Tech
Take evasive action: Satellites are having to avoid collisions a lot more than they used to

Take evasive action: Satellites are having to avoid collisions a lot more than they used to

Take evasive action!SpaceX's Starlink satellites have been forced to perform more than 25,000 course corrections in the last six months to avoid collisions with other spacecraft and orbital debris, according to a report filed by the company at the end of June. That figure is double the number of maneuvers performed in the previous six months. Indeed, experts fear that the need to evade is only going to rise exponentially as the orbital environment gets busier — by 2028, some predict that SpaceX satellites would need to make as many as 1 million such maneuvers every six months.

The vastness of space…

May not be vast enough. Indeed, space debris — or space junk — is a growing problem. The European Space Agency currently tracks nearly 34,000 objects bigger than 10 centimeters in size, all classified as space debris. While some debris in lower Earth orbit can burn up on re-entry, debris left at higher altitudes of 36,000km+ can continue to orbit Earth for hundreds of years.

This space junk is contributing to the growing fear of an idea known as the Kessler Syndrome, in which a cycle of increased debris would cause increased collisions and so on and so forth, leading to Earth’s orbit becoming essentially unusable.

Fortunately, actual space collisions remain relatively rare — the last one came in 2021 when a Chinese satellite smashed into a rocket body left over from 1996. Aside from that, there have been no other unintentional collisions in the past 10 years. However, as SpaceX is planning to increase its current satellite count from 4,000 to 30,000 in the coming years, it seems that more and more collisions could be written in the stars.

More Tech

See all Tech
Mark Zuckerberg in the metaverse

RIP the metaverse

Meta seems to be winding down its metaverse ambitions. We took a look back at what the company was going for.

tech

Salesforce falls as Anthropic debuts Cowork tool

Salesforce is on track for its worst trading day in nearly two years, with shares down more than 6% Tuesday afternoon. One potential contributor: Anthropic’s release of Cowork, an autonomous digital assistant for completing office tasks. Essentially, Cowork is an agent-based version of Anthropic’s Claude chatbot that can access and manipulate files, automate workflows, and execute tasks on a user’s behalf.

Salesforce watchers will recall that the SaaS giant has thrown its weight behind its own agent-based workplace AI, Agentforce, which CEO Marc Benioff recently described as one of the company’s two main “momentum drivers.” In December, Benioff said he would consider renaming the company "Agenforce."

tech

Google reaches record high and crosses $4 trillion market cap after major wins for Gemini

Google parent Alphabet closed yesterday at a record-high stock price of $331.86, giving the company a market capitalization just above $4 trillion, as investors reward a string of wins for its Gemini AI model, including high-profile partnerships with Apple and Walmart.

After months of speculation, Apple announced a multiyear partnership to use Gemini to power its AI assistant, Siri, a major endorsement of Google’s AI prowess. That same day, Walmart said it would partner with Google to let customers purchase products directly through the Gemini chatbot, a move that would put Gemini in front of millions of Walmart shoppers and test whether AI chatbots can drive real commerce at scale rather than isolated queries. (Amazon, OpenAI, and Microsoft are experimenting with similar AI shopping tools.)

The stock is up nearly 1% again in premarket trading today. While Microsoft and Apple have both crossed $4 trillion in the past, they’ve since dipped below it, leaving Google and Nvidia as the only companies currently valued above the threshold.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.