Business
business

FTC: Pepsi illegally saves its best deals for big-box retailers

The Federal Trade Commission sued PepsiCo on Friday over “price discrimination,” alleging it illegally reserves its best deals for big retailers, squeezing smaller independent stores. 

The move comes in the last week of President Joe Biden’s term. The FTC, led by Lina Khan, has aggressively targeted companies and scored some major wins, like blocking the proposed Kroger-Albertsons merger.

The lawsuit against Pepsi appears be an effort to get consumer-friendly litigation out the door before Khan’s time as head of the FTC is up and a more business-friendly antitrust cop enters the role.

The lawsuit accuses Pepsi of violating the Robinson-Patman Act, a 1930s law that prohibits price favoritism for larger customers over small businesses. According to the FTC, Pepsi has done things like offer promotional payments to big-box retailers but not to independent stores.

“When firms like Pepsi give massive retailers a leg up, it tilts the playing field against small firms and ultimately inflates prices for American consumers,” Khan said in a statement. Pepsi did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Before last month, when the FTC sued beverage distributor Southern Glazer’s over similar allegations, the FTC hadn’t pursued an RPA case since 2000. 

Investors didn’t seem all that rattled by the news, and the stock is up a bit as of noon ET. PepsiCo also announced today that it completed its $1.2 billion acquisition of Siete Foods, a brand that consists of healthy-ish Mexican-inspired foods like tortilla chips and salsas.

The lawsuit against Pepsi appears be an effort to get consumer-friendly litigation out the door before Khan’s time as head of the FTC is up and a more business-friendly antitrust cop enters the role.

The lawsuit accuses Pepsi of violating the Robinson-Patman Act, a 1930s law that prohibits price favoritism for larger customers over small businesses. According to the FTC, Pepsi has done things like offer promotional payments to big-box retailers but not to independent stores.

“When firms like Pepsi give massive retailers a leg up, it tilts the playing field against small firms and ultimately inflates prices for American consumers,” Khan said in a statement. Pepsi did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Before last month, when the FTC sued beverage distributor Southern Glazer’s over similar allegations, the FTC hadn’t pursued an RPA case since 2000. 

Investors didn’t seem all that rattled by the news, and the stock is up a bit as of noon ET. PepsiCo also announced today that it completed its $1.2 billion acquisition of Siete Foods, a brand that consists of healthy-ish Mexican-inspired foods like tortilla chips and salsas.

More Business

See all Business
Daily Life In Warsaw

Smartphones are 12% cheaper than last year, according to the latest inflation data... except they’re not

Phones are one of a few important categories that get quality, or “hedonic,” adjustments in the Consumer Price Index — which make their price go down in the official statistics.

business

Texas sues Netflix, accusing streamer of spying on children and collecting user data without consent

The state of Texas filed a lawsuit Monday against streaming giant Netflix, alleging that the company has built a “behavioral-surveillance program of staggering scale.”

The suit alleges that Netflix is “deceptively designed” to be addictive, using features like autoplay to get viewers hooked, “mining those users for data, and then converting that data into lucrative intelligence for global advertising juggernauts.”

“When you watch Netflix, Netflix watches you,” the lawsuit reads.

“This lawsuit lacks merit and is based on inaccurate and distorted information,” Netflix said in a statement to Sherwood News. “Netflix takes our members’ privacy seriously and complies with privacy and data‑protection laws everywhere we operate.”

Texas is seeking civil penalties of “up to $10,000 per violation” of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, along with an additional penalty of up to $250,000 per violation involving a consumer aged 65 or older.

“Netflix is not the ad-free and kid-friendly platform it claims to be. Instead, it has misled consumers while exploiting their private data to make billions,” said Texas Attor­ney Gen­er­al Ken Pax­ton in the press release announcing the lawsuit.

Netflix did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

“This lawsuit lacks merit and is based on inaccurate and distorted information,” Netflix said in a statement to Sherwood News. “Netflix takes our members’ privacy seriously and complies with privacy and data‑protection laws everywhere we operate.”

Texas is seeking civil penalties of “up to $10,000 per violation” of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, along with an additional penalty of up to $250,000 per violation involving a consumer aged 65 or older.

“Netflix is not the ad-free and kid-friendly platform it claims to be. Instead, it has misled consumers while exploiting their private data to make billions,” said Texas Attor­ney Gen­er­al Ken Pax­ton in the press release announcing the lawsuit.

Netflix did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.