Markets
Rear view of mature woman in city carrying shopping bags crossing pedestrian crossing looking sideways, Shibuya, Tokyo, Japan
Getty Images

Cheap handbags bring all the tourists to Japan. But there's a dark side for luxury brands.

It feels like a year where every influencer and their mother has made a trip to Japan.

There’s no shortage of good reasons: Tokyo not only has the most Michelin-starred restaurants, it is also home to a four-billion dollar luxury vintage market. And thanks to the weak Japanese yen, the prices of high-end fashion items at luxury boutiques are pretty attractive.

Ashley Bell, who lives in New York, was amazed when she visited Tokyo in January. 

“There were luxury resale shops that — depending on the neighborhood — could be like every other corner, and they were filled with Birkin bags, Kelly bags, huge walls of Chanel,” she said. 

In boutique stores that sell new luxury goods, she noticed that prices were about 10 to 20% cheaper than retail tags in the US. For an Hermès bag that would have cost over $4,000 at home, she paid $3,100 in Japan with the lower prices and exchange rates. 

The Japanese yen hit its lowest level since the 1990s earlier this year. That led tourists to flock to Japan and take advantage of the cheaper prices there, especially on premium brands. In June, the country estimated that it hosted over three million international travelers, a 51.2% increase compared to a year ago, an all-time high that surpassed pre-pandemic levels.

The pricing dilemma

When foreign shoppers rush into luxury boutiques, it may actually crowd out local customers from shopping and leave them with a sour taste in their mouths.

“At the end of the day, it’s about looking at your own backyard, where you have these local customers who are loyal to you, the ones that will always be here and they are not going anywhere,” said Scott Kerr, the founder of luxury branding firm Silvertone Consulting. “If they feel less wanted, they might not go shopping at your brand.” 

How to balance local demand and the influx of tourism has become a challenge for luxury brands, especially when it comes to the industry’s favorite strategic maneuver at times of declining sales momentum: price hikes.

LVMH, for one, said that they implemented "numerous price increases" over the last few quarters, even as sales declined in each of the first two quarters of 2024. And Kering made comments about "introducing new products that are more expensive" at Gucci while sales dropped 19% in the second quarter.

It’s no secret that brands tend to raise prices in order to grow revenue. According to HSBC, the average prices of the most iconic handbags in Europe has risen a whopping 52% since 2019, and analysts called it a “main driver of sales growth between 2021 and 2023.”

That’s happening in Japan, too: Bell, the shopper from New York, in January saw a sign outside of an Hermès boutique that warned customers about price increases across the board starting the following month.

But if the brands raise prices when the yen is weak in order to take advantage of tourists’ spending, local customers would end up with a case of sticker shock.

“The magnitude and velocity of the yen weakness make it difficult to offset the impact through price increases,” LVMH’s Guinoy said. “We are reluctant to unduly penalize local demand in Japan. This means a significant portion of the growth is currently taking place at the lower price index.”

If recent trends in the foreign exchange market continue, however, this less than ideal state of affairs for brands (and the boon for traveling consumers) may be on the way out. The Japanese yen has posted sharp gains versus the US dollar and Chinese yuan since early January as investors ready themselves for a rate-cutting cycle from the Federal Reserve.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Lucid continues its autumn rout, hitting a fresh all-time low following a price target cut by Stifel

It’s been a rough 48 days for luxury EV maker Lucid, which fell to a fresh all-time low on Monday following a price target cut by analysts at Stifel.

Stifel lowered its Lucid price target to $17, from $21, with analyst Stephen Gengaro writing that the company will likely require additional capital over the next few years. According to Stifel’s note, published Monday, Lucid’s production is improving but it’s still in the “prove-it-to-me” stage, and vehicles that could elevate sales volumes are “likely two years away.”

Last week, Lucid announced that it plans to raise $875 million through a private offering of convertible senior notes due in 2031. The company lowered its production outlook and reported negative free cash flow of $955 million in its third quarter.

Since the end of the EV tax credit on September 30 — which Lucid’s pricey vehicles only qualified for through leasing loopholes — its shares are down more than 40%. Zooming out, Lucid’s stock has shed 98% of its value from its 2021 highs amid peak electric vehicle optimism.

Dell Double Downgrade

Dell dives on double downgrade from Morgan Stanley

JPMorgan analysts, on the other hand, have a much different view.

markets

Peter Thiel’s hedge fund cut its stake in Tesla by 76%

Peter Thiel’s hedge fund, Thiel Macro, has cut its stake in Elon Musk’s Tesla by 76%, according to new filings. At the end of Q3, it held 65,000 shares of the stock, down from 272,613 at the end of Q2. Thiel and Musk are longtime friends who famously cofounded PayPal together and are part of the so-called PayPal Mafia.

The filing also showed that Thiel Macro exited its entire position in Nvidia. The fund’s top holdings are now Apple, Microsoft, and Tesla, valued at roughly $20 million, $25 million, and $29 million, respectively.

“Hang on to your Tesla stock,” Musk recently told investors at the company’s annual shareholder meeting, where they approved his $1 trillion pay package. Thiel, or at least the fund bearing his name, apparently didn’t listen.

markets

Amazon launches $12 billion bond sale as AI boom fuels need for capital

That giant sucking sound you hear is the AI boom continuing to pull in capital.

Per Bloomberg, Amazon is launching a six-part bond sale, its first new issue since November 2022.

The firm is aiming to raise $12 billion with a series of maturities ranging from three to 40 years.

Per Bloomberg sources familiar with the matter, the offering is for “general corporate purposes,” but in today’s day and age, that’s basically tantamount to financing ambitious AI investments.

The likes of Meta, Oracle, and Alphabet have recently tapped the market or announced plans to do so. Credit risk modestly starting to creep into the AI trade as issuance explodes has been a contributor to the sharp pullback in speculative stocks, many of which are highly levered to that theme.

“Even boasting some of the strongest balance sheets and highest ratings among corporate issuers, software and services providers’ increased spending and borrowing have widened their bond spreads, with some facing downgrades,” Bloomberg Intelligence analysts Robert Schiffman and Alex Reid wrote. “Though spreads are wider, the risk of significant widening, for most, appears contained.”

In their view, Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet, and Meta are best positioned, while the picture is less positive for Oracle.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.