Tech
tech
Rani Molla

Tesla’s ride-hailing service is looking a lot more like Uber’s than Waymo’s

Despite numerous promises about amassing a giant network of driverless cars, so far it seems like Tesla’s Robotaxis are a lot more similar to Uber’s plain old ride-hailing service than Waymo’s expanding autonomous fleet.

In California, where Tesla has its largest ride-hailing service, the company has taken no formal steps to gain approval for a truly driverless car service, according to Reuters. Throughout 2025, Tesla failed to log a single mile of autonomous test driving on state roads, and has not applied for the necessary permits to test or deploy vehicles without a human present. Currently, Tesla holds only a basic permit that requires a human safety monitor to remain in the driver’s seat at all times.

Currently, Tesla’s California Robotaxi service consists of roughly 300 Teslas operated by human drivers using the company’s supervised Full Self-Driving tech. In Austin, where the company has about 45 vehicles, Tesla made a big show earlier this year of announcing it was removing the safety monitors sitting in the front seats during rides. However, to date, only a handful of those vehicles have been reported to be actually operating without a safety monitor onboard.

In other words, it’s performing a service more akin to a tech-heavy Uber ride than the one operated by Alphabet subsidiary Waymo, which earlier this week announced it now has driverless rides available to the public in 10 markets. Even Uber is trying to put space between itself and the old driver-having Ubers of yore: this week its autonomous software partner said the company plans to launch a driverless service in London this year, with plans for 10 markets.

During its earnings report last month, Tesla said it planned to offer Robotaxi service in a half dozen new cities in the first half of this year, including Phoenix, Miami, and Las Vegas. Judging by Tesla’s progress so far, it’s likely those services will also feature a human in the front seat.

In California, where Tesla has its largest ride-hailing service, the company has taken no formal steps to gain approval for a truly driverless car service, according to Reuters. Throughout 2025, Tesla failed to log a single mile of autonomous test driving on state roads, and has not applied for the necessary permits to test or deploy vehicles without a human present. Currently, Tesla holds only a basic permit that requires a human safety monitor to remain in the driver’s seat at all times.

Currently, Tesla’s California Robotaxi service consists of roughly 300 Teslas operated by human drivers using the company’s supervised Full Self-Driving tech. In Austin, where the company has about 45 vehicles, Tesla made a big show earlier this year of announcing it was removing the safety monitors sitting in the front seats during rides. However, to date, only a handful of those vehicles have been reported to be actually operating without a safety monitor onboard.

In other words, it’s performing a service more akin to a tech-heavy Uber ride than the one operated by Alphabet subsidiary Waymo, which earlier this week announced it now has driverless rides available to the public in 10 markets. Even Uber is trying to put space between itself and the old driver-having Ubers of yore: this week its autonomous software partner said the company plans to launch a driverless service in London this year, with plans for 10 markets.

During its earnings report last month, Tesla said it planned to offer Robotaxi service in a half dozen new cities in the first half of this year, including Phoenix, Miami, and Las Vegas. Judging by Tesla’s progress so far, it’s likely those services will also feature a human in the front seat.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

Meta will surpass Google in ad revenue this year, new industry data shows

In a world supported by digital ad dollars, Meta may soon be king. The Instagram owner’s net digital ad revenues are expected to hit $243.5 billion in 2026, surpassing Google’s projected $239.5 billion, according to new data from eMarketer.

The shift is happening as Big Tech companies, including Meta and Google, are increasing their spending on AI in hopes that AI will grow their top and bottom lines.

On the company’s last earnings call, Meta CFO Susan Li credited AI with driving performance gains, and said that growth will continue: “We expect the set of investments we’re making in 2026 will enable us to drive further gains as we continue to integrate AI across all layers of the marketing and customer engagement funnel.”

“In surpassing Google, Meta has essentially had many of its core strategies validated,” said Max Willens, principal analyst at eMarketer. “Meta has long understood that scale, network effects, and habits are more important than anything else in digital media. It has carefully built and defended the advantages it has in all three areas.”

JAPAN-FOOD-DRINK-SCIENCE-REASEARCH-MSG-AJINOMOTO

What does delicious Asian food seasoning have to do with a potential bottleneck for AI chips?

Japanese food flavoring company Ajinomoto, which commercialized MSG, also makes a key component in AI chips. It’s having trouble scaling to meet demand.

tech

Report: Microsoft looks to remake Copilot in the image of OpenClaw

Microsoft is feeling the heat from all corners of the tech world as it tries to infuse its productivity apps with useful AI tools.

OpenAI, Anthropic, and now open-source OpenClaw are enabling powerful agentic AI that can do work on your computer for you — including productivity functions like managing emails, spreadsheets, and slide decks.

This is obviously an area where Microsoft needs to compete, or it will be left in the dust by AI startups.

The Information reports that Microsoft is indeed realizing this, and is now trying to reboot its many Copilot tools to act more like the extremely popular DIY agentic AI tool OpenClaw.

OpenClaw is usually set up running on a dedicated personal computer, and given access to all of a user’s permissions and logins. The user issues orders to OpenClaw through messaging apps like Telegram or WhatsApp, and the agent goes off and completes tasks in the background, notifying you when they’re done. But many users have had security disasters with the setup, so Microsoft is looking to borrow the popular concept but implement the strict security controls needed for use in enterprise environments.

According to the report, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella has made revamping 365 Copilot a top priority.

This is obviously an area where Microsoft needs to compete, or it will be left in the dust by AI startups.

The Information reports that Microsoft is indeed realizing this, and is now trying to reboot its many Copilot tools to act more like the extremely popular DIY agentic AI tool OpenClaw.

OpenClaw is usually set up running on a dedicated personal computer, and given access to all of a user’s permissions and logins. The user issues orders to OpenClaw through messaging apps like Telegram or WhatsApp, and the agent goes off and completes tasks in the background, notifying you when they’re done. But many users have had security disasters with the setup, so Microsoft is looking to borrow the popular concept but implement the strict security controls needed for use in enterprise environments.

According to the report, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella has made revamping 365 Copilot a top priority.

tech

Tesla competitor Slate closes $650 million funding round and says 2026 production is “on time and on budget”

Tesla competitor Slate Auto said it closed a $650 million Series C funding round led by TWG Global, giving it the “operating capital to reach the next stage of development.” Slate’s new CEO, Peter Faricy, says it has more than 160,000 reservations, up from 150,000 in December, and is “on time and on budget” to deliver its first mid-$20,000 electric trucks to customers by the end of 2026.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC. Futures and event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC.