Power
Google I/O 2024
(Christoph Dernbach/picture alliance via Getty Images)
Hey Google!

Antitrust expert: here’s what’s going to happen to Google next

Google will probably have to ditch its exclusive iPhone agreement, but won’t get broken up.

It’s official: Google is a monopoly. 

You can read the full ruling here, but the main finding from US District Judge Amit Mehta’s ruling Monday was, “Google is a monopolist, and it has acted as one to maintain its monopoly,”.

Cornell University economics and law professor and antitrust expert George Hay also simplified it for us:

“It's 280 pages, but when you cut through all the mumbo jumbo it’s very simple: Google has a monopoly power in searches, and they monetize that with search text advertising, and they make a lot of money,” he told Sherwood. “How do they keep their monopoly? The answer is, they have exclusive agreements with Apple and the Android manufacturers to be the default engine.”

Here are some key takeaways:

It sure appears like the court will make Google get rid of its exclusive search agreements

Since this is a bifurcated trial, we’ll have to wait for a second trial to learn what the remedies will be and that will likely take years and years, Hay said, but it will likely involve the court ordering Google to do away with its search agreements with browsers and phone makers.

Through the trial it was revealed that Google paid Apple $20 billion to be the default search engine on the default web browser for iPhones. 

Google estimated in 2020 it could lose up to 80% of its Apple search volume if it gave up its default position, which could translate into up to nearly $33 billion in net revenue.

"You could get rid of Chrome and put in something else, but almost no one does,” Hay said. “The result is that they continue to be dominant, and no one is really going to crack their market share."

Google probably won’t get broken up

Despite some lawmakers calling for Google to be broken up, that probably won’t happen, Hay said.

“Historically, there aren't that many monopoly cases, and courts have very, very rarely ever used an antitrust case to break up a company. It just doesn’t happen.”

Google Search doesn’t have to be good to make money

Google knew it could make search “significantly” worse without losing revenue, according to an internal degradation study conducted in 2020.

"The fact that Google makes product changes without concern that its users might go elsewhere is something only a firm with monopoly power could do,” Mehta wrote.

Microsoft might have the most to gain

Microsoft’s Bing search engine would be the best positioned to scoop up a default search agreement with Apple if Google was forced out of its agreement, said Adam Kovacevich, a former Google executive who now serves as CEO of Chamber of Progress, a Big Tech-funded trade group.

Apple testified at the trial that it was not looking to create its own search engine business. If a court disqualifies Google from renewing that deal, Microsoft could be a lone bidder and snag it at a low price. 

“How do you force consumers not to prefer Google?” Kovacevich said. 


Bing, Google’s largest search competitor, is still a fraction of its size. In 2021, Google made $146 billion of search while Bing made less than $12 billion in 2022. Bing has about 6% market share, compared to Google’s 90%. 

More Power

See all Power
power

Report: Anthropic CEO Amodei meeting with Hegseth at the Pentagon as tensions mount

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has been summoned to meet with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth at the Pentagon on Tuesday, according to a report from Axios. Tensions are running high between the Trump administration and Anthropic, as the startup’s surveillance restrictions on the use of its AI are reportedly causing outrage within the Pentagon.

Last month’s attack on Venezuela that led to the capture of Maduro reportedly involved the use of Anthropic’s Claude AI models for planning, which caused the startup to push back on the alleged violation of its terms of use.

Per the report, the Pentagon is considering effectively blacklisting Anthropic’s AI from government work if it doesn’t capitulate to the administration’s terms.

Antagonizing the Trump administration could cause Anthropic to face potential regulatory hurdles as it races toward an IPO this year. The company recently hired former Microsoft CFO Chris Liddel to its board, who formerly served as deputy White House chief of staff in the first Trump administration.

Last month’s attack on Venezuela that led to the capture of Maduro reportedly involved the use of Anthropic’s Claude AI models for planning, which caused the startup to push back on the alleged violation of its terms of use.

