Power
Vote with money
Getty Images

Election spending is set to hit nearly $16 billion this cycle

Surprise, surprise, politics is really expensive now too

More dollars are pouring into the 2024 election cycle than any other in American history. With only weeks left until election day, OpenSecrets, a nonpartisan nonprofit that tracks money in politics, estimates that total spending in this cycle will hit $15.9 billion, surpassing (in nominal terms) the ~$15 billion record from 4 years ago.

Election cycle spending
Sherwood News

Outside spending alone is expected to exceed $5 billion, thanks to spending by the so-called super PACs, or political action committees, that can accept unlimited contributions from donors as long as they don’t coordinate with candidates. Indeed, 2024 has already seen a record $2.6 billion of outside spending — a billion dollars more compared to 2020.

Having said that, when you adjust for inflation — a practice which over the last few years has become frustratingly relevant — 2020 would hold onto its record. That’s thanks in part to the huge campaign from former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg, who blew about $1 billion of his money in just a few months.

It’s no surprise that the two candidates for the White House are raising, and deploying, every single dollar they can get their hands on given how tight the polling data is. But it’s not just the presidential race where the cash is sloshing around. Running for any office has become increasingly costly since the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision, which allowed unlimited spending in federal elections and opened the door to super PACs. The 800+ candidates running for Congress across both of the Republican and Democratic parties have raised nearly $1.4 million each on average, per OpenSecrets.

More Power

See all Power
power

Trump’s deal offering top Nvidia chips to China was nixed at last minute, the WSJ reports

Nvidia’s CEO, Jensen Huang, really wants to sell the chipmakers most powerful Blackwell GPUs to China. He almost had his way.

According to a report from The Wall Street Journal, President Trump was ready to put Blackwell chips on the negotiating table for his meeting with Chinese President Xi to seek relief from Chinas decision to block crucial rare earth exports to the US.

But according to the report, Trump advisers presented a unified front and were able to dissuade him from giving up the most powerful chips to China at the last minute. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer were among those opposed to the chip deal. After the meeting, Trump said he did not talk with Xi about Nvidia’s “super duper” chips.

Reportedly those opposed to the deal cited national security concerns, as well as wanting to keep a competitive edge as China seeks to challenge the US’s current dominance of the AI industry.

But according to the report, Trump advisers presented a unified front and were able to dissuade him from giving up the most powerful chips to China at the last minute. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer were among those opposed to the chip deal. After the meeting, Trump said he did not talk with Xi about Nvidia’s “super duper” chips.

Reportedly those opposed to the deal cited national security concerns, as well as wanting to keep a competitive edge as China seeks to challenge the US’s current dominance of the AI industry.

power

OK, so when was the longest shutdown in US history?

The US government officially shut down at 12:01 a.m. on Wednesday after senators failed to agree on a last-minute funding bill. Though initially shrugging off the threat of a shutdown during yesterday’s session, stocks were mildly in the red on Wednesday as investors reacted to what is now the 11th shutdown in the government’s history.

Until this latest shutdown, there had been 20 government funding gaps experienced since 1976 — though not all ended in a full shutdown, with full closure averted in half of those cases.

Indeed, prior to the 1980s, funding gaps didn’t typically have major effects on government operations, with agencies continuing to operate on the basis that the funding would come eventually. However, a more stringent interpretation of the rules led to a stricter appropriations process from the early 1980s onward, with many subsequent funding gaps resulting in a shutdown of affected agencies (unless the gaps were quickly fixed or occurred over a weekend).

Obviously, the duration of the latest shutdown is still unclear, but it will continue until Congress passes a funding bill — most likely via a “continuing resolution,” which has ended every shutdown since 1990. Data analyzed by USAFacts suggest that it might not be a one- or two-day affair, as funding gaps have lengthened in recent years.

Government shutdown patterns
Sherwood News

Indeed, the last shutdown, which began in December 2018, ended up becoming the longest in history, at a whopping 34 days. By the time the government reopened in January 2019, about $3 billion (in 2019 dollars) had been wiped from the GDP in Q4, per data from the Congressional Budget Office, with approximately $18 billion in “federal discretionary spending” delayed over the roughly five-week stretch.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.