Markets
Nvidia or Equal Weight
An unprecedented negative correlation

In the stock market, it’s Nvidia versus everything else

Investors wake up every morning and seemingly have one choice: Nvidia, or everything else?

What was briefly the world’s largest publicly traded company and the broader market have consciously uncoupled.

The 21-session correlation between the daily change in Nvidia and the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index is well in negative territory and recently hit its lowest level on record. The other members of the $3 trillion club have weak, but still positive, relationships with this basket of US stocks.

Nvidia and the equal-weight index have moved in the same direction in about 55% of sessions so far this year. On the surface, that might not sound like they’re behaving that differently. But the majority of the time when they’re moving together, neither is moving that much: by less than 0.5% in either direction.

What’s striking is how little they have shared big moves together. Even compared to 2023, a year when Nvidia certainly distinguished itself from the pack, the divergence is significant. 

Despite Nvidia being up 1% or more in 51 occasions so far this year, equal-weight and the chipmaker have gained more than 1% on the same day just twice. That leaves the two on track for 4 such occasions this year, versus 26 in 2023.

The good news is that they’re also suffering big drops in tandem less frequently: the pair is on track for just 11 days where both are down 1% or more this year, compared to 20 last year. A dearth of co-movement – particularly when the moves are large – is something that is critical to keeping overall volatility in the equity market compressed.

This lack of correlation is also telling us a story about investors’ most strongly held beliefs and the narratives that are driving the market at large. So far this year, investors haven’t suffered a coincident, meaningful loss of confidence in the durability of the US expansion or the power of the AI theme as a catalyst for Nvidia’s sustained operating outperformance.

The present backdrop – in which we’re seeing a moderation in economic activity and a very nascent pullback in momentum-centric stocks – appears to leave open the possibility that investors question both of these core beliefs in the near-term.

Momentum – betting that winners keep winning – has been the dominant quantitative factor in the stock market this year, even with a few gut-check moments here and there (early March, mid-April, and late May).

Even if you are a staunch believer in how much and how long AI will drive Nvidia’s bottom line results sharply higher, you have to concede at least a decent portion of its year-to-date advance is momentum-based – there’s really no “good reason” why the stock should be up 125% this year vs 175%.

Momentum can turn for any reason or no reason at all, so there’s always a danger that the nearly 2% decline in the iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF metastasizes from here.

So then, keeping a lid on equity market volatility from here comes down to investors’ perception of the sturdiness of the economic backdrop. To that end, two indexes bear close attention going forward:

The Citi Economic Data Change Index, which measures data versus its one-year average, and the Citi Economic Surprise Index, which tracks how data evolve relative to analysts’ forecasts. We haven’t had both series in negative territory since May 2023, when they were on their way up as investors shook off recession fears induced by central bank rate hikes and US regional bank failures.

But both series have been dipping sharply lately, which helps explain the underperformance of the S&P 500 equal weight index in relative and absolute terms. If we see some stabilization in either metric, this could go a long way in affirming that the “many” in the stock market – those whose fortunes are more tied to the business cycle than the AI theme – don’t face too much downside risk to earnings.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Report: US senators plan to introduce bill blocking Nvidia from selling advanced chips to China for 30 months

US senators are on the verge of introducing a bill that would block Nvidia from selling its H200 or Blackwell chips to China for 30 months, the Financial Times reports. The H200 is Nvidia’s best chip from the Hopper generation, while the Blackwell line is its current flagship offering.

Shares of the chip designer are little changed in the wake of this report, still up more than 1% on the session. The reaction makes sense, seeing as previous positive indications on Nvidia’s ability to sell advanced chips to China failed to inspire much positive momentum in its shares.

The stock got a short-lived jolt higher (that didn’t last the day!) on November 21 after Bloomberg reported that the Trump administration had discussed the possibility of selling its H200 chips to China.

Nvidia has effectively been shut out of China’s AI market in 2025. First, export restrictions meant it could no longer sell the H20, a nerfed version of its Hopper chip, to the world’s second-largest economy. After that export ban was lifted, demand from China “never materialized,” per Nvidia CFO Colette Kress. Reports indicate that China banned its leading technology giants from purchasing these semiconductors, instead pushing them toward domestic alternatives.

President Donald Trump had mused about allowing Nvidia to sell Blackwell chips to China prior to his meeting with Chinese President Xi in late October, but failed to do so. The two leaders did not discuss the topic at that time.

Per the FT, this upcoming bill would be a bipartisan effort, being cosponsored by the leading Republican and Democrat members of the Senate Foreign Relations East Asia subcommittee.

markets

AI energy plays soar on an explosion of call buying

Like their quantum computing counterparts, AI-linked energy plays are benefiting from an explosion of bullish options activity on Thursday.

  • Oklo is up double digits with call volumes above 106,000 as of 2:46 p.m. ET, more than double its 20-day average for a full session, with a put/call ratio of about 0.6. Call options with a strike price of $110 that expire this Friday (which are now in-the-money thanks to today’s surge) are seeing the most activity.

  • Nuscale, another nuclear energy play, has seen nearly 140,000 call options change hands versus a 20-day average of 51,073.

  • And fuel cell company Bloom Energy has traded nearly 80,000 calls, roughly twice its 20-day average, with a put/call ratio of about 0.3.

During his appearance on Joe Rogan’s podcast released on Wednesday, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang talked up the potential for nuclear energy, saying, “In the next six to seven years I think you are going to see a whole bunch of small nuclear reactors.”

This adds to the evidence that the speculative bid is back in a big way after smaller stocks tied to the AI boom and quantum computing cratered from mid-October through most of November as credit risk began to seep into the AI trade.

Old electronic items tossed on ground for disposal, Hudson

Technology giants don’t look like they used to, as the asset-light era fades

Oracle and Meta are now some of the most capital-intensive businesses in the S&P 500, spending more than energy giants. I guess data really is the new oil?

markets

Space stocks rip amid speculation on Altman joining race

Space stocks AST SpaceMobile, Planet Labs, and Rocket Lab all soared Thursday amid a recovery in the high-beta momentum class of shares coveted by some retail traders.

(High-beta momo stocks are basically shares that have been on a winning streak for a while, and tend to go up a lot more than the overall market on positive days. Goldman Sachs includes all three of the aforementioned space stocks in its themed basket of such shares.)

There’s little other fundamental news out there on the companies themselves.

But a Wall Street Journal report that OpenAI impresario Sam Altman has been toying with the idea of entering the space industry, potentially standing up a rival to Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s Starlink satellite service, may also be contributing.

As we’ve mentioned elsewhere, sometimes these stocks seem to trade on a what’s-bad-for-the-Musk-empire-is-good-for-us-and-vice-versa vibe.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.