Business
President Biden Signs Bill Forcing The Sale Of TikTok
The TikTok app is displayed on an iPhone screen (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
TrumpTok

What happens to TikTok under Trump?

Trump’s election victory just *might* bode well for TikTok based on his opinion of “Zuckerschmuck.”

Jack Raines

One of the more interesting stories to watch as Trump prepares to reenter the Oval Office is the fate of TikTok in the United States.

In April, President Biden signed a law that would ban Chinese-owned TikTok unless the app were to be sold within nine months, with the possibility of a three-month extension to find a buyer. As it stands, TikToks deadline is January 19, 2025.

The reason for the ban, which received bipartisan support, is national security. US government officials are concerned that the Chinese government could access user data through the social video app, pointing to laws that allow the Chinese government to demand data from Chinese companies.

The US federal government isnt the first group looking to limit or eliminate TikTok within its jurisdiction, either. India banned the app in 2020, the governments of the UK, Australia, Canada, the EU, France, New Zealand, and 30 US states have banned it from government devices, and the BBC advised staff to remove the app from their corporate phones, too.

Ironically, Biden wasnt the first US president to attempt to ban TikTok. His predecessor (and successor), Donald Trump, attempted to ban TikTok on national-security concerns as well in August 2020, but he was ultimately overruled by a US judge that December.

You would think, given his prior attempt to ban the app, that Trump would gladly embrace this second opportunity to do so. However, Trumps current stance on TikTok isnt that straightforward.

In March, Trump flipped the script and spoke out against banning TikTok, posting on Truth Social, “If you get rid of TikTok, Facebook and Zuckerschmuck will double their business. I don’t want Facebook, who cheated in the last Election, doing better. They are a true Enemy of the People!

While Trumps personal vendetta with Meta and Zuckerberg could have played a role in the reversal of his stance toward TikTok, another factor to watch is his connection to Republican mega-donor Jeff Yass.

Yass, a billionaire financier who founded Susquehanna International Group, has historically been an anti-Trump guy. In June 2023, he donated $10 million to the super PAC arm of Club for Growth, a pro-business, anti-tax organization that was looking for an alternative to Trump for the Republican nomination. Yass also donated $2.5 million directly to a state-level PAC supporting Florida governor Ron DeSantis.

However, in 2024, Yass political calculus began to change. In 2012, Susquehanna invested a few million dollars in ByteDance, the Chinese parent company of TikTok, a stake thats now worth an estimated $40 billion. That stake is now in jeopardy, and he would suffer a multibillion-dollar hit if a TikTok ban, or even forced divestment, were to materialize.

Bidens TikTok ban happened to coincide with Trump retaking the Republican ticket, putting Yass and Trump on a collision course.

A week before Trumps post about TikTok and Facebook, he met with Yass at a Club for Growth donor event in Florida, where Trump referred to Yass as fantastic. Trump later denied discussing TikTok with Yass, but Vanity Fair reported that Yass team had privately been lobbying Trumps team to defend TikTok.

Had Biden been reelected or Harris won, a TikTok ban seemed all but inevitable, even as public support has faded for the ban. However, with Trump poised to return to the White House in January, TikTok might have a chance to stick around. Trumps about-face, whether driven by his vendetta against Meta, his connection to Yass, or some combination of the two, has given the app some breathing room.

More Business

See all Business
Daily Life In Warsaw

Smartphones are 12% cheaper than last year, according to the latest inflation data... except they’re not

Phones are one of a few important categories that get quality, or “hedonic,” adjustments in the Consumer Price Index — which make their price go down in the official statistics.

business

Texas sues Netflix, accusing streamer of spying on children and collecting user data without consent

The state of Texas filed a lawsuit Monday against streaming giant Netflix, alleging that the company has built a “behavioral-surveillance program of staggering scale.”

The suit alleges that Netflix is “deceptively designed” to be addictive, using features like autoplay to get viewers hooked, “mining those users for data, and then converting that data into lucrative intelligence for global advertising juggernauts.”

“When you watch Netflix, Netflix watches you,” the lawsuit reads.

“This lawsuit lacks merit and is based on inaccurate and distorted information,” Netflix said in a statement to Sherwood News. “Netflix takes our members’ privacy seriously and complies with privacy and data‑protection laws everywhere we operate.”

Texas is seeking civil penalties of “up to $10,000 per violation” of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, along with an additional penalty of up to $250,000 per violation involving a consumer aged 65 or older.

“Netflix is not the ad-free and kid-friendly platform it claims to be. Instead, it has misled consumers while exploiting their private data to make billions,” said Texas Attor­ney Gen­er­al Ken Pax­ton in the press release announcing the lawsuit.

Netflix did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

“This lawsuit lacks merit and is based on inaccurate and distorted information,” Netflix said in a statement to Sherwood News. “Netflix takes our members’ privacy seriously and complies with privacy and data‑protection laws everywhere we operate.”

Texas is seeking civil penalties of “up to $10,000 per violation” of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, along with an additional penalty of up to $250,000 per violation involving a consumer aged 65 or older.

“Netflix is not the ad-free and kid-friendly platform it claims to be. Instead, it has misled consumers while exploiting their private data to make billions,” said Texas Attor­ney Gen­er­al Ken Pax­ton in the press release announcing the lawsuit.

Netflix did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.