Power
US-DNA-TESTING
(Eric Baradat/Getty Images)

What Regeneron’s purchase of 23andMe means for the millions of people’s DNA it now owns

Experts say the deal is a “best-case scenario” in a world where privacy protections are lax.

J. Edward Moreno

A pharmaceutical company that specializes in making DNA-based research agreed to buy 23andMe out of bankruptcy, averting a worst-case scenario as the genetic data of millions of consumers was auctioned off.

Regeneron bought 23andMe for $256 million, the company announced Monday morning. Leading up to the deal, millions of consumers who mailed 23andMe vials of their saliva to learn about their ancestry worried about where their genetic data might end up, so much so that it led to a spike in web traffic to the company’s website to delete their data.

Moving the data to the hands of a pharmaceutical company rather than to a surveillance tech firm, private equity, or data brokers should ostensibly make its customers feel better. Regeneron said it would maintain 23andMe’s privacy policy, which in theory keeps consumers’ data as safe as it was before.

But that’s not saying much, according to Anya Prince, a law professor at the University of Iowa.

“From what we have heard and seen, Regeneron is more like 23andMe in terms of how they might steward the data,” Prince said. “So, in that way it’s the best-case scenario, but there’s not any guarantees in how they will do that going forward.”

For one, 23andMe’s privacy policy is subject to change at any time. Suzanne Bernstein, counsel at the nonprofit Electronic Privacy Information Center, said the bankruptcy highlights how few protections consumers have over their health data.

“When a consumer purchased their 23andMe kit, they could not have envisioned or meaningfully consented to their genetic sample being sold outside of that context,” Bernstein said. “The fact that this highly sensitive data is being sold for profit at all brings up some ethical questions.”

How may Regeneron use that data?

While Regeneron is at the forefront of genetic-based research for drugs and therapies, