Tech
tech

OpenAI’s 1 million Enterprise users don’t come close to covering its massive costs

OpenAI now has more than a million ChatGPT Enterprise users. Hurray! Sort of.

That sounds great until you realize how much OpenAI is spending on operating costs: up to $7 billion this year on training and inference and another $1.5 billion on staff, according to a report from The Information this summer.

While prices per user likely vary by company and usage, let’s say each business seat costs $60 per month (which would be three times what it costs individuals since it comes with added features and safeguards). That would mean OpenAI is making more than $720 million a year off its business customers. A lot! But a far cry from $8.5 billion.

Throw in nearly $1 billion in annual revenues from its API business (again, per The Information), and the organization is still likely staring at a massive operating loss.

Of course, we don’t know how much revenue OpenAI is pulling in from partnerships (though it’s getting nothing from the Apple deal) or personal paid accounts. But if the company was relying on individuals alone, it would have to be a hell of a lot (more than 28 million users, say) to erase all of that red ink!

While prices per user likely vary by company and usage, let’s say each business seat costs $60 per month (which would be three times what it costs individuals since it comes with added features and safeguards). That would mean OpenAI is making more than $720 million a year off its business customers. A lot! But a far cry from $8.5 billion.

Throw in nearly $1 billion in annual revenues from its API business (again, per The Information), and the organization is still likely staring at a massive operating loss.

Of course, we don’t know how much revenue OpenAI is pulling in from partnerships (though it’s getting nothing from the Apple deal) or personal paid accounts. But if the company was relying on individuals alone, it would have to be a hell of a lot (more than 28 million users, say) to erase all of that red ink!

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

Apple’s hardware chief is the front-runner to be the next CEO

The New York Times is the latest news organization to cite Apple sources who think the company’s hardware chief, John Ternus, will be the one to fill CEO Tim Cook’s shoes. Citing people close to Apple, the publication reports that Cook is “tired and would like to reduce his workload” and that 50-year-old Ternus is the most likely to take his place, as the company accelerates its succession planning.

The Times is in good company. Both the Financial Times and Bloomberg have previously said Ternus is the top pick to succeed Cook at the helm of the tech giant, and Ternus is currently enjoying the top spot on prediction markets. His market-implied odds of being the next CEO are currently above 60% on both Polymarket and Kalshi event contracts.

The Times is in good company. Both the Financial Times and Bloomberg have previously said Ternus is the top pick to succeed Cook at the helm of the tech giant, and Ternus is currently enjoying the top spot on prediction markets. His market-implied odds of being the next CEO are currently above 60% on both Polymarket and Kalshi event contracts.

tech

Morgan Stanley: Even with Nvidia’s autonomous tech, Tesla is still “years ahead” of other automakers

Nvidia’s latest autonomous tech may help traditional automakers close the distance to manufacturing driverless cars, but not to Tesla, a research note from Morgan Stanley contends. Analyst Andrew Percoco argued that while Nvidia’s tech stack offers a “capital efficient on ramp to advanced autonomy,” that still leaves automakers stuck in a “faster follower strategy.”

According to the analyst, “Tesla is years ahead of competitors when it comes to autonomy with a clear data and scale advantage.” The comment is similar to something Tesla CEO Elon Musk said in the wake of Nvidia’s announcements:

“This is maybe a competitive pressure on Tesla in 5 or 6 years, but probably longer,” Musk posted on X.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.