Markets
QE?

Investors turn towards China

China Xi Jinping Chinese Economy
Open for business! (Getty Images)

Is it actually time to get bullish on China?

Xi Jinping’s economy has gotten so bad, it might be good.

It isn’t going to make the New York Times best sellers list.

But the biggest book of the year, for investors, could well turn out to be a modest volume that hit bookshelves in late March, published by a niche Beijing imprint, Central Party Literature Press.

“Excerpts of Xi Jinping’s Speeches on Finance Work” probably doesn’t read like “The Big Short” (full disclosure: Haven’t read it), but the state-published compilation of financial directives from the CCP strongman has already caused waves in financial markets.

On March 28, the South China Morning Post reported that the book contains never-before-public statements from Xi seemingly urging the People’s Bank of China — the country’s powerful central bank — to boost purchases of Chinese government bonds.

"The People’s Bank of China must gradually increase the trading of treasury bonds in its open market operations,” Xi told officials during a central financial work conference on October 30.

For the uninitiated, that sounds like technocratic gobbledygook. But basically “open market operations” is how central bankers describe buying and selling financial assets, usually government bonds, in financial markets.

But Xi’s comments, appearing as China grapples with its worst economic challenges in decades, were seen as a remarkable hint that the the party may be considering the kind of money-printing policies — known as quantitative easing or QE — it has long avoided, as it struggles to revive its deeply dysfunctional economy.

This matters, for a couple reasons.

For one thing, it’s a sign of just how badly China’s economy is faring. While official GDP and employment figures — often looked upon skeptically by outside analysts — don’t appear too bad, there are other indications of entrenched problems.

After a massive real estate bust, demand for credit — the fuel for market economies — has collapsed. Consumer confidence is slumping. The country has slipped into deflation for months at a time. Government spending appears to be the main source of economic activity, but it requires large amounts of borrowing.

In recent decades, governments in similar straits have used central bank money-printing programs as part of a program to escape from such economic pickles.

The Bank of Japan pioneered them in the early 2000s, in the aftermath of a real estate and banking crisis that led to a recession. They weren’t especially successful at restarting growth, but the Bank of Japan doubled down on quantitative easing during the early 2010s.

The U.S. Federal Reserve also pursued quantitative easing for most of the decade that followed the financial crisis of 2008 and ensuing recession. It then restarted QE when Covid delivered another major jolt to the economy in 2020.

But beyond the economic issues, Chinese QE could also be a major development for markets, and an opportunity for traders.

That’s because, at least recently, when central banks have embraced QE, they’ve also sometimes ignited powerful, years-long stock market rallies.

A QE turning point?

Between the end of 2012 and the middle of 2015, Japan’s Nikkei 225 rose 100%, as the BoJ doubled down on monetary easing, which it called “quantitative and qualitative easing.” Similarly, in the US, between the end of 2008 and the 2014 — when the Fed paused quantitative easing — the S&P 500 doubled in a years-long romp.

If China goes that way, this may turn out to have been the moment for global traders to dangle their well-pedicured toes back into Chinese markets. It’s been a long time since they’ve been tempted to do so.

For years, a string of issues has made China almost un-investable for global money. The Trump trade war. Saber-rattling over Taiwan. The government’s ham-fisted crackdown on its most innovative tech companies. COVID-19, and China’s growth-crushing lockdowns. Its housing bust. Its wobbly financial sector. And a government seemingly less interested in growth than its predecessors.

They’ve all combined to drive a flood of foreign capital out of the country.

It could be hard to coax it back, even as the party puts on its version of a charm offensive.

To be clear, we don’t know how close Beijing is to unleashing a Chinese version of QE, or if it will go that route at all.

For the record, the central bank has repeatedly protested that, even if it were to boost its activity in the bond markets, it wouldn’t amount to QE, rather it would simply be “liquidity management.” Hmmmm.

Still, there have been additional hints that it is in the cards. Last month, the People’s Republic’s powerful finance ministry publicly supported the idea of the central bank buying more government bonds. And late last month, the central bank itself came out to support the idea of trading more government securities, adding further support to the notion that QE could be on its way.

And for what it’s worth, the markets are acting like they see quantitative easing coming down the pike. Chinese government bond prices have risen, interest rates have fallen, the currency has declined — which you would expect if traders thought China’s central bank was going to print a lot more of them — and Chinese stocks have begun to rally.

In fact, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng index which was down as much as 12% earlier this year, has suddenly gotten a spring in its step, and has overtaken the S&P 500 in terms of year-to-date gains.

