Markets
Jensen Huang in front of Vera Rubin at CES 2026
(Nvidia)

Why Nvidia’s terrific quarter is getting a terrible reaction

Nvidia’s CEO gave a deeply unsatisfying answer about his biggest customers’ ability to generate cash. But they might be investing more in AI GPUs in 2027 anyway.

Luke Kawa

Terrific quarter, terrible reaction.

That’s Wall Street’s read on another Nvidia earnings report that beat expectations and offered very optimistic sales guidance for the current quarter.

Shares were up as much as 4% after the release of its Q4 financials and Q1 outlook, but lost nearly all of that advance during the conference call. The stock is down 3% as of 10 a.m. ET.

“We aren’t sure what else investors want to hear at this point,” said Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon. “But we like what we heard.”

Management indicated high visibility into demand for not just this year, but 2027 as well — and they’re so confident in it that they’re already locking down the supply to be able to meet it. However, there still seems to be lingering doubt about the willingness of Nvidia’s biggest customers to enhance their multiyear capex binges, given the performance of their share prices and the pressure on their cash flow generation.

While it’s tough to ascribe strong causality, downward momentum on Nvidia shares during the conference call started as CFO Colette Kress talked about challenges accessing the Chinese market as well as rising competition from the AI players there, and then as CEO Jensen Huang responded to the first question from analysts.

BofA’s Vivek Arya asked Huang if he was confident in hyperscalers’ ability to grow capex going forward given how much their cash flows have come under pressure.

Huang said he was confident that hyperscalers’ cash flows would improve, and suggested that without more compute, these megacap tech giants would see their top lines stagnate.

“Without compute, there’s no way to generate tokens. Without tokens, there’s no way to grow revenues,” he said. “So in this new world of AI, compute equals revenues.”

But the thing about the cash flows...

They’re expected to grow for most publicly traded hyperscalers this year. And to be better in 2027 versus 2026. But the expectations for cash flow generation have been universally revised to the downside since the AI boom started.

Cumulative free cash flows for hyperscalers have been expected to be “better next year” at every point in time in the AI boom. And they never have.

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist or AGI to tell you that this probably has something to do with how much capex keeps going up, and surprising to the upside.

“The stock response suggests investors were left wanting more, which we think is tied to continued uncertainty around the growth trajectory for NVDA’s Data Center business in calendar year 27, given massively expanded capex budgets for key customers (aggregate capex for the top 5 US hyperscalers is now forecast to grow ~70% Y/Y to $650B+ in CY26) alongside significantly compressed free cash flow profiles,” JPMorgan analyst Harlan Sur wrote.

Meanwhile, Morgan Stanley analyst Joseph Moore noted that Huang’s answer appearing to be deeply unsatisfying (my words, not his!) may simply be immaterial to the company’s 2027 sales outlook.

“Nvidia believes that these cash issues will be resolved by the cash flows of AI factories being much better than expected — but that in turn requires token monetization that is also better than expected,” he wrote. “While we would stop short of believing the most bullish five year views, we do continue to think that there is no visibility to any pause in the current levels of strong demand.”

A more realistic answer from Huang might have gone something like: “I’m not sure what their free cash flows are going to, but they’re hell-bent on spending more. Look at the agreement we just reached with Meta!”

As such, we have a mediocre reaction to an objectively stellar set of numbers from a company that is not trading at an absurd valuation.

That tells us something important:

It’s a reminder that while Big Tech execs’ imagination over what this potentially transformative technology can be is boundless, the willingness of investors to buy into and fund that vision is not.

Capital markets will be the constraint on capital investment.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

SpaceX gets a wave of bullish ratings from Wall Street analysts

SpaceX received more than a dozen positive analyst calls on Tuesday — including from major Wall Street banks — as they initiate coverage on Elon Musk’s space and AI company.

SpaceX went public on June 12 at a $2.2 trillion valuation, the largest debut in history. While the company hasn’t yet posted a profit, it seems to have convinced Wall Street that it will get there and grow its valuation on the way.

Of the at least 17 analysts that gave a rating on Tuesday, all but one gave it a “buy” or “outperform” rating. MoffettNathanson was "neutral."

The ratings come as SpaceX joined the Nasdaq 100 index, a benchmark tech-heavy basket of companies that underpins millions of portfolios. The inclusion adds built-in demand for the stock from index funds and ETFs.

Still, SpaceX fell more than 5% on Tuesday amid a broader sell-off, and is currently effectively flat from its opening price of $150 a share.

markets

Nike sinks to lowest level since 2014 after warning of “challenged” sales environment in Q4 report

Did Nike do it?

Investors had a mixed reaction after the global sports apparel company reported its fourth quarter earnings on Tuesday after the bell. Shares initially rose 5% as Nike beat out Wall Street expectations amid a hefty tariff refund bonus. However, the stock then sank to its lowest level since August 2014 in postmarket trading.

Here are the Q4 numbers:

  • Revenue of $11.0 billion (estimate: $10.8 billion).

  • Adjusted earnings per share of $0.20 (estimate: $0.12).

Ahead of this report, Nike warned that results would be flattered by a one-time tariff refund (now estimated at roughly $0.52 per share for the bottom line). That gave the company an extra cushion in snapping its streak of seven quarters of year-over-year profit declines.

Over the past year, the company had been punished by tariffs on imported goods, stagnant consumer spending, and increasing competition from other footwear brands like New Balance, Adidas, and Hoka.

Outgoing CFO Matthew Friend deemed it an “increasingly challenging operating environment, where sell-through remains challenged.”

markets

Rocket Lab deal lifts space stocks

Shares of Rocket Lab are surging after announcing an $8 billion acquisition of satellite communications operator Iridium Communications, helping lift a broader basket of space-related stocks as investors piled back into the sector.

Planet Labs, AST SpaceMobile and Redwire all traded higher alongside Rocket Lab, extending gains in an industry that has drawn enhanced investor attention in recent months in light of the strategic importance that governments place on space and satellite communications infrastructure.

In a presentation, Rocket Lab’s management called the purchase “a shortcut” for its satellite communications business.

Under the terms of the agreement, Iridium shareholders will receive $27 in cash and Rocket Lab stock, valuing Iridium at $54 per share. Backed by a $3.6 billion bridge loan committed by Deutsche Bank and Wells Fargo, Rocket Lab absorbs Iridium’s globally licensed spectrum and an active base of 2.5 million subscribers.

Rocket Lab has also remained one of the most active launch providers in the sector. The company completed its 12th launch of the year last week, maintaining one of the highest launch cadences among commercial space companies.

Today's rally helps offset a brutal stretch for the group. Rocket Lab shares had fallen over 35% over the prior month, while Planet Labs stock was down more than 40% and AST SpaceMobile stock was down around 30% over the same window.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.