Markets
Hammock
The Citi economic surprise index tends to look like this. (Getty Images)
Summer blues

Surprise! This is the gloomiest you’re likely to be about the economy this year

Look out for the “hammock pattern.”

Luke Kawa

Statistically speaking, now — the start of summer — is the winter of our economic discontent.

The Citi US economic surprise index measures how much data released over the past three months has exceeded or fallen short of economists’ expectations. From 2011 through 2019, this index displayed some interesting seasonal tendencies. On average, this series usually starts off well before fading strongly into mid year, bottoms on June 28th, and then rises into year-end.

About a decade ago, The Globe and Mail’s Scott Barlow, a veteran mutual fund analyst and journalist, dubbed this “the hammock pattern” for, well, obvious reasons.

A trend of early-year over-optimism has also been present in key market and economic variables. From 2011 through 2019, earnings per share estimates for S&P 500 companies as well as the expected rate of US GDP growth for a given calendar year have tended to be revised lower as time passed.

Economic surprise indexes are a little different in that they typically mean-revert back towards zero. The logic underpinning this: If analysts make consistent forecasting errors in the same direction, enough one-way failures spur a re-calibration and over-correction in the opposite direction.

If there’s a fundamental cause behind the twists and turns of this particular pattern, it may rest in gas prices, which are usually inversely correlated with economic surprise indexes and also often top in the summer months (the peak driving season).

The pandemic disrupted economic activity significantly — causing abrupt changes in the economy linked to the timing of shutdowns, stimulus, and re-opening that spurred outlier moves in prices, spending, and employment that didn’t really conform to seasonal norms.  In addition, the rate of nominal growth (real activity plus inflation) has been much higher and more volatile over the past four years. As such, the hammock pattern hasn’t been as seemingly reliable as it was pre-pandemic. 

But so far this year, the index is displaying some of its old seasonal behavior. Well, at least the bad part. Recently, the US economic surprise index slumped to -29, its lowest level since mid-2022.

This perceived loss of growth momentum has been accompanied by an actual moderation in activity. Separately, there’s been softness in Citi’s US economic data change index, which tracks how well or poorly the data are relative to their one-year average, and has declined to its lowest level of the year.

Some stabilization or improvement in either investors’ perception of the economic data – or the data itself – may be needed to shift the dominant meta in the stock market, which in 2024 has been defined by the outperformance of megacaps (especially in the tech space, and Nvidia in particular) relative to the many other stocks that comprise the S&P 500.

22V Research chief market strategist and founder Dennis DeBusschere is calling for stock-market strength in some of the areas that have lagged behind, like banks, transportation (ex-airlines), energy, and real estate investment trusts.

He laid out the case for investors’ confidence in the durability of the US expansion to improve in the weeks ahead, making two points in a note to clients this week.

“First, the odds that both the US economic diffusion index and the Citi surprise index move significantly lower from here, are low (they have already registered sharp declines),” he wrote. “Second, some moderation in economic growth, which is happening now, will be taken as benign by investors (unless there are sharp downside surprises).”

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Stock futures slide on Trump's 25% European tariff threat over Greenland, as gold and silver push higher

With US exchanges closed for MLK Day, European and Asian stock markets have been the main release valve for reaction to President Trump’s fresh tariff threats to Europe, which followed sharp pushback from European allies around America’s ongoing Greenland pursuit.

In a Truth Social post on Saturday, Trump warned that the US would impose tariffs on several European countries — Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands, and Finland — unless a deal is reached for the “Complete and Total purchase of Greenland.” A 10% tariffs on “any and all goods” shipped to the US from the eight countries would take effect February 1, rising to 25% by the start of June if an agreement isn’t reached.

European stock markets opened lower, with the broad STOXX Europe 600 down 1.2%. France's CAC 40 index, Germany's DAX, and the UK's FTSE 100 fell 1.5%, 1.3%, and 0.5%, respectively, as of 5:12 a.m. ET. Asian markets also closed lower on global trade fears, with Tokyo's Nikkei 225 down 0.6%.

