Markets
Stock market performance trump tariffs
(NOAA/Getty Images)

Morningstar Research strategist: “We’re in the eye of the hurricane”

David Sekera, Morningstar Research Service’s chief US market strategist, thinks we’ve only just seen the initial impact of the Trump administration’s tariff storm. Batten down the hatches.

It’s easy for stock investors to feel a bit at sea at the moment.

After plunging 11% to start April, the S&P 500 bounced hard, recently enjoying a run of nine consecutive daily gains that — at least briefly — helped the blue chips reclaim all the ground lost since President Trump declared the start of the tariff war on April 2.

But where to from here?

With stocks sputtering a bit over the last couple days, we thought it would be worthwhile to speak with David Sekera, chief US market strategist for Morningstar Research, the venerable Chicago-based stock and mutual fund research outfit.

Sekera and the firm take a bottom-up approach to the markets, with Morningstar’s Equity Research Group covering 1,600 global shares using a value-investing approach that emphasizes accurately estimating a company’s earnings power and “intrinsic value” and then determining whether the price the stock is trading at is cheap (and therefore attractive), expensive, or more or less at fair value.

Here are some highlights from our interview on Monday, edited for concision and clarity.

Sherwood News: Where are we in the stock market right now? I’ve lost my grip on where we are in this story that started with the market sell-off in February, worsened with the tariffs, and then has sort of snapped back.

David Sekera: To me, it kind of feels like we’re in the eye of the hurricane. I think the earliest signs of the impending storm started earlier this year. In February and March, we had the bear market in the artificial intelligence stocks.

Then the hurricane made landfall when Trump announced the Liberation Day tariffs on April 2 and stocks of course quickly plunged, falling as far as 20% down from the highs.

So they implemented the pause and the stock market started to move back up. The focus shifted to earnings season, which I’d say generally has been relatively benign. Here, at the beginning of May, it seems like we’re in a period of relative calm. That’s why I think it feels like we are in the eye of the hurricane.

Sherwood: What’s next?

Sekera: The trade agreements still need to be completed. If my math is right, that 90-day pause will last until July 8. I suspect we won’t have new trade agreements completed until we start really getting closer to that deadline.

We did see a pretty good amount of pull forward as far as people buying as much inventory and supplies as they could before the tariffs are supposed to go into effect. But I think we will see some supply and transportation dislocation. That will result in a number of disruptions and probably earnings distortions this next quarter.

Sherwood: Dislocations? Could you drill down a little bit on that? What are you envisioning when you say that? Do you mean empty shelves or are you talking more in terms of economic data, higher inflation, lower growth, things like that?

Sekera: We are looking for the rate of economic growth to slow sequentially each quarter for the remainder of this year. Our base case is still no recession, but we are looking for that sequential slowdown.

Sherwood: And what’s the implication for the market there?

Sekera: Not only do we have to wait for the trade agreements to still get negotiated, but we’ve still got supply and transportation dislocations, disruptions, and earnings distortions coming up, and the economy is slowing. Also, I suspect the Fed is going to be on hold for now.

If we’re correct and the stock market suffers another sell-off, I’d recommend keeping enough dry powder to move back to an overweight position once valuations warrant.

Sherwood: Do you have certain sectors or parts of the market you would recommend moving into?

Sekera: We did recommend overweighting value stocks, as they are trading at the greatest discount to fair value right now, as opposed to growth stocks, which is what we recommend as underweight because they’re still trading at a 3% premium.

Sherwood: And by growth stocks, you’re talking about Russell 1000-growth-style companies — fast annual earnings growth, high price-to-earnings ratios?

Sekera: Yes, similar to that.

Sherwood: So much of the leadership of the S&P 500 has been derived from the Magnificent 7 over the last couple of years: Nvidia, Tesla, etc. Where does that factor into all of your thinking?

Sekera: At the beginning of the year, technology was a bit overvalued because those AI stocks were generally overvalued, but now that we’ve had the bear market in AI stocks, those are down 20% or more pretty much across the board. The technology sector is now looking pretty attractive, trading at a 9% discount to fair value. So it’s not the most undervalued sector, but it’s certainly much more attractive at this point.

