Tech
tech

OpenAI’s record-breaking test score might have cost $30,000 per puzzle

In December, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman announced that its new o3 “reasoning” model had, for the first time, achieved a winning score on the ARC-AGI benchmark, a notoriously difficult test that had stumped all prior AI models.

But that power came at a steep price. The ARC Foundation (which maintains the test) estimated that the price for the “high compute” configuration of the winning test was about $3,400 per puzzle.

But OpenAI has not yet released the computing costs of its winning tests.

Last week, the ARC Foundation updated its leaderboard of test results, and o3’s winning score was no longer on the chart:

“Only systems which required less than $10,000 to run are shown. Notably missing from this chart is o3 (high compute). For more information on this see our announcement blog post.”

The ARC Foundation thinks the actual o3 costs are more in line with the superexpensive o1-pro model, which is the most expensive in the industry. Based on the sky-high pricing of the o1-pro model, that means it may have cost up to $30,000 of computation to solve each puzzle. The ARC Foundation wrote:

“o3 pricing costs have been updated to use o1-pro pricing. We will update again once official o3 pricing is publicly available. The amount of compute was roughly 172x the low-compute configuration.”

OpenAI did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

But that power came at a steep price. The ARC Foundation (which maintains the test) estimated that the price for the “high compute” configuration of the winning test was about $3,400 per puzzle.

But OpenAI has not yet released the computing costs of its winning tests.

Last week, the ARC Foundation updated its leaderboard of test results, and o3’s winning score was no longer on the chart:

“Only systems which required less than $10,000 to run are shown. Notably missing from this chart is o3 (high compute). For more information on this see our announcement blog post.”

The ARC Foundation thinks the actual o3 costs are more in line with the superexpensive o1-pro model, which is the most expensive in the industry. Based on the sky-high pricing of the o1-pro model, that means it may have cost up to $30,000 of computation to solve each puzzle. The ARC Foundation wrote:

“o3 pricing costs have been updated to use o1-pro pricing. We will update again once official o3 pricing is publicly available. The amount of compute was roughly 172x the low-compute configuration.”

OpenAI did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

Anthropic projections for 2028: Up to $70 billion in revenue, could be profitable by 2027

Anthropic’s Claude API business is doing so well with enterprise customers, the company is upping its revenue forecasts significantly. According to a report from The Information, the company’s robust corporate sales have revised their most optimistic forecast up to $70 billion in sales by 2028.

Anthropic estimates their API business will be double that of OpenAI’s API sales. OpenAI is currently burning much more money per month than Anthropic, and reportedly expects to burn as much as $115 billion through 2029, while Anthropic is expecting that it could be cash positive by 2027 according to the report.

Anthropic estimates their API business will be double that of OpenAI’s API sales. OpenAI is currently burning much more money per month than Anthropic, and reportedly expects to burn as much as $115 billion through 2029, while Anthropic is expecting that it could be cash positive by 2027 according to the report.

tech

Amazon, which is developing AI shopping agents, doesn’t want Perplexity’s AI shopping agents on its site

Amazon has sent a cease-and-desist letter to Perplexity AI, demanding that it stop letting its AI browser agent, Comet, make online purchases for users, Bloomberg reports.

Amazon, which is developing its own AI shopping agents and is having “conversations” with builders of third-party agents, accused the AI startup of “committing computer fraud by failing to disclose when its AI agent is shopping on a user’s behalf, in violation of Amazon’s terms of service.”

Perplexity, in response, said Amazon is attempting to “eliminate user rights” in order to sell more ads.

Amazon, which is developing its own AI shopping agents and is having “conversations” with builders of third-party agents, accused the AI startup of “committing computer fraud by failing to disclose when its AI agent is shopping on a user’s behalf, in violation of Amazon’s terms of service.”

Perplexity, in response, said Amazon is attempting to “eliminate user rights” in order to sell more ads.

tech

Apple to challenge Google Chromebooks with low-cost Mac laptop, Bloomberg reports

Apple is designing a new sub-$1,000 Mac laptop aimed at the education market, Bloomberg reports.

Google’s low cost Chromebooks currently dominate the K-12 education market, and Apple’s re-entry into the education market which it once owned could disrupt the sector's status quo.

According to the report, Apple plans on using the custom mobile chips it currently use in iPhones to power the more-affordable devices.

Apple’s recent earnings demonstrated that iPhone sales have been steady, and te tech giant is looking to find new areas of growth, like services. A low-cost Mac could be popular with consumers, in addition to education buyers.

According to the report, Apple plans on using the custom mobile chips it currently use in iPhones to power the more-affordable devices.

Apple’s recent earnings demonstrated that iPhone sales have been steady, and te tech giant is looking to find new areas of growth, like services. A low-cost Mac could be popular with consumers, in addition to education buyers.

tech

Getty Images suffers partial defeat in UK lawsuit against Stability AI

Stability AI, the creator of image generation tool Stable Diffusion, largely defended itself from a copyright violation lawsuit filed by Getty Images, which alleged the company illegally trained its AI models on Getty’s image library.

Lacking strong enough evidence, Getty dropped the part of the case alleging illegal training mid-trial, according to Reuters reporting.

Responding to the decision, Getty said in a press release:

“Today’s ruling confirms that Stable Diffusion’s inclusion of Getty Images’ trademarks in AI‑generated outputs infringed those trademarks. ... The ruling delivered another key finding; that, wherever the training and development did take place, Getty Images’ copyright‑protected works were used to train Stable Diffusion.”

Stability AI still faces a lawsuit from Getty in US courts, which remains ongoing.

A number of high-profile copyright cases are still working their way through the courts, as copyright holders seek to win strong protections for their works that were used to train AI models from a number of Big Tech companies.

Responding to the decision, Getty said in a press release:

“Today’s ruling confirms that Stable Diffusion’s inclusion of Getty Images’ trademarks in AI‑generated outputs infringed those trademarks. ... The ruling delivered another key finding; that, wherever the training and development did take place, Getty Images’ copyright‑protected works were used to train Stable Diffusion.”

Stability AI still faces a lawsuit from Getty in US courts, which remains ongoing.

A number of high-profile copyright cases are still working their way through the courts, as copyright holders seek to win strong protections for their works that were used to train AI models from a number of Big Tech companies.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.