Markets
Charles Liang, CEO of Super Micro
Charles Liang, CEO of Super Micro (Walid Berrazeg/Getty Images)

Super Micro sinks as Wall Street hates its trade-off of profitability for sales

Companies tied to the AI boom generally get rewarded for aggressively expanding capacity. That’s not the story this time.

Luke Kawa

Throughout the AI boom, investing aggressively in your near-term capabilities for the promise of bigger profits down the road has generally been applauded by investors.

Not so for Super Micro Computer, at least this quarter.

Shares of the server company are getting whacked this morning after its fiscal Q1 earnings report, where management delivered a much better Q2 sales outlook than analysts had anticipated, but with weaker-than-expected guidance for earnings per share. Profitability is taking a hit as the company offers preferential pricing to bigger customers and then looks to bolster its capacity to meet those huge orders, with hopes of many more to come.

“The company is placing greater investment for a strategic mega-scale AI win and expects margin to improve as it leverages investments,” Bloomberg Intelligence senior industry analyst Woo Jin Ho wrote. “This is no guarantee, as Super Micro didn’t provide a full-year margin outlook.”

When you’re selling umbrellas during a rain storm, you’re not only supposed to be able to sell more of them, but it’s also presumed that you’re able to display some decent pricing power that supports profitability.

Dell and Super Micro are both server companies looking to hitch their wagons to the explosive growth of AI. Their margin outlooks are heading in different directions.

“Supermicro received its largest design award in the company’s history, which is leading to better than expected revenue in F2Q26 and FY26,” Needham analyst N. Quinn Bolton wrote. “However, this program is expected to compress gross margin in the near term due to higher costs associated with the initial ramp along with lower margins this design award carries.”

Bolton cut his price target on the stock to $51 from $60. JPMorgan also reduced its price target to $40 (from $43), while Rosenblatt lowered its view of where shares are going to $55 from $60.

Not only this big contract, but also new production facilities that are being brought online to meet increased demand are expected to weigh on margins in the near term. To continue the analogy, to be able to sell umbrellas in a persistent downpour, you also need to be able to produce a lot of what people want to provide shelter from the storm.

During the conference call, executives were inundated with questions about the margin outlook.

“We’re going into a quarter where we are ramping one of the largest clusters in the world,” said CFO David Weigand. “We are ramping a new product line at mega scale. And so therefore, we were being a little conservative on the margin because we will have a higher cost as we ramp production and shipment.”

CEO Charles Liang said that a double-digit gross margin is still in Super Micro’s plans; it’s just going to “take a little bit longer.”

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Synopsys rises on WSJ report of Elliott’s new multibillion-dollar stake

Software company Synopsys is up 3% in premarket trading on Monday after the Wall Street Journal reported that Elliott Investment Management, a well-known activist fund, has taken a multibillion-dollar stake in the company.

Elliott’s managing partner Jesse Cohn told the WSJ that “Synopsys is essential to the global chip industry,” and that it is “uniquely positioned to benefit” as the AI industry continues to require more capital, more complex chips, and therefore, more software to design them.

The investment firm's investment is predicated on a “clear opportunity for Synopsys’ financial performance to more fully reflect the value it delivers.” While memory stocks like Micron have been on a tear recently, Synopsys has dropped 8% over the past year, lagging behind its biggest rival Cadence Design Systems, which is up 6% in the same period.

Citing people familiar with the investment in Synopsys, the Journal reports that Elliott sees room for the company to boost sales and improve its margins to be more in line with that of Cadence. In its fiscal year 2025, Cadence notched an adjusted operating margin of nearly 45%, Synopsys only eked out 37%.

Elliott’s managing partner Jesse Cohn told the WSJ that “Synopsys is essential to the global chip industry,” and that it is “uniquely positioned to benefit” as the AI industry continues to require more capital, more complex chips, and therefore, more software to design them.

The investment firm's investment is predicated on a “clear opportunity for Synopsys’ financial performance to more fully reflect the value it delivers.” While memory stocks like Micron have been on a tear recently, Synopsys has dropped 8% over the past year, lagging behind its biggest rival Cadence Design Systems, which is up 6% in the same period.

Citing people familiar with the investment in Synopsys, the Journal reports that Elliott sees room for the company to boost sales and improve its margins to be more in line with that of Cadence. In its fiscal year 2025, Cadence notched an adjusted operating margin of nearly 45%, Synopsys only eked out 37%.

markets

Exxon and Chevron surge as oil rises; gold keeps getting clobbered

Exxon and Chevron jumped again on Friday, the two largest positive contributors to the S&P 500 as of midday, even as the broader market remained mired in the red.

The two giant US energy companies are also on track to notch another in a series of new all-time highs as well Friday, and for obvious reasons.

Energy continues to be the bright spot for the S&P 500 since the start of the Iran war. (It is the only gainer of the 11 separate sectors that compose the blue-chip index, rising more than 7% in March.)

But energy’s gain has come with pain elsewhere. Since rising gas prices work mechanically as a tax on other forms of consumer spending, staples stocks have been hit hard, with the sector down more than 6% this month alone. Meanwhile, the inflationary pressure pushing the Fed away from further rate cuts continues to hit precious metals and miners. SPDR Gold Shares ETF and iShares Silver Trust futures both fell further on Friday; they’re down roughly 10% and 15% for the week, respectively, and producers like Newmont and Freeport-McMoRan also continue to drop.

markets

Investors have been drawn to software stocks since the Iran war started — Figma has been an exception

Since the Iran war started, risky assets have been in the crosshairs. Stocks have sold off as oil prices spiked, the odds of rate cuts later this year have been slashed, and even the usual safe havens like gold and silver have been unreliable ports in the growing storm.

One port of refuge, however, has been in software stocks. As noted by my colleague Matt Phillips recently, a number of high-profile software names — the same ones that some pundits doomed to obsolescence because of AI just a few short weeks ago — have held up well. Design company Figma, however, has not been one of those names.

Figmas stock has dropped 19% since the close of trading on February 27, while the iShares Expanded Tech Software ETF has gained 2%.

Though still notching very respectable top-line growth, with sales up 40% last year, Figma is far from the cash cow stage of its life — perhaps why its been hit harder than peers such as Adobe, Workday, or Salesforce. Indeed, on a GAAP basis, Wall Street still expects the company to lose $477 million this year, as heavy stock-based compensation weighs on its profitability.

Figmas pain was then compounded when Google announced a major update to Stitch on Wednesday — a product described as an AI-native software design canvas that allows anyone to create, iterate and collaborate on high-fidelity UI from natural language.

Debate is still raging on Reddit and other social media platforms as to whether Stitch, or other vibe-coding platforms and tools, will meaningfully eat into Figmas core business. One user said that it offers very little to experienced designers. It removes the tools Figma offers and delegates everything to AI. Figma at least has all the capabilities plus AI for people who want to use AI. Another — complaining about the newly prohibitive cost of credits in Figmas own AI-powered tool, Figma Make — was more bearish on Figmas usefulness, saying that the number of credits the designer would need to use would cost $16,000 under Figmas new pricing model.

For now, investors arent giving Figma the benefit of the doubt, with the stock down 12% in the last two days alone.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC. Futures and event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC.