Business
Zuckerberg at a UFC match
Mark Zuckerberg at UFC 300 at T-Mobile Arena on April 13, 2024, in Las Vegas (Jeff Bottari/Getty Images)
Weird Money

Security spending on company CEOs is poised to skyrocket

We’ll probably see a big uptick in companies following Meta’s lead on paying for executive security in 2025.

Jack Raines

The biggest story of December has been the fatal shooting of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. I’m not going to comment on the ongoing investigation, but in the wake of the shooting, The Wall Street Journal published an interesting piece on company spend on executive security outside of work, citing a report from executive-intelligence provider Equilar.

The report says that 27.6% of S&P 500 companies provided security for at least one top executive, up from 23.5% in 2021, and median spending doubled to almost $100,000. (Note: these figures don’t include security spend that occurs in offices or on work travel, as those are considered normal business expenses.) Within that 27.6%, there are some strong outliers.

Meta spent $24.39 million, more than triple the next highest spender, Alphabet, which came in at $6.78 million. UnitedHealthcare, notably, didn’t have any listed costs in 2023. But after that recent shooting, security spend is poised for an uptick:

“Dozens of security chiefs from large U.S. companies met on a call Wednesday to discuss security protocols. One security adviser, Global Guardian CEO Dale Buckner, said he fielded calls from companies looking to send armed guards to accompany executives attending conferences in New York and other U.S. cities this week.”

Given risks posed by the internet, that increase in security spend is probably overdue. The internet has introduced two risk factors for known figures:

  1. It’s much, much easier to find someone’s personal information, such as where they live, what their travel itinerary might be for work events, etc.

  2. Social media is a catalyst for unrest, as it facilitates frictionless communication between individuals with similar gripes.

At any given time, any number of people can be upset about any number of things, including the climate crisis, health insurance, poorly timed layoffs, and politics. Executives of companies deemed to be tied to one of these issues often become targets of this angst, social media allows for the creation of echo chambers of like-minded individuals who share that angst, personal information on these individuals is more accessible than it was pre-internet, and it takes only one person to create a tragedy.

Given that every company in the S&P 500 is worth at least $6 billion, I’m surprised that just ~27% of companies so far have paid for additional security for company executives. I imagine that next quarter’s earnings season will show several companies adding a new line-item expense for “personal security.”

More Business

See all Business
business

Demis Hassabis, Google DeepMind’s CEO and founder, was also an early Anthropic investor

A chess prodigy, and an actual a knight of the realm in the UK, it's perhaps no surprise that Demis Hassabis has made some strategic moves about his exposure to AI upside. According to people familiar with the matter, the influential AI architect became an angel investor in Anthropic, currently behind many of the leading AI models, per Arena AI leaderboards.

The Nobel Prize winner’s position in the Claude creator was previously undisclosed and, according to the Financial Times, highlights Hassabis’ “growing influence across the AI industry.”

Google, which bought DeepMind, the company that Hassabis cofounded and heads to this day, for a reported ~$400 million in 2014, is also a key Anthropic investor. The tech giant reportedly plans to invest up to $40 billion in the AI company as part of the mutually beneficial relationship the pair have forged, with reports that Anthropic has committed to spend $200 billion in the other direction on Google’s cloud services over the next five years.

I'm playing all sides, so I always come out on top

In addition to his financial support for Anthropic, Hassabis has also invested in a range of AI startups launched by colleagues, such as Inflection AI, a company set up by his DeepMind cofounder Mustafa Suleyman (who is now CEO of Microsoft AI), as well as efforts from other collaborators, like David Silver’s Ineffable Intelligence.

Hassabis also emerged as recurring figure on the fringes of the recent Elon Musk v. Sam Altman trial, cropping up repeatedly in testimonies and court documents and appearing to live, as The Verge put it, “rent-free” in Musk’s head.

Founded in 2021, Anthropic has recently raised funding at a reported $900 billion valuation, sending it soaring ahead of competitor OpenAI.

The Nobel Prize winner’s position in the Claude creator was previously undisclosed and, according to the Financial Times, highlights Hassabis’ “growing influence across the AI industry.”

Google, which bought DeepMind, the company that Hassabis cofounded and heads to this day, for a reported ~$400 million in 2014, is also a key Anthropic investor. The tech giant reportedly plans to invest up to $40 billion in the AI company as part of the mutually beneficial relationship the pair have forged, with reports that Anthropic has committed to spend $200 billion in the other direction on Google’s cloud services over the next five years.

I'm playing all sides, so I always come out on top

In addition to his financial support for Anthropic, Hassabis has also invested in a range of AI startups launched by colleagues, such as Inflection AI, a company set up by his DeepMind cofounder Mustafa Suleyman (who is now CEO of Microsoft AI), as well as efforts from other collaborators, like David Silver’s Ineffable Intelligence.

Hassabis also emerged as recurring figure on the fringes of the recent Elon Musk v. Sam Altman trial, cropping up repeatedly in testimonies and court documents and appearing to live, as The Verge put it, “rent-free” in Musk’s head.

Founded in 2021, Anthropic has recently raised funding at a reported $900 billion valuation, sending it soaring ahead of competitor OpenAI.

business

Jury rules against Musk in lawsuit against OpenAI and Altman

Jurors in Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s lawsuit against Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, and OpenAI found the defendants not liable on all claims on Monday.

In a unanimous verdict reached after less than two hours of deliberation, the Oakland jury found that Musk had waited too long to bring his case forward, exceeding the statute of limitations.

Musk had alleged that OpenAI abandoned its founding mission as a nonprofit dedicated to developing AI for humanity and instead became a profit-driven company closely tied to Microsoft.

The verdict caps off a three-week blockbuster tech trial that could have seen Altman and Brockman removed from OpenAI leadership.

Musk had alleged that OpenAI abandoned its founding mission as a nonprofit dedicated to developing AI for humanity and instead became a profit-driven company closely tied to Microsoft.

The verdict caps off a three-week blockbuster tech trial that could have seen Altman and Brockman removed from OpenAI leadership.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.