Business
Delta at the airport
People wait at the Delta counter at JFK International Airport in New York (David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)

The two words in Delta’s profit warning that could have bigger implications

Delta’s decision to slash its forecast may indicate a deeper problem: it’s not just the consumers who are white-knuckling their wallets. It’s the companies.

If you squint at the SEC filing Delta Air Lines put out yesterday afternoon, you’ll find a reason for the slash-and-burn job it did on the quarterly profit forecast that it gave three short months ago. 

“The outlook has been impacted by the recent reduction in consumer and corporate confidence caused by increased macro uncertainty, driving softness in domestic demand,” the company wrote.

That filing sent Delta Air Lines and some of the airline industry — which has already been wounded to the tune of $24 billion in collective market cap lost over the past month — even farther into a spiral.

Delta was down as much as 11.5% in premarket trading, though it managed to rise back to about 2% down just before the opening bell.

But if you read between the lines, this isn’t just about Delta, or even just about airlines. The broader business world should pay attention to two words from that passage in the Delta filing: “corporate confidence.” 

It’s obvious things don’t feel great right now. Markets have been under sustained pressure from several angles — wild uncertainty around tariffs that could reignite inflation, an unwind of bets on riskier assets like tech stocks and cryptocurrencies, and fears that consumers are tightening up and spending more carefully. 

But Delta’s filing indicates a deeper problem: it’s not just the consumers who are white-knuckling their wallets. It’s the companies. 

When an airline says it notices that businesses aren’t as confident — i.e. Corporate America’s suits aren’t booking as many business trips — pay attention. There will be ripple effects. 

If you don’t book that business trip, you don’t book a hotel stay. If you don’t stay at the hotel, you don’t expense a drink at the hotel bar. You don’t book a rental car, pay for gas, or take an Uber to your destination. You don’t go out to dinner with friends in the city where you’re staying, you don’t tip the server, and so on.

Business expenses are a serious revenue engine. The Global Business Travel Association, an industry group that no doubt has some bias, says the US was the nation that spent the most on business travel, with total expenditures of $421.1 billion in 2022, the latest data available. To put that in perspective, that’s more than double the revenue that Amazon, the company with the most revenue in the US, generated last year. The GBTA says business travel also “supported 6 million jobs and represented 3.5% of total employment.” It’s an extreme example, but the Harvard Growth Lab in 2020 estimated that if the US were to cease all business travel, global GDP would drop by 1.1%. 

But a reduction in business travel isn’t the only impact here. The other important thing to remember is that when businesses are clamping down on travel, that means they’re undoubtedly also starting to look for other places to cut.

What happens next? People start getting laid off. Companies’ payrolls have swelled in recent years, so executives will certainly find room to cut. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the number of people employed full time was 3.8% higher in January 2025 than it was in January 2020, just before COVID-19 broke into the US.

Delta’s forecast cut is also interesting because the drop was so steep in such a short time. The company had given its previous forecast on January 10, calling for earnings per share of $0.70 to $1 in the first quarter, with revenue expected to rise 7% to 9%. At the time, Delta’s CFO said, “We have good visibility as we sit here today, as it relates to first quarter, and really the first half of the year. We feel good about that.” Three months later, the situation has starkly changed. The new forecast is for $0.30 to $0.50 of earnings and revenue growth of 3% to 4%. 

It’s a remarkable pivot for an airline, and one that indicates a serious deterioration in what Delta is seeing that we can’t yet.

To be sure, there’s always the chance this moment may wind up being a blip, just a moment for investors to buy the dip. But we’re living in a time when people are credibly worried about rising prices, slowing economic growth, and being laid off all at the same time. If a cutback in business travel is already starting, like Delta says it is, it’s certainly not a good sign.

More Business

See all Business
business

Demis Hassabis, Google DeepMind’s CEO and founder, was also an early Anthropic investor

A chess prodigy and an actual a knight of the realm in the UK, it’s perhaps no surprise that Demis Hassabis has made some strategic moves about his exposure to AI upside. According to people familiar with the matter, the influential AI architect became an angel investor in Anthropic, currently behind many of the leading AI models, per Arena AI leaderboards.

The Nobel Prize winner’s position in the Claude creator was previously undisclosed and, per the Financial Times, highlights Hassabis’ “growing influence across the AI industry.”

Google, which bought DeepMind, the company that Hassabis cofounded and heads to this day, for a reported ~$400 million in 2014, is also a key Anthropic investor. The tech giant reportedly plans to invest up to $40 billion in the AI company as part of the mutually beneficial relationship the pair have forged, with reports that Anthropic has committed to spending $200 billion in the other direction on Google’s cloud services over the next five years.

Im playing all sides, so I always come out on top

In addition to his financial support for Anthropic, Hassabis has also invested in a range of AI startups launched by colleagues, such as Inflection AI, a company set up by DeepMind cofounder Mustafa Suleyman (who is now CEO of Microsoft AI), as well as efforts from other collaborators, like David Silver’s Ineffable Intelligence.

Hassabis also emerged as a recurring figure on the fringes of the recent Elon Musk v. Sam Altman trial, cropping up repeatedly in testimonies and court documents and appearing to live, as The Verge put it, “rent-free” in Musk’s head.

Founded in 2021, Anthropic has recently raised funding at a reported $900 billion valuation, sending it soaring ahead of competitor OpenAI.

The Nobel Prize winner’s position in the Claude creator was previously undisclosed and, per the Financial Times, highlights Hassabis’ “growing influence across the AI industry.”

Google, which bought DeepMind, the company that Hassabis cofounded and heads to this day, for a reported ~$400 million in 2014, is also a key Anthropic investor. The tech giant reportedly plans to invest up to $40 billion in the AI company as part of the mutually beneficial relationship the pair have forged, with reports that Anthropic has committed to spending $200 billion in the other direction on Google’s cloud services over the next five years.

Im playing all sides, so I always come out on top

In addition to his financial support for Anthropic, Hassabis has also invested in a range of AI startups launched by colleagues, such as Inflection AI, a company set up by DeepMind cofounder Mustafa Suleyman (who is now CEO of Microsoft AI), as well as efforts from other collaborators, like David Silver’s Ineffable Intelligence.

Hassabis also emerged as a recurring figure on the fringes of the recent Elon Musk v. Sam Altman trial, cropping up repeatedly in testimonies and court documents and appearing to live, as The Verge put it, “rent-free” in Musk’s head.

Founded in 2021, Anthropic has recently raised funding at a reported $900 billion valuation, sending it soaring ahead of competitor OpenAI.

business

Jury rules against Musk in lawsuit against OpenAI and Altman

Jurors in Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s lawsuit against Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, and OpenAI found the defendants not liable on all claims on Monday.

In a unanimous verdict reached after less than two hours of deliberation, the Oakland jury found that Musk had waited too long to bring his case forward, exceeding the statute of limitations.

Musk had alleged that OpenAI abandoned its founding mission as a nonprofit dedicated to developing AI for humanity and instead became a profit-driven company closely tied to Microsoft.

The verdict caps off a three-week blockbuster tech trial that could have seen Altman and Brockman removed from OpenAI leadership.

Musk had alleged that OpenAI abandoned its founding mission as a nonprofit dedicated to developing AI for humanity and instead became a profit-driven company closely tied to Microsoft.

The verdict caps off a three-week blockbuster tech trial that could have seen Altman and Brockman removed from OpenAI leadership.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.