Business
Two businessmen fighting for the managing position (holding rudder conflicting with each other)
Getty Images
DUAL CLASS

Co-CEOs are back in Corporate America — and Wall Street isn’t sure what to make of it

Dual leadership has boosted shareholder returns historically, though evidence on operations is thin.

Hyunsoo Rim

Two heads are better than one, right? That’s the thinking of a growing number of corporate boards that have turned to the co-CEO model, with Spotify the latest to join the trend, yesterday appointing Alex Norström and Gustav Söderström as co-chiefs, effective January 2026. That comes hot on the heels of Comcast and Oracle (which sort of has four leaders, rather than two), as both have also announced joint leadership at the top in recent days.

So, what does Wall Street think about having two decision-makers instead of one? It’s hard to reach any concrete conclusions from one day, but if recent market action is anything to go by, the jury’s still out.

Intuitively, the more crowded the helm, the more murky the day-to-day chain of command might be, especially in turbulent times. During the pandemic, SAP ditched its co-CEO structure in just six months for “strong, unambiguous steering.” Back in 2016, Chipotle also reverted to sole leadership as E. coli-driven food safety concerns squeezed its bottom line.

It’s no surprise, therefore, that only a handful of companies are adopting such a structure. A 2022 Harvard Business Review study found that less than 4% of 2,200 firms listed in the S&P 1200 and the Russell 1000 from 1996 to 2020 were led by co-CEOs — though those 86 firms posted an average annual shareholder return of 9.5%, higher than the 6.9% for each firm’s relevant index, with nearly 60% outperforming single-CEO firms.

Of course, having two CEOs doesn’t necessarily guarantee the company runs better. A separate 2011 study found that while co-CEO firms often trade at higher valuations than solo-led peers, there was no clear evidence of stronger operating performance — suggesting, perhaps, that two heads were better at communicating the equity story to Wall Street than one.

So if the evidence is murky, why do it? As noted by Michael Watkins, professor of leadership and organizational change at IMD Business School, modern CEO jobs often exceed “individual bandwidth.” At Netflix, its co-CEOs each oversee different sides of the business — Ted Sarandos on content and marketing, Greg Peters on product and tech — while Oracle’s new duo splits roles between AI infrastructure from industry applications.

More Business

See all Business
Daily Life In Warsaw

Smartphones are 12% cheaper than last year, according to the latest inflation data... except they’re not

Phones are one of a few important categories that get quality, or “hedonic,” adjustments in the Consumer Price Index — which make their price go down in the official statistics.

business

Texas sues Netflix, accusing streamer of spying on children and collecting user data without consent

The state of Texas filed a lawsuit Monday against streaming giant Netflix, alleging that the company has built a “behavioral-surveillance program of staggering scale.”

The suit alleges that Netflix is “deceptively designed” to be addictive, using features like autoplay to get viewers hooked, “mining those users for data, and then converting that data into lucrative intelligence for global advertising juggernauts.”

“When you watch Netflix, Netflix watches you,” the lawsuit reads.

“This lawsuit lacks merit and is based on inaccurate and distorted information,” Netflix said in a statement to Sherwood News. “Netflix takes our members’ privacy seriously and complies with privacy and data‑protection laws everywhere we operate.”

Texas is seeking civil penalties of “up to $10,000 per violation” of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, along with an additional penalty of up to $250,000 per violation involving a consumer aged 65 or older.

“Netflix is not the ad-free and kid-friendly platform it claims to be. Instead, it has misled consumers while exploiting their private data to make billions,” said Texas Attor­ney Gen­er­al Ken Pax­ton in the press release announcing the lawsuit.

Netflix did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

“This lawsuit lacks merit and is based on inaccurate and distorted information,” Netflix said in a statement to Sherwood News. “Netflix takes our members’ privacy seriously and complies with privacy and data‑protection laws everywhere we operate.”

Texas is seeking civil penalties of “up to $10,000 per violation” of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, along with an additional penalty of up to $250,000 per violation involving a consumer aged 65 or older.

“Netflix is not the ad-free and kid-friendly platform it claims to be. Instead, it has misled consumers while exploiting their private data to make billions,” said Texas Attor­ney Gen­er­al Ken Pax­ton in the press release announcing the lawsuit.

Netflix did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.