Per the report, the Pentagon is considering effectively blacklisting Anthropic’s AI from government work if it doesn’t capitulate to the administration’s terms.

Antagonizing the Trump administration could cause Anthropic to face potential regulatory hurdles as it races toward an IPO this year. The company recently hired former Microsoft CFO Chris Liddel to its board, who formerly served as deputy White House chief of staff in the first Trump administration.

power
Jon Keegan

Anthropic donates $20 million to pro-AI regulation PAC

The war to build a better AI model may be mostly happening in Silicon Valley, but now another important front has opened: Washington, DC.

Anthropic announced a $20 million donation to Public First Action, a new super PAC that advocates for AI policies and regulations that prioritize public safety. The PAC describes itself as “a counterforce that will defend the public interest against those who aim to buy their way out of sensible rule-making.”

The move is seen as a counter to OpenAI’s growing investments in PACs that argue for less AI regulation.

OpenAI recently donated to Leading the Future PAC, which has received over $50 million from the family of OpenAI president and cofounder Greg Brockman, and the VC firm Andreessen Horowitz. The PAC says it is focused on “identifying, maintaining, and growing pro-AI candidates in order to support an AI innovation policy agenda at the state and federal level.”

OpenAI’s Brockman and his wife, Anna, recently donated a total of $25 million to the pro-Trump MAGA, INC. PAC.

OpenAI recently donated to Leading the Future PAC, which has received over $50 million from the family of OpenAI president and cofounder Greg Brockman, and the VC firm Andreessen Horowitz. The PAC says it is focused on “identifying, maintaining, and growing pro-AI candidates in order to support an AI innovation policy agenda at the state and federal level.”

OpenAI’s Brockman and his wife, Anna, recently donated a total of $25 million to the pro-Trump MAGA, INC. PAC.

power

Looking into its Warner Bros. acquisition, the DOJ probes Netflix for anticompetitive tactics

As the Department of Justice probes Netflix’s proposed $83 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery, it has reportedly subpoenaed at least one other entertainment company to investigate whether the streamer has taken part in anticompetitive behavior.

Netflix said the DOJ is conducting a standard review and it expects its acquisition to be approved.

Per Wall Street Journal reporting, the DOJ is also seeking out information on how Paramount’s proposed acquisition could harm competition in the entertainment industry.

Netflix has argued that its acquisition of WBD would not be anticompetitive, as there is an 80% overlap in Netflix and HBO Max subscribers. The company has said it competes not just with streaming services but also with broader content platforms like YouTube and TikTok for attention. Netflix booked $45.2 billion in revenue in 2025, compared to YouTube’s $60 billion.

The streamer has repeatedly said it will stick to a 45-day theatrical release window for Warner Bros. films. Movie theater trade groups have pointed out that after theatrical release, many films move to premium video on-demand (PVOD), where they can be digitally rented or purchased for several more weeks or months before moving to streaming (subscription video on-demand, or SVOD). According to Cinema United, the average SVOD window for major theatrical films is 102 days, significantly longer than the potential 45-day window for Netflix.

Per Wall Street Journal reporting, the DOJ is also seeking out information on how Paramount’s proposed acquisition could harm competition in the entertainment industry.

Netflix has argued that its acquisition of WBD would not be anticompetitive, as there is an 80% overlap in Netflix and HBO Max subscribers. The company has said it competes not just with streaming services but also with broader content platforms like YouTube and TikTok for attention. Netflix booked $45.2 billion in revenue in 2025, compared to YouTube’s $60 billion.

The streamer has repeatedly said it will stick to a 45-day theatrical release window for Warner Bros. films. Movie theater trade groups have pointed out that after theatrical release, many films move to premium video on-demand (PVOD), where they can be digitally rented or purchased for several more weeks or months before moving to streaming (subscription video on-demand, or SVOD). According to Cinema United, the average SVOD window for major theatrical films is 102 days, significantly longer than the potential 45-day window for Netflix.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.