Interestingly, the most undervalued sector right now is communication services. It’s heavily skewed by large-capitalization stocks, because you’ve got Alphabet and you’ve got Meta in that sector, both of those being very undervalued.

But having said that, there are also a lot of more traditional communications and media names in there. Verizon is one that we’ve been highlighting as being very undervalued. We have been recommending AT&T and Verizon for several years now. I still see upside potential in Verizon, and it’s also another one that pays a very attractive dividend where you can get paid to wait.

We also think small-cap stocks [iShares Russell 2000 ETF] are very undervalued here. I think it might take at least a couple quarters before small-cap starts start to work, but that would be an area that I’d look to rally very quickly.

Sherwood: All right, David. Thanks very much for your time. It’s been great to speak with you.

Sekera: Anytime. Have a great rest of your day.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Marvell and Flex rise on S&P 500 inclusion announcement

Chipmaker Marvell Technology and electronics manufacturer Flex are jumping 7% and 3%, respectively, in premarket trading on Monday, after S&P Dow Jones Indices announced late on Friday that the two companies are set to join the S&P 500 benchmark index.

Replacing Pool Corp and Campbell’s in the S&P 500, Marvell and Flex’s addition will be effective from June 22, per a press release from the provider, which assesses and updates the index on a quarterly basis.

Marvell has been one of the leading candidates for inclusion across the last few quarterly index rebalances. The company has ballooned into a $230 billion chip giant of late, thanks to the wider AI boom, investors chasing momentum, and, yes, Jensen Huang. Flex, which has been part of the S&P MidCap 400 index since 2024, has also grown recently, having played a part in the data center boom with its portfolio spanning across infrastructure and cooling systems.

With today’s premarket movement taken into account, MRVL has now risen almost 40% in the last week alone.

Dickens, Great Expectations, He said, Aha! would you?

Tech tumbles as momentum stocks run into a blowout jobs report and a wave of profit-taking

The AI trade is under some pressure, taking prices back like... a few days. President Donald Trump is not a fan of the price action.

Trump Administration Considers Reclassifying Marijuana As A Less Dangerous Drug

Trulieve to list on NYSE, a first for US cannabis sector

More may be on the way: several other US cannabis companies have announced reverse stock splits with the intention of listing on a major exchange.

markets

Lululemon’s stretch getting tested: Stock plunges after after outlook is cut

Lululemon shares are down double digits in premarket trading after the company cut its full-year sales and profit outlook, overshadowing a Q1 beat and raising fresh concerns about the brand’s turnaround efforts.

The company now expects fiscal 2026 revenue to be flat to down 1%, compared with its prior forecast for 2% to 4% growth. Guidance for full-year diluted earnings per share was dragged down to a range of $10.95 to $11.15, below the company’s previous guidance of $12.10 to $12.30 and well below Wall Street’s estimate of $13.26.

Key numbers for Q1:

  • EPS of $1.69 vs. the $1.68 expected.

  • Revenue of $2.47 billion vs. the $2.43 billion expected.

The modest top-line beat masked a widening divergence between Lululemons geographic markets. While international revenue rose 22% overall with a 30% increase in Mainland China, the bigger problem remains North America, where revenue fell 5%.

Interim co-CEO and CFO Meghan Frank acknowledged during the earnings call that recent product rollouts underperformed. A highly anticipated yoga campaign failed to generate its expected halo effect across broader product lines.

Profitability metrics took a major hit, with gross margins contracting by 410 basis points to 54.2% due to mounting tariff costs and promotional markdowns. Operating income consequently fell 37% year over year to $276.9 million.

“We experienced spikes of negative commentary in the media and on social channels with regard to our brand, which had an impact on traffic and overall top-line performance,” Frank said during the earnings call. “And second, not all of our product launches have met our expectations. While we have had several successful launches so far this year, we have seen others as we start Q2 not generate the anticipated guest response.”

Lululemons valuation has already been steadily compressing for years. While it was once one of retails richly valued stocks, investors have been questioning whether the company can return to the double-digit growth era.

The results also arrive during a leadership transition. Lululemon announced back in April that former Nike executive Heidi ONeill is set to take over as CEO in September, with investors looking to her to revive growth in North America and restore the brands growth.

As Lululemon faces both macroeconomic pressure and brand-specific challenges, its stock has dropped around 40% year to date.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.