Although liquidity is thin, US risk assets weren’t entirely shielded, with S&P 500 Futures (Mar ‘26 E-Mini contract) down a little over 1% as of 5:45 a.m. ET. Bitcoin also dropped sharply, down ~2.5% from its undisturbed price.

Meanwhile, precious metals (again) hit all-time highs, with spot gold up more than 2% to a record $4,690 per ounce and silver hitting a record $94.08 per ounce, extending its rally this year.

TACO vs. TART?

A popular market narrative over the last year has been that President Trump often employs tariffs as threat, using them as a bargaining tool for other goals. But the “Trump Always Chickens Out” argument isn’t really borne out by the data. As Luke Kawa pointed out last year, the reality is that the US has raised its levies rate on both occasions that Trump has been in the White House, suggesting that the more accurate acronym is really: “Trump Always Raises Tariffs.” For now, this latest reactive threat to America’s allies looks more like a bargaining tool than a high-priority bit of trade policy.

markets

Nvidia’s H200 suppliers reportedly pause production after China blocks imports

The saga of Nvidia’s H200s has more confounding twists and turns than a house of mirrors.

On Friday evening, the Financial Times reported that suppliers for Nvidia’s H200 chips have halted production amid reports that Beijing has banned these processors from entering the country. Bloomberg had previously reported that China would begin to allow H200 imports for commercial use “as soon as this quarter.”

Nvidia called upon suppliers to boost output of components for these H200 chips after reportedly receiving more than 2 million orders from Chinese customers while only having roughly 700,000 in inventory.

Chinese policymakers have been keen on boosting their domestic semiconductor industry, with Nvidia’s H20 chips (a nerfed version of the H200) not breaking through into the market in a meaningful way even after export restrictions were lifted last year. Even though the H200 is considerably more powerful than the H20, recent reporting by both the FT and The Information suggests that regulators are similarly intent on limiting access.

That’s creating a more robust black market for Nvidia’s flagship Blackwell chips, per the FT:

One Chinese seller of Nvidia AI servers said many local customers had cancelled orders for the H200. Instead, they have switched to the more advanced B200 and B300, which are banned for export into China by Washington, leading to an active black market for the chips.

The Department of Commerce had recently revised its export review policy to lay the foundation for Nvidia to begin to ship these chips to the world’s second-largest economy, while US President Donald Trump imposed a 25% levy on H200 imports into the US that will not be used domestically (that is, will be brought in then re-exported to China). These announcements also cover AMD’s MI325X chips.

markets
Luke Kawa

How Claude Code “is the ChatGPT moment repeated” — and why that’s awful news for software stocks

The relentless slide in software stocks continues, with the iShares Expanded Tech Software ETF trading to the downside and lagging the market on Friday.

The growing adoption of Claude Code, and more recently, the launch of Claude Cowork by Anthropic, has been an attention-grabbing moment as to the power of AI agents and how they can be housed and operated solely under one highly integrated user interface.

To say that software stocks have fallen out of favor would be an understatement, as having this much industry-specific market pain is incredibly rare. Based on data going back to 2001, if IGV has fallen at least 5% over the past month, the SPDR S&P 500 ETF is typically also down between 5% to 6% over the same period. Less than 3% of the time does SPY rise at least 1% while software stocks have gotten slammed — 28 instances in total, going back to August 2001 — and three of those are the past three sessions. Their valuation compression has also been intense.

Doug O’Laughlin, president of SemiAnalysis, authored a thought-provoking piece on just how momentous this recent technological progress is, along with his views on how AI agents will displace software and what disrupted companies can do adapt. A couple excerpts:

Assuming it improves, has harnesses, and can continue to scale large context windows and only become marginally more intelligent, I believe this is enough to really take us to the next state of AI. I cannot stress enough that Claude Code is the ChatGPT moment repeated. You must try it to understand.

One day, the successor to Claude Code will make a superhuman interface available to everyone. And if Tokens were TCP/IP, Claude Code is the first genuine website built in the age of AI. And this is going to hurt a large part of the software industry.

I believe that all software must leave information work as soon as possible. I believe that the future role of software will not have much information processing’, i.e., analysis. Claude Code or Agent-Next will be doing the information synthesis, the GUI, and the workflow. That will be ephemeral and generated for the use at hand. Anyone should be able to access the information they want in the format they want and reference the underlying data.

