Business
Buffett's buying: Berkshire Hathaway is investing again

Buffett's buying: Berkshire Hathaway is investing again

Berkshire buyin'

On Monday, iconic investor Warren Buffett announced that his firm Berkshire Hathaway had purchased a $4.1bn stake in Taiwanese chipmaker TSMC during the last few months. Known to have missed the early wave of investments in tech, passing early on Google and Amazon, Buffett and co. are now — selectively — embracing the industry. A 2016 investment in Apple has worked out spectacularly well, with the iPhone maker now Berkshire’s largest holding, equivalent to a 5.5% stake in the company.

Although notable, the TSMC investment still barely makes a dent in the holding company’s 12-figure outstanding cash pile. Berkshire’s $108bn is an amount that, at current market prices, could theoretically buy Lululemon ($45bn), Snap ($18bn), Dominos Pizza ($18bn), Spotify ($14bn), Peloton ($5bn), Lyft ($4bn) and soccer team Manchester United ($4bn). Or, if Buffett wanted to put all of his eggs in one basket, he could go for PayPal ($102bn), Target ($87bn)... or two-and-a-bit Twitters (which seemingly go for $44bn a piece).

Slow and steady wins the race

After years in which high-growth, expensive, companies have been in vogue, Buffett’s unflashy value investing strategy might begin to identify bargains again, as stock markets have slumped so far this year.

Indeed, after 40+ years of outperforming, Berkshire Hathaway is still winning. Over the last 12-months, shares in BRK are up 10%, whilst the S&P 500 is down 14% over the same time period.

More Business

See all Business
business

Jury rules against Musk in lawsuit against OpenAI and Altman

Jurors in Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s lawsuit against Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, and OpenAI found the defendants not liable on all claims on Monday.

In a unanimous verdict reached after less than two hours of deliberation, the Oakland jury found that Musk had waited too long to bring his case forward, exceeding the statute of limitations.

Musk had alleged that OpenAI abandoned its founding mission as a nonprofit dedicated to developing AI for humanity and instead became a profit-driven company closely tied to Microsoft.

The verdict caps off a three-week blockbuster tech trial that could have seen Altman and Brockman removed from OpenAI leadership.

Musk had alleged that OpenAI abandoned its founding mission as a nonprofit dedicated to developing AI for humanity and instead became a profit-driven company closely tied to Microsoft.

The verdict caps off a three-week blockbuster tech trial that could have seen Altman and Brockman removed from OpenAI leadership.

Daily Life In Warsaw

Smartphones are 12% cheaper than last year, according to the latest inflation data... except they’re not

Phones are one of a few important categories that get quality, or “hedonic,” adjustments in the Consumer Price Index — which make their price go down in the official statistics.

business

Texas sues Netflix, accusing streamer of spying on children and collecting user data without consent

The state of Texas filed a lawsuit Monday against streaming giant Netflix, alleging that the company has built a “behavioral-surveillance program of staggering scale.”

The suit alleges that Netflix is “deceptively designed” to be addictive, using features like autoplay to get viewers hooked, “mining those users for data, and then converting that data into lucrative intelligence for global advertising juggernauts.”

“When you watch Netflix, Netflix watches you,” the lawsuit reads.

“This lawsuit lacks merit and is based on inaccurate and distorted information,” Netflix said in a statement to Sherwood News. “Netflix takes our members’ privacy seriously and complies with privacy and data‑protection laws everywhere we operate.”

Texas is seeking civil penalties of “up to $10,000 per violation” of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, along with an additional penalty of up to $250,000 per violation involving a consumer aged 65 or older.

“Netflix is not the ad-free and kid-friendly platform it claims to be. Instead, it has misled consumers while exploiting their private data to make billions,” said Texas Attor­ney Gen­er­al Ken Pax­ton in the press release announcing the lawsuit.

Netflix did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

“This lawsuit lacks merit and is based on inaccurate and distorted information,” Netflix said in a statement to Sherwood News. “Netflix takes our members’ privacy seriously and complies with privacy and data‑protection laws everywhere we operate.”

Texas is seeking civil penalties of “up to $10,000 per violation” of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, along with an additional penalty of up to $250,000 per violation involving a consumer aged 65 or older.

“Netflix is not the ad-free and kid-friendly platform it claims to be. Instead, it has misled consumers while exploiting their private data to make billions,” said Texas Attor­ney Gen­er­al Ken Pax­ton in the press release announcing the lawsuit.

Netflix did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.