Markets

Market Theory

IT’S NOT THE ECONOMY

“Upon closer inspection ... this link is murky.”

Money in fist
Getty Images

So why do we care about the stock market?

What we talk about when we talk about stocks.


If you read business news, you hear it constantly. 

  • “The S&P 500 has been on a tear since Nov. 1, rallying some 20% on the back of strong earnings, economic optimism, and... ” (WSJ)

  • “The U.S. stock market is off to a soaring start in 2024, as optimism over the economy and interest rate cuts has combined with... ” (Reuters)

  • Optimism about the U.S. economy sends stocks to a new record... ” (NPR)

A lot of what gets written about the stock market assumes a clear connection between rising price in the equity market and an improving economy.

I’ve been covering financial markets for 15 years at The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Axios, and a few other spots. I’ve probably included the same implicit logic in stories hundreds of times.

But here’s the thing. It’s really not true.

For a century now — since the Wall Street boom of the 1920s — Americans have conflated the market with the economy, in a mass socio-cultural confusion of correlation and causation.

It started as a freak of history. In the 1920s, the US economy surged as America emerged from World War I as the world’s top economic power.

At the same time, the stock market saw a massive boom unlike any before. Using another new technology, modern advertising techniques, Wall Street managed to persuade Americans — many of whom were enjoying the novel experience of having a little extra cash in their pockets — to buy stocks for the first time. It worked. The 1920s bull market was born. 

Then came the Crash of ’29, followed by the Great Depression, a one-two punch that strengthened the linkage between the fate of the economy and the path of the market in the American psyche. 

The thing is, economists have looked for ironclad proof that the stock market has some sort of relationship to the economy for years. They’ve largely come up short.

One of the most widely cited surveys papers, summing up all the economic literature on the ability of financial market movements to predict economic growth, said that while economists have often noted some sort of link between stocks and growth, “upon closer inspection, however, this link is murky.”

“Stock returns generally do not have substantial… predictive content for future output,” said the paper, published in the American Economic Association’s Journal of Economic Literature in 2003. 

A separate 2010 paper by a bunch of well-known economists looking at the predictive power of a range of financial indicators found that the stock market “outperformed” other indicators in prediction, but none of their indicators were especially great. 

OK, so maybe markets don’t predict growth. That’s somewhat inconvenient, seeing as they’re widely credited with being “forward-looking.” But maybe they simply reflect economic growth in real time? 

Nope, not according to a 2005 paper in the Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, which actually found a negative relationship between actual economic growth and investment returns, in a long-term study of 19 countries. That means they found stocks typically rose when the economy worsened, and vice versa.

So where does this leave us? If the stock market doesn’t tell us about the economy, does the stock market matter? Are we giving stocks too much attention? Does the market really matter?

That’s sort of like asking if sports matter. They do. Not to everybody. Not all the time.

But if you find them fascinating; if you’re interested in strategy and competition; if you have a particular rooting interest; if you’re interested in human behavior, or in mass psychology, or new trends, or great stories, they matter.

And let’s just be honest. Sports also matter to a lot of people who gamble on them. They can cost you — or make you — money. The US does have a record high share of households, 58%, who own stocks. (On the other hand, the vast majority of those holdings are pretty small. More than 90% of the stock owned by households belongs to the richest 10% of American families.)

So yes, the markets matter. Not because they’re some magic barometer that can tell the economic future. But because they’re an incredibly rich source of information and great stories about the world right now.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Intel’s earnings send fellow CPU sellers Arm and AMD higher

A strong set of Q1 results and Q2 guidance from Intel is sending shares of fellow CPU sellers Arm Holdings and Advanced Micro Devices about 6% and 4% higher in postmarket trading, respectively.

Intel's robust report is seemingly a rising tide that lifts all boats in the industry, not just a company-specific dynamic.

Arm recently pivoted to designing and selling CPUs for data center customers (like Meta!), in addition to its longstanding business of licensing out the design architecture.

And AMD, of course, has been well-established giant in the space before it ever started offering GPUs.

It’s the latest reminder that the AI boom isn’t just juicing demand for the most advanced chips, but also memory, older-school units, and a wide array of hardware.

markets

Intel crushes Q1 earnings expectations, forecasts strong Q2 revenue, shares soar

Intel shares surged in after-hours trading Thursday after the semiconductor giant reported much-better-than-expected Q1 earnings and sales numbers, and robust guidance for Q2.

Intel reported:

  • Q1 revenue of $13.6 billion vs. a consensus expectation for $12.42 billion.

  • Adjusted earnings per share of $0.29 vs. the $0.02 consensus estimate from FactSet.

  • A forecast for Q2 sales of between $13.8 billion and $14.8 billion vs. analysts’ $13.11 billion expectation.

  • A forecast for adjusted Q2 EPS of $0.20 vs. Wall Street expectations for $0.10.

