Markets
US Presidential Debate
Yes, again. (Getty Images)

Markets are now watching the election

Here are a few areas where politics could moves prices.

We’ve put it off for as long as possible.

But the first Biden-Trump debate on Thursday could mark the moment when this year’s race for the White House will start to weigh on financial markets — not to mention the national psyche.

The influence of politics on markets will likely grow over the next six months, ahead of the November 5 vote. But analysts are already sketching out how they think markets will react to various electoral scenarios.

Such analyses are largely guesswork. No one can really say precisely why markets move, especially so-called “macro” markets like currencies and government bonds, which are influenced by a lot more than elections.

Still, these notes can offer helpful shortcuts, areas to watch for, and hints about how investors may be handicapping the race. Here’s a smattering of what we’ve read, arranged thematically.

The dollar

For now, Wall Street is zeroing in on Donald Trump’s concrete calls for new trade barriers as the most important issue for investors.

While the Biden administration has maintained some Trump-era tariffs and even imposed new ones on Chinese goods in recent weeks, the former president has called for much wider use of trade barriers, including a 10% across-the-board tariff on all imports, as well as a 60% (or higher!) tariff on all Chinese imports.

With Trump, it’s hard to say if this is a real proposal or bluster. But analysts are in broad agreement that a second Trump administration would make liberal use of trade barriers, setting the stage for a rerun of the noisy trade wars of the first term. Trade War 2.0 could whipsaw trade sensitive corners of the stock market, weaken the currencies of trading partners, and drive up the relative value of the dollar, Wall Street analysts say.

“We still see a stronger US dollar as the most reliable impact of a potential Republican victory because a stronger US dollar is the most consistent response to tariff risks,” Goldman analysts wrote in note last month.

Analysts at Morgan Stanley concur, writing in an election preview recently: “history suggests tariff talk resulting from a Republican White House win could boost the currency.”

Takeaway: Growing dollar strength as we approach the election could suggest global investors see a Trump win as likely.

Globally exposed US companies

In this Trade War 2.0 scenario, stock prices of companies who sell a large share of their products overseas may underperform — unless, like semiconductor producers, they’re benefitting from a secular theme strong enough to overcome these headwinds.

For one thing, a strong dollar lowers the value of revenues earned in other currencies. (In other words, the money an American company makes selling products in Britain or France, for example, turns into fewer dollars when those pounds and euros are converted back into greenbacks.)

On the other hand, share prices of American producers focused on the US market could rise. They could benefit from a re-shoring trend, or gain market share as tariffs make foreign-made products too expensive for American buyers.

Analysts at French investment bank Société Générale suggested that betting on a basket of stocks likely to benefit from such re-shoring could be a good way to take advantage of a Republican victory.

“Based on the policies likely to be adopted under Trump, we believe the index could outperform by more than 3x under a Trump presidency,” they wrote in a note earlier this year.

Takeaway: Slumping shares of big exporters, like Boeing for instance, as November 5 nears could mean investors are betting on a second Trump administration.

The safe bet? Volatility

While Wall Street analysts are loath to take a position on how the coming election will shake out, more than a few think a pretty safe bet is that the markets will get jumpier as we approach November 5.

“In the past 50 years, S&P 500 realized volatility was ~2 points higher in a US election year than in non-election year,” JP Morgan analysts wrote in a recent note. “While is still more than 6 months out, options markets are pricing in a material risk premium around the US elections in November.”

A separate Bank of America report spotlighted a 25% rise in volatility from July to November of election years, noting “the market has yet to price in a potential rise in political uncertainty.”

Takeaway: Buckle up.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Opendoor surges on bullish options bets as traders look to potential real estate tokenization

Opendoor Technologies is surging on Friday amid bullish options bets and social media posts referencing unconfirmed rumors about the company.

The stock moved higher in the premarket session after the soft inflation report boosted stocks and briefly pushed long-term bond yields lower (positive for a real estate company). But the real gains came after the opening bell rang and options demand picked up.

As of 12:11 p.m. ET, roughly 664,000 call options have changed hands versus a 10-day average of about 364,000 for a full session.

What seems to be galvanizing members of the “$OPEN Army” is the potential for the company to pursue the tokenization of real-world assets, with Robinhood often bandied about as a potential partner in this endeavor.

(Robinhood Markets Inc. is the parent company of Sherwood Media, an independently operated media company subject to certain legal and regulatory restrictions.)

Opendoor bulls have often pointed to signs that Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev appears to be fond of the company, from what appeared on-screen during a demo of a social trading feature at HOOD’s conference in Las Vegas in September to offering support to Opendoor CEO Kaz Nejatian in setting up an opportunity for retail shareholders to ask questions during the online real estate company’s next earnings call.

Opendoor is currently in a quiet period ahead of earnings, which restricts what type of announcements a company can make.

The call options seeing the most demand expire this Friday with strike prices of $8, $8.50, and $9.

Intel Earnings Researchers

Wall Street analysts see some issues with Intel’s earnings

Even with the US government as a partial owner, Intel’s turnaround has a long way to go.

markets

Beyond Meat gains amid slightly better-than-expected Q3 sales, positive commentary on legal issues

Shares of Beyond Meat built on their premarket gains after the plant-based meat seller reported preliminary Q3 sales a bit ahead of Wall Street’s expectations, before paring this advance after the market opened.

For the three months ended September 27, management said net revenue would be approximately $70 million. That’s in line with their guidance range of $68 million to $73 million, but Wall Street was expecting sales to skew toward the lower end of that range, at $68.7 million.

However, its anticipated gross margin of 10% to 11% is lower than analysts had been expecting (13.8%). That’s still the case even adjusting for expenses related to its downsizing of operations in China, which would have left margins around 12% to 13%, per Beyond.

Perhaps more importantly, the company provided positive commentary regarding arbitration discussions with a former co-manufacturer that appear to bring it closer to a resolution while limiting potential damages:

“As previously disclosed, in March 2024, a former co-manufacturer brought an action against the Company in a confidential arbitration proceeding claiming that the Company inappropriately terminated its agreement with the co-manufacturer and claimed damages of at least $73.0 million. On September 15, 2025, the arbitrator issued an interim award (the ‘Interim Award’) and found that the Company had a valid basis to terminate the agreement with the Manufacturer. The details of the Interim Award are confidential, and a final arbitration award has not been issued. Additional proceedings will be held to determine the award of attorneys’ fees, prejudgment interest and costs, if any, before a final arbitration award will be issued. On September 25, 2025, the Manufacturer filed a request with the arbitrator to re-open the arbitration hearing. On September 29, 2025, the Company opposed this request. On October 20, 2025, the arbitrator denied the Manufacturer’s request.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.