What I’m trying to say is that the traditional differentiation metrics will change. Faster workflows, better UIs, and smoother integrations will all become worthless, while persistent information, a la an API, will become extremely valuable.

The growing adoption of Claude Code, and more recently, the launch of Claude Cowork by Anthropic, has been an attention-grabbing moment as to the power of AI agents and how they can be housed and operated solely under one highly integrated user interface.

To say that software stocks have fallen out of favor would be an understatement, as having this much industry-specific market pain is incredibly rare. Based on data going back to 2001, if IGV has fallen at least 5% over the past month, the SPDR S&P 500 ETF is typically also down between 5% to 6% over the same period. Less than 3% of the time does SPY rise at least 1% while software stocks have gotten slammed — 28 instances in total, going back to August 2001 — and three of those are the past three sessions. Their valuation compression has also been intense.

Doug O’Laughlin, president of SemiAnalysis, authored a thought-provoking piece on just how momentous this recent technological progress is, along with his views on how AI agents will displace software and what disrupted companies can do adapt. A couple excerpts:

Assuming it improves, has harnesses, and can continue to scale large context windows and only become marginally more intelligent, I believe this is enough to really take us to the next state of AI. I cannot stress enough that Claude Code is the ChatGPT moment repeated. You must try it to understand.

One day, the successor to Claude Code will make a superhuman interface available to everyone. And if Tokens were TCP/IP, Claude Code is the first genuine website built in the age of AI. And this is going to hurt a large part of the software industry.

I believe that all software must leave information work as soon as possible. I believe that the future role of software will not have much information processing’, i.e., analysis. Claude Code or Agent-Next will be doing the information synthesis, the GUI, and the workflow. That will be ephemeral and generated for the use at hand. Anyone should be able to access the information they want in the format they want and reference the underlying data.

What I’m trying to say is that the traditional differentiation metrics will change. Faster workflows, better UIs, and smoother integrations will all become worthless, while persistent information, a la an API, will become extremely valuable.

markets
Luke Kawa

Strategists sound alarm over silver’s rally, recommend options trades for potential violent reversal

Silver’s ridiculous romp higher in 2025 and at the start of this year is showing some signs of fraying around the edges.

And with just how fierce the move higher has been, strategists are warning of the potential for intense downside as some of the key parts of the fundamental and technical theses for silver are starting to look less solid.

Michael Purves, CEO of Tallbacken Capital Advisors, who’s been bullish on the shiny metal, thinks it’s once again time to hedge long exposure.

On Thursday, he recommended selling $95 strike calls on the iShares Silver Trust that expire in February to purchase $75 strike puts.

Purves previously recommended that clients hedge their silver exposure on December 26 (its 2025 peak) before declaring that the coast was once again clear for longs on December 30.

“It might be surprising to know that speculative long silver futures positions are at 20 month lows, or that Open Interest is at five year lows,” he wrote. “Once again, hedging long positions is in order — particularly given the distorted put-call skew which allows [investors] to sell calls to finance long put positions.”

Viresh Kanabar, an investment strategist at Macro Hive, followed this up on Friday by flagging one of several key changes in the market structure for silver. The physical market tightness, cited by bulls as an important driver behind silver’s skyward ascent, is showing signs of reversing.

“1m forwards on physical silver have flipped back to contango,” he wrote. “This lines up with physical ETF outflows and evidence that high prices are weighing on industrial demand.”

Silver contango

“In short, we are not bullish on silver at these levels, instead, see increasing signs of risks skewing to the downside,” Kanabar added.

David Cervantes, founder of Pinebrook Capital Management, told clients on Thursday that he’s taken a short position in silver by owning put options on SLV with three months to expiry, noting that its outperformance of the stock market over the past 100 and 252 days has reached unprecedented levels.

“THIS IS HIGHLY SPECULATIVE AND A SMALL GAMBLE-SIZED WAGER WILL BE MADE OVER WHICH SLEEP WILL NOT BE LOST,” he emphasized.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.