthropic declined that request.

As AI models rapidly gain powerful new capabilities, the US government is wrestling over what kinds of controls (if any) it should apply to prevent American technology from being used by our rivals.

The Washington Post is reporting that an executive order from the Trump administration may be imminent that would allow US intelligence agencies to evaluate new AI models before release.

The New York Times is reporting that China is seeking access to Mythos as well, setting off alarms in the White House. At a Singapore conference last month, an employee from a Chinese think tank reportedly approached representatives from Anthropic, seeking access to Mythos — a move that was interpreted in Washington as a potential effort to secure access for the Chinese government. According to the report, Anthropic declined that request.

As AI models rapidly gain powerful new capabilities, the US government is wrestling over what kinds of controls (if any) it should apply to prevent American technology from being used by our rivals.

The Washington Post is reporting that an executive order from the Trump administration may be imminent that would allow US intelligence agencies to evaluate new AI models before release.

tech

Reuters report pours water on Tesla’s Texas Robotaxi expansion

Nearly a month after Tesla announced that its Robotaxis had expanded to Houston and Dallas, reporters from Reuters say the service is still in a “beta-testing phase.”

They reported long wait times — when the service was available at all — and drop-offs that were 15-minute walks from the intended destination. In one instance, a reporter waited nearly two hours for a Robotaxi to arrive to take a trip that should have been a 20-minute drive, and after that long pickup wait time, experienced a circuitous route and a drop-off distant from the intended destination.

When the service launched in Houston and Dallas, we observed it included just one driverless Robotaxi in each. (Notably, the company’s existing services in Austin and the Bay Area still have safety monitors present on most rides.) Now, data from Robotaxi Tracker still shows a single driverless vehicle available in the past week in Dallas, and three in Houston.

As we noted during Tesla’s most recent earnings report, the company has updated its language around the half dozen markets it had planned to expand to in the first half of this year to say that “preparations [are] underway.”

Robotaxis, of course, are central to Tesla’s value proposition, which has pivoted from vehicles to autonomy and AI.

When the service launched in Houston and Dallas, we observed it included just one driverless Robotaxi in each. (Notably, the company’s existing services in Austin and the Bay Area still have safety monitors present on most rides.) Now, data from Robotaxi Tracker still shows a single driverless vehicle available in the past week in Dallas, and three in Houston.

As we noted during Tesla’s most recent earnings report, the company has updated its language around the half dozen markets it had planned to expand to in the first half of this year to say that “preparations [are] underway.”

Robotaxis, of course, are central to Tesla’s value proposition, which has pivoted from vehicles to autonomy and AI.

tech

Amazon rolls out 30-minute delivery in 4 cities with plans to expand to dozens more

Amazon is officially escalating the logistics arms race with the rollout of Amazon Now, a new service promising 30-minute delivery on thousands of grocery items and household essentials — Amazon mentioned AirPods, laundry detergent, and toothpaste — across dozens of US cities. Currently live in Seattle, Atlanta, Dallas, and Philadelphia, the service leverages a network of hyperlocal micro-fulfillment centers “strategically placed close to where customers live and work” to bypass traditional shipping delays.

For orders more than $15, Prime members pay a $3.99 delivery fee per order, while non-Prime members pay $13.99. By targeting the need it right now market, Amazon is directly challenging the dominance of local convenience stores and quick-commerce rivals like Walmart and Instacart, betting that customers will pay a premium to have their impulse buys arrive before they even have time to rethink them.

This might trigger flashbacks for those who remember the dot-com bubble startups Webvan, which scheduled same-day grocery delivery in 30-minute intervals, or Kozmo.com, which offered one-hour delivery on convenient store basics and DVDs. The difference? While Webvan and Kozmo.com built their delivery networks from scratch before there was demand, Amazon is simply layering speed onto its already massive logistics engine and customer base.

For orders more than $15, Prime members pay a $3.99 delivery fee per order, while non-Prime members pay $13.99. By targeting the need it right now market, Amazon is directly challenging the dominance of local convenience stores and quick-commerce rivals like Walmart and Instacart, betting that customers will pay a premium to have their impulse buys arrive before they even have time to rethink them.

This might trigger flashbacks for those who remember the dot-com bubble startups Webvan, which scheduled same-day grocery delivery in 30-minute intervals, or Kozmo.com, which offered one-hour delivery on convenient store basics and DVDs. The difference? While Webvan and Kozmo.com built their delivery networks from scratch before there was demand, Amazon is simply layering speed onto its already massive logistics engine and customer base.

tech
Jon Keegan

OpenAI employees are cashing out their shares, dozens making $30 million each

OpenAI’s planned IPO later this year is expected to be one of the largest of all time. Employees who got equity early on are sure to reap a windfall when the company shares hit the public markets.

Often these pre-IPO shares can’t be cashed in until the company goes public, and many startups have longer lockup periods before employees can sell their shares.

But The Wall Street Journal reports that OpenAI has a relatively short two-year vesting period, and the company allowed employees to sell shares before the IPO via a tender offer, as long as they’ve reached the two-year mark.

According to the report, in October, more than 600 current and former OpenAI employees sold shares through this process, minting a cluster of new multimillionaires. The Journal said about 75 of those walked away with $30 million (the maximum sale amount for this offer).

But The Wall Street Journal reports that OpenAI has a relatively short two-year vesting period, and the company allowed employees to sell shares before the IPO via a tender offer, as long as they’ve reached the two-year mark.

According to the report, in October, more than 600 current and former OpenAI employees sold shares through this process, minting a cluster of new multimillionaires. The Journal said about 75 of those walked away with $30 million (the maximum sale amount for this offer).

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.