Culture
vipp trash can
Vipp’s 4L trashcan
Black’s Gold

Can you justify a $335 trashcan? Yes.

Here’s how.

Chris Black

When was the last time you went shopping for a trash can? For me, it was pretty recently, and I decided to splurge on a best-in-class can for my bathroom in New York City: the Vipp Pedal Bin 4L.

Think about it: We use trash cans daily but rarely consider them from a function and design perspective. It’s too easy to hit your local Target and pick whichever one is the least offensive. Maybe you’ve taken it a step further and traveled down a dark road known as “smart trash cans” — bins equipped with sensors and cameras that open lids and compact trash in a classic instance of using technology where it is not needed. If you can’t open a trash can with your foot or hand, you have bigger problems to deal with; yet, as of last year, the smart-trash-can market was valued at $341.5M

The brand Simple Human is the cornerstone of the “luxury market” for trash cans, offering unadorned chrome bins that come in various sizes; some feature “smart” bells and whistles. Simple Human’s products are definitely more stylish than your run-of-the-mill low-cost offerings, but fall into the dreaded “basic plus” category — a phrase I use to describe things that are technically of above-average quality but have become associated with the ALO-wearing Stanley-mug-toting set. You know the type: upwardly mobile, proficient at TikTok, physically fit, and boring. This is a group I cannot afford to be lumped in with, aesthetically or emotionally, even when it comes to waste disposal.

We use trash cans daily but rarely consider them from a function and design perspective.

Luckily for us, in 1939, Holger Nielsen, a metalworker from Denmark, designed the perfect trash receptacle for his wife’s hair salon. He called it the Vipp — “vippe” means “to tilt” in Danish. Folks started begging to buy them, but for many years Nielsen chose to keep them limited to workspaces like police stations and hospitals. Eventually, demand was so strong he began making more, and the can became an iconic piece of form and function, earning itself a permanent place in MoMA’s design collection. Nielsen died in 1992, but Vipp remains a family business, run by his daughter. The company’s wares have expanded to (very expensive) lighting, furniture, and kitchens. 

The stainless-steel bin I bought boasts a signature sound dampener, so the lid shuts quietly; it also raises and lowers at a perfect speed. The lid is also airtight, so smells don’t leak out, and the bottom is made from rubber, so it doesn’t scratch the floor. The sensation on the foot pedal is deeply pleasing, like closing the door on a Porsche 911. The bin comes in several sizes, all featuring its signature domed lid, but only in a few simple colors, because no one needs a trash can with a pop of color. 

Now, the hard part. A one-gallon bin cost me $335, but I can guarantee I will have this little guy forever. A trash can that’s also a piece of art: your bathroom deserves it, and so do you.


Welcome to Black's Gold, a column from Chris Black about the finer things in life. Chris is a writer for New York Magazine's The Strategist, a columnist for GQ, and host of the pop culture podcast 'How Long Gone.'

More Culture

See all Culture
culture
Saleah Blancaflor

Prediction markets give slight edge to Netflix in Warner Bros. battle after eventful week

The ongoing bidding war between Paramount and Netflix for the acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery had some significant news this week that could change the outcome:  

  • Things kicked off Tuesday, when WBD said in a statement it would resume talks with Paramount Skydance to consider its best and final offer after Netflix allowed a seven-day waiver. The WBD board continues to “unanimously recommend” the merger with Netflix, while the streaming service will retain its rights to match or exceed any forthcoming offer from Paramount. The negotiation period ends on February 23.

  • IndieWire reporter Brian Welk talked to a few experts about whether the new developments bring clarity to the ongoing bidding war. One professor said without Paramount offering its “best and final offer,” the company loses credibility, while another professor said it makes Netflix look even more confident. 

  • Lightshed Partners analyst Richard Greenfield said on his podcast that Paramount will have to raise its offer to as high as $36 to $37 per share. (The company has stuck to $30.) In comparison, Netflix’s initial offer is for $27.75 a share to buy the studio and streaming service, while Paramount is bidding to buy the whole company. 

  • Semafor reported Thursday morning that some Democratic senators are “unhappy” with the fact that Paramount Skydance CEO David Ellison refused to attend a hearing two weeks ago, and could launch an investigation into the deal if they retake the Senate.

  • Meanwhile, Reuters reported that Netflix has “ample cash” and could increase its offer for WBD if Paramount beefs up its own offer, according to sources. 

  • Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos recently appeared on a recent episode of “The Town with Matthew Belloni” to reiterate that he doesn’t plan on ruining WBD’s theatrical business model and promised to keep the 45-day theatrical window for WBD films, which could appease opposition from theater owners.

  • Variety reported that there’s been a shift among WBD employees who now support Netflix’s acquisition, though there’s still some skepticism among others.

WBD shareholders are still set to vote on the proposed Netflix merger next month, on March 20. Despite the renewed talks with Parmount, as of Friday at 12:45 p.m. ET, prediction markets speculating on who will ultimately come out on top have recently flipped to give the edge back to Netflix, pricing in a 46% chance over Paramount’s 44% odds. 

(Event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC — probabilities referenced or sourced from KalshiEx LLC or ForecastEx LLC.)

Loading...
 
Loading...
 

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.