Tech
Sam Altman at Italian Tech Week 2024
Sam Altman at Italian Tech Week 2024 (Stefano Guidi/Getty Images)

OpenAI’s leadership is in upheaval, but overall turnover looks shockingly low

We cross-checked the open letter most OpenAI employees signed against their publicly available employment data to see who stayed, who left, and where they work now.

OpenAI, the startup that has become synonymous with artificial intelligence itself, has seen a string of high-profile exits recently. 

Mira Murati, previously OpenAI’s chief technology officer, announced her departure last Wednesday. A few hours later, Bob McGrew, OpenAI’s chief research officer, and Barret Zoph, a vice president who ran a research team, both announced their resignations, too. They follow the departure of co-founders Ilya Sutskever and Andrej Karpathy, researcher Jan Leike and half of the entire AI safety research team, as well as an “extended leave of absence” for co-founder and president Greg Brockman. Only three of the 11 cofounders — Sam Altman, Wojciech Zaremba and technically Brockman — are still at the company.

Even though that seems like a serious shakeup since the board fired, and then brought back, Altman, the vast majority of OpenAI employees have stayed, according to a data analysis. During the Altman ouster saga last year, employees of OpenAI en masse signed an open letter in support of Altman — which gives us a snapshot of nearly every employee at the company at that time. We took all 702 names on the latest published version of the list we could find and asked Live Data Technologies to analyze how many OpenAI employees who signed the open letter have changed employers based on publicly available employment data sources, including LinkedIn, since November. 

The number is surprisingly low: despite the high-profile exits, only 41 out of the 702 people — or about 6% — who signed the open letter to the board have left the company as of September 2024, according to the Live Data analysis. Of course, publicly available data is imperfect — employees may not have up-to-date info on their social pages or may not have announced their departure, or there might not be publicly available data on certain employees at all. Still, when the data spans hundreds of employees, you can paint a pretty decent picture. 

A lot has changed at OpenAI since the Altman saga. Many of the company’s most important workers have left. And the roughly 770-employee non-profit has expanded drastically, becoming a 1,700-employee for-profit company. But its base of workers who were there when the Altman drama played out seems to have remained. 

Here are some notable moves at OpenAI since November, according to various press reports and employee posts. Many of the researchers and executives below did not sign the open letter.

  • Andrej Karpathy, co-founder and research scientist at OpenAI, left in February.

  • William Sauders, a member of the Superalignment team, which focuses on AI safety, left in February. 

  • Cullen O’Keefe, a policy researcher, left in April.

  • Daniel Kokotajlo, a researcher on OpenAI’s governance division, left in April. He said that he quit OpenAI because “due to losing confidence that it would behave responsibly around the time of AGI”.

  • Kokotajlo told Fortune that nearly half of the 30 or so OpenAI staff who worked on long-term AI safety has left the company, including Jan Hendrik Kirchner, Collin Burns, Jeffrey Wu, Jonathan Uesato, Steven Bills, Yuri Burda, Todor Markov and cofounder John Schulman. (Schulman and Bills both joined rival Anthropic, and both signed the open letter in November.)

  • Jan Leike, head of alignment, resigned in May and joined Anthropic. 

  • Ilya Sutskever, co-founder and chief scientist, left OpenAI to work on his own company Safe Superintelligence, in May. He was one of the board members who voted to fire Altman. 

  • Brockman said that he would take an extended leave of absence until the end of the year.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

Amazon to lay off thousands more office workers on path to 30,000 cuts

Amazon plans to axe thousands of corporate workers next week, after laying off 14,000 back in October, according to Reuters. The new cuts could be “roughly the same” number as last time and may hit Amazon Web Services, retail, Prime Video, and human resources, the report said, citing people familiar with the matter.

The company plans to cut a total of 30,000 corporate positions as part of an effort to “streamline operations and reset its culture,” Business Insider reported separately, noting comments from CEO Andy Jassy, who said the earlier layoffs were “about culture” rather than AI-related cost cutting.

The company plans to cut a total of 30,000 corporate positions as part of an effort to “streamline operations and reset its culture,” Business Insider reported separately, noting comments from CEO Andy Jassy, who said the earlier layoffs were “about culture” rather than AI-related cost cutting.

Little  Bay Beach

There are now more than 1 million “.ai” websites, contributing an estimated $70 million to Anguilla’s government revenue last year

Data from Domain Name Stat reveals that the top-level domain originally assigned to the British Overseas Territory of Anguilla passed the milestone in early January.

tech

TikTok closes deal to operate in the US

TikTok has finally sealed its deal to establish a majority American-owned joint venture to manage its US operations.

On Friday, the social media company announced that its US arm will now be led by three “managing investors” — Silver Lake, Oracle, and MGX, each with a 15% holding — while ByteDance retains 19.9% of the business, and a swath of other investors, including Michael Dell’s family office, round out the cap table.

The joint venture will be operated by a seven-person majority American board of directors, which includes TikTok CEO Shou Chew, with Adam Presser, previously TikTok’s head of operations, trust, and safety, as its CEO.

Though the valuation of the new venture has not been shared, Vice President JD Vance has previously cited the market value of TikTok’s US operations at about $14 billion, just topping Snap and lower than Pinterest.

The deal closes the platform’s battle, which kicked off in earnest in August 2020 when President Donald Trump first tried to ban TikTok over national security concerns. The announcement notes that the new TikTok USDS Joint Venture LLC will “secure U.S. user data, apps and the algorithm.” Trump celebrated the deal, which has been signed off by both the US and Chinese governments, per Reuters, in a Truth Social post, saying TikTok “will now be owned by a group of Great American Patriots and Investors, the Biggest in the World.”

tech
Rani Molla

Elon Musk says Tesla Robotaxis are operating without drivers, sending stock higher

Tesla CEO Elon Musk said that Tesla’s Robotaxis are now operating in Austin without a safety monitor. Tesla has been testing driverless cars in the area for about a month, and Musk had previously said the company would remove safety drivers by the end of 2025.

It’s unclear how many exactly of the roughly 50 Robotaxis the company operates in the area don’t have drivers. Tesla is “starting with a few unsupervised vehicles mixed in with the broader robotaxi fleet with safety monitors, and the ratio will increase over time,” Ashok Elluswamy, Tesla’s head of AI, posted shortly after Musk. Ethan McKenna, the person behind Robotaxi Tracker, estimates it’s two or three vehicles.

What is clear is that the move is good for Tesla’s stock, which is currently up 3.5%, extending its gains after Musk’s tweet. Morgan Stanley said yesterday that it considers the removal of safety drivers a “precursor to personal unsupervised FSD rollout.” Unsupervised Full Self-Driving is widely considered to be integral to the would-be autonomous company’s value proposition.

At the World Economic Forum earlier on Thursday, Musk said, “Self-driving cars is essentially a solved problem at this point.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.