“The next wave of AI will bring intelligence closer to the end user, moving from foundational models to inference to agentic. This shift is significantly increasing the need for Intel’s CPUs and wafer and advanced packaging offerings,” Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan said in the company’s earnings release.

The quarterly result was clearly a surprise both to analysts and investors. Shares were up 15% shortly after the report in after-hours trading — that despite having risen roughly 50% already in the month of April before the results were released.

Intel’s results could not be more different from the previous quarter. In its Q4 report, Intel issued lackluster guidance for Q1, which it blamed on a dearth of available silicon wafers it could use to make finished chips. The stock plunged 17% the next day.

“Intel was explicit on the Q4 call that they were living hand-to-mouth on wafers,” said Cody Acree, senior semiconductor analyst at brokerage firm Benchmark/StoneX, in a brief phone interview with Sherwood News Thursday. “If this kind of upside was possible, than why the ultraconservative guidance?”

The Q1 results are a significant coda to what has been one of the best periods of share price performance for the company in decades. The stock has more than tripled over the last 12 months.

That run-up, however, had seemed to far outpace Intel’s actual business results, resulting in a nosebleed-inducing forward price-to-earnings valuation of nearly 100x expected earnings over the next 12 months, dwarfing even the valuations the company was receiving during the peak of the dot-com boom of the 1990s. But the Q1 numbers suggest the market was picking up good vibrations that seem to have been born out.

markets
Saleah Blancaflor

The national average of US gas prices drops to $4.03

Drivers can breathe a small sigh of relief... for now. The national average gas price has gone down $0.06 since last week to $4.03 per gallon, according to the American Automobile Association.

The national average was at $4.09 per gallon a week ago.

Meanwhile, US crude oil prices have gone under $100 per barrel, which has played a part in helping drive down the cost of gas for customers. But how long the downward trend will continue remains uncertain due to instability along the Strait of Hormuz.

Loading...
 

(Event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC — probabilities referenced or sourced from KalshiEx LLC or ForecastEx LLC.)

Gas prices are currently the highest theyve ever been this time of the year going back to 2022, when the national average was $4.11 on April 23.

As we head into the end of April, prediction markets currently show traders pricing in an 81% chance the price of gas could still rise above $4.10 by the end of the month.

Meanwhile, US crude oil prices have gone under $100 per barrel, which has played a part in helping drive down the cost of gas for customers. But how long the downward trend will continue remains uncertain due to instability along the Strait of Hormuz.

Loading...
 

(Event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC — probabilities referenced or sourced from KalshiEx LLC or ForecastEx LLC.)

Gas prices are currently the highest theyve ever been this time of the year going back to 2022, when the national average was $4.11 on April 23.

As we head into the end of April, prediction markets currently show traders pricing in an 81% chance the price of gas could still rise above $4.10 by the end of the month.

markets

This chart shows how Donald Trump is the king of stock market volatility

Well, here is an absolute banger of a chart from Fundstrat that is sure to simultaneously please and annoy everyone:

Macro data scientist Alex Wang’s chart on the causes of the five best and worst market days during different presidencies demonstrates how much the Oval Office has driven US stock market volatility during President Trump’s second term in office.

Fundstrat up and down days by presidency

My very loose, abstract description of what policymakers do is “try to make things better.” (As for what constitutes “things” and “better,” well, tens of millions of Americans will have to agree to disagree.)

Most of the time, these things the president and Congress pursue are not a massive shock to the financial system, though there’s always a doomsayer warning that something like Obamacare will spell the end for US stocks. And that means most of the time, you can probably expect a positive skew: policymakers will be coming in with stimulus to support the economy and markets in the face of unexpected downside.

Per Fundstrat’s analysis, that clearly hasn’t been the case in the past 15 months. You can look at this one of two ways. Perhaps this period has been a time of such economic stability and impressive earnings growth that some of those other catalysts for massive one-day drops haven’t materialized. We’re blessed to have gotten to enjoy such a solid backdrop! Or you could suggest this is indicative of a fundamentally more activist presidency and more frequent policy decisions that carry higher macroeconomic consequences compared to previous presidencies. We’re doomed to swing wildly based on what we see next on Truth Social!

There have been a lot of wonderful studies released by asset managers on the importance of not missing the 10 best days in the market in any given year. (It’s less often mentioned by folks who have a vested interest in you investing your money about how much better returns would be if you miss the 10 worst days of the year!) The problem is that these sessions are typically clustered so close together that it’s an impossible task to navigate twisted, volatile waters so cleanly.

The upshot: Trump-induced volatility has been noise, with the biggest five losses nearly perfectly canceling out the biggest gains. There’s an underlying non-Trump, mainly AI trend that’s mattered, and that’s probably the main reason the US stock market is where it is.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC. Futures and event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC.