Business
Two businessmen fighting for the managing position (holding rudder conflicting with each other)
Getty Images
DUAL CLASS

Co-CEOs are back in Corporate America — and Wall Street isn’t sure what to make of it

Dual leadership has boosted shareholder returns historically, though evidence on operations is thin.

Hyunsoo Rim

Two heads are better than one, right? That’s the thinking of a growing number of corporate boards that have turned to the co-CEO model, with Spotify the latest to join the trend, yesterday appointing Alex Norström and Gustav Söderström as co-chiefs, effective January 2026. That comes hot on the heels of Comcast and Oracle (which sort of has four leaders, rather than two), as both have also announced joint leadership at the top in recent days.

So, what does Wall Street think about having two decision-makers instead of one? It’s hard to reach any concrete conclusions from one day, but if recent market action is anything to go by, the jury’s still out.

Intuitively, the more crowded the helm, the more murky the day-to-day chain of command might be, especially in turbulent times. During the pandemic, SAP ditched its co-CEO structure in just six months for “strong, unambiguous steering.” Back in 2016, Chipotle also reverted to sole leadership as E. coli-driven food safety concerns squeezed its bottom line.

It’s no surprise, therefore, that only a handful of companies are adopting such a structure. A 2022 Harvard Business Review study found that less than 4% of 2,200 firms listed in the S&P 1200 and the Russell 1000 from 1996 to 2020 were led by co-CEOs — though those 86 firms posted an average annual shareholder return of 9.5%, higher than the 6.9% for each firm’s relevant index, with nearly 60% outperforming single-CEO firms.

Of course, having two CEOs doesn’t necessarily guarantee the company runs better. A separate 2011 study found that while co-CEO firms often trade at higher valuations than solo-led peers, there was no clear evidence of stronger operating performance — suggesting, perhaps, that two heads were better at communicating the equity story to Wall Street than one.

So if the evidence is murky, why do it? As noted by Michael Watkins, professor of leadership and organizational change at IMD Business School, modern CEO jobs often exceed “individual bandwidth.” At Netflix, its co-CEOs each oversee different sides of the business — Ted Sarandos on content and marketing, Greg Peters on product and tech — while Oracle’s new duo splits roles between AI infrastructure from industry applications.

More Business

See all Business
Family Watching Baseball On Tv

Netflix and Disney+ probably only added ad-tier subscribers this year, says Morgan Stanley

As streaming prices climb, ad-free subscribers are becoming a rarity.

Aldi Grand Opening

Discount stores are having a moment in America, drawing high- and low-income consumers alike

Everyone loves a deal in 2025 — and Aldi, Walmart, and Dollar Tree are all cashing in.

Millie Giles12/17/25
business

Report: OpenAI won’t pay a dime in cash for its 3-year licensing deal for Disney IP

More financial details behind the landmark deal that will grant OpenAI three years of access to Disney intellectual property are coming out, and they’re pretty surprising.

The deal will reportedly see OpenAI pay zero dollars in licensing fees, instead compensating Disney in stock warrants. It was previously reported that Disney would invest $1 billion into OpenAI as part of the agreement.

It’s very abnormal for Disney to grant anyone access to its massive IP library without a cash payment, and the entertainment juggernaut has been known to strike down even crocheted Etsy Yodas for infringing on its turf. In its fiscal year 2025, Disney booked more than $10 billion in revenue from licensing fees across merchandising, television, and theatrical distribution.

It’s very abnormal for Disney to grant anyone access to its massive IP library without a cash payment, and the entertainment juggernaut has been known to strike down even crocheted Etsy Yodas for infringing on its turf. In its fiscal year 2025, Disney booked more than $10 billion in revenue from licensing fees across merchandising, television, and theatrical distribution.

business

Ford says it will take $19.5 billion in charges in a massive EV write-down

The EV business has marked a long stretch of losing for Ford, and today the automaker announced it will take $19.5 billion in charges tied, for the most part, to its EV division.

Ford said it’s launching a battery energy storage business, leveraging battery plants in Kentucky and Michigan to “provide solutions for energy infrastructure and growing data center demand.”

According to Ford, the changes will drive Ford’s electrified division to profitability by 2029. The company will stop making its electric F-150, the Lightning, and instead shift to an “extended-range electric vehicle” that includes a gas-powered generator.

The Detroit automaker also raised its adjusted earnings before interest and taxes outlook to “about $7 billion” from a range of $6 billion to $6.5 billion.

Ford’s write-down is one of the largest taken by a company as legacy automakers scale back on EVs, giving EV-only automakers a market share boost.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.