That obviously isn’t going to fix China’s issues. But given the headaches the country’s leaders face over the economy, it could be a start, and something they’d like to see continue.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Margins, and selling the news: analysts look to explain Oracle's tumble

The somewhat counterintuitive tumble in Oracle shares continued into afternoon trading Friday, despite Wall Street analysts’ more-or-less favorable reaction to Oracle’s investor day presentation Thursday, where executives said the company’s AI cloud business would eventually sport margins of between 30%-40%, far better than the figures reported by The Information back on Sept. 7.

And yet, the stock is on its way to its worst day in the last six months. What gives?

Gil Lauria, who covers Oracle for D.A. Davidson & Co. — who has it at “hold” with a $300 price target — has a theory, telling Sherwood:

“Investors are disappointed that the entire growth acceleration in Oracle is from the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure business, and that Oracle expects the rest of the business to grow low single digits.

The other disappointment came from Oracle acknowledging that the GPU rental business only had 30-40% gross margins, far lower than the 80% gross margins for the rest of the business.”

Other analysts we’ve chatted with on background say they’re not convinced the margin story is the source of today’s slump, pointing to the also plausible explanation that the drop might just be a sign traders bought the stock ahead of the presentation to analysts on Thursday anticipating positive announcements, and now they’re selling simply selling the news.

Gil Lauria, who covers Oracle for D.A. Davidson & Co. — who has it at “hold” with a $300 price target — has a theory, telling Sherwood:

“Investors are disappointed that the entire growth acceleration in Oracle is from the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure business, and that Oracle expects the rest of the business to grow low single digits.

The other disappointment came from Oracle acknowledging that the GPU rental business only had 30-40% gross margins, far lower than the 80% gross margins for the rest of the business.”

Other analysts we’ve chatted with on background say they’re not convinced the margin story is the source of today’s slump, pointing to the also plausible explanation that the drop might just be a sign traders bought the stock ahead of the presentation to analysts on Thursday anticipating positive announcements, and now they’re selling simply selling the news.

markets

Analysts generally like what they heard from Oracle, but shares are down

The big news out from the Oracle AI World conference was broadly positive: that margins on cloud infrastructure can be as high as 35%, and that the company predicts $166 billion in infrastructure revenue by 2030.

And in the wake of that news, today UBS raised its price target for Oracle shares to $380 from $360, saying they are undervalued.

But investors appear to have some concerns about Oracle’s huge capex plans, which are fueled by huge AI infrastructure deals with OpenAI and Meta, as shares dropped over 7% in Friday trading.

Analysts have pointed to Oracle’s high cash burn as it pursues its AI build-out and potential financing needs as flies in the ointment that could blunt the impact of the companys strong longer-term growth forecasts.

On Friday, Jeffries analysts wrote:

Questions remain about ORCLs capex requirements to meet growing demand, as there was no forward-looking commentary on capex at the Analyst Day. Capex will need to ramp in line with [Oracle cloud infrastructure] revenue growth, raising concerns about ORCLs financing options to support this expansion.

However, if thats the reason why the stock is getting hit today, it would mark a distinct change in how investors are evaluating the AI trade. Companies have tended to be increasingly rewarded for their aggressive capex commitments to enhance the boom, based on optimism that investments in this would-be revolutionary technology will bear fruit.

Fridays dip comes on the back of a strong run leading up to the yesterdays investor conference, fueled by a flurry of AI headlines. Oracle shares have gained over 18% in the past three months and more than 70% so far this year, well outpacing the Nasdaqs approximately 7% and 16% rise over the same time periods.

markets

AST SpaceMobile drops after Barclays cuts rating to “underweight”

AST SpaceMobile, which provides cellular services from space, dove in early trading after Barclays analysts cut their rating on the shares to “underweight” (essentially a sell) from “overweight” (or a buy), citing “excessive” valuation on the still money-burning company. The fact that analysts went from “buy” to “sell” — with no momentary stop at a “hold” or “neutral” rating — makes it a fairly rare “double downgrade.”

They wrote:

“Valuation has run ahead of fundamentals... In our last update, we increased our price target from $38 to $60 as we took a more constructive view on pricing; we found it supportive that TMUS/Starlink launched a text only service for $10 per month and believe that AST products which will be richer (text, call, broadband) could see higher prices points. Since then the stock price has doubled from $48 to $95.7.”

With the shares up almost 120% over the last month through Thursday, and a price-to-forward-sales ratio of 140x — the Nasdaq Composite is around 5x — the stock might be due for a cooling-off period.

'There's nothing perfect in this world of growing apples.' Extreme weather could complicate future harvests.

The remarkable rise of the Honeycrisp and Cosmic Crisp apples

When it comes to apples, America cannot get enough of the crunch factor.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.