Why Nvidia’s terrific quarter is getting a terrible reaction
Nvidia’s CEO gave a deeply unsatisfying answer about his biggest customers’ ability to generate cash. But they might be investing more in AI GPUs in 2027 anyway.
Terrific quarter, terrible reaction.
That’s Wall Street’s read on another Nvidia earnings report that beat expectations and offered very optimistic sales guidance for the current quarter.
Shares were up as much as 4% after the release of its Q4 financials and Q1 outlook, but lost nearly all of that advance during the conference call. The stock is down 3% as of 10 a.m. ET.
“We aren’t sure what else investors want to hear at this point,” said Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon. “But we like what we heard.”
Management indicated high visibility into demand for not just this year, but 2027 as well — and they’re so confident in it that they’re already locking down the supply to be able to meet it. However, there still seems to be lingering doubt about the willingness of Nvidia’s biggest customers to enhance their multiyear capex binges, given the performance of their share prices and the pressure on their cash flow generation.
While it’s tough to ascribe strong causality, downward momentum on Nvidia shares during the conference call started as CFO Colette Kress talked about challenges accessing the Chinese market as well as rising competition from the AI players there, and then as CEO Jensen Huang responded to the first question from analysts.
BofA’s Vivek Arya asked Huang if he was confident in hyperscalers’ ability to grow capex going forward given how much their cash flows have come under pressure.
Huang said he was confident that hyperscalers’ cash flows would improve, and suggested that without more compute, these megacap tech giants would see their top lines stagnate.
“Without compute, there’s no way to generate tokens. Without tokens, there’s no way to grow revenues,” he said. “So in this new world of AI, compute equals revenues.”
But the thing about the cash flows...
They’re expected to grow for most publicly traded hyperscalers this year. And to be better in 2027 versus 2026. But the expectations for cash flow generation have been universally revised to the downside since the AI boom started.
Cumulative free cash flows for hyperscalers have been expected to be “better next year” at every point in time in the AI boom. And they never have.
It doesn’t take a rocket scientist or AGI to tell you that this probably has something to do with how much capex keeps going up, and surprising to the upside.
“The stock response suggests investors were left wanting more, which we think is tied to continued uncertainty around the growth trajectory for NVDA’s Data Center business in calendar year 27, given massively expanded capex budgets for key customers (aggregate capex for the top 5 US hyperscalers is now forecast to grow ~70% Y/Y to $650B+ in CY26) alongside significantly compressed free cash flow profiles,” JPMorgan analyst Harlan Sur wrote.
Meanwhile, Morgan Stanley analyst Joseph Moore noted that Huang’s answer appearing to be deeply unsatisfying (my words, not his!) may simply be immaterial to the company’s 2027 sales outlook.
“Nvidia believes that these cash issues will be resolved by the cash flows of AI factories being much better than expected — but that in turn requires token monetization that is also better than expected,” he wrote. “While we would stop short of believing the most bullish five year views, we do continue to think that there is no visibility to any pause in the current levels of strong demand.”
A more realistic answer from Huang might have gone something like: “I’m not sure what their free cash flows are going to, but they’re hell-bent on spending more. Look at the agreement we just reached with Meta!”
As such, we have a mediocre reaction to an objectively stellar set of numbers from a company that is not trading at an absurd valuation.
That tells us something important:
It’s a reminder that while Big Tech execs’ imagination over what this potentially transformative technology can be is boundless, the willingness of investors to buy into and fund that vision is not.
Capital markets will be the constraint on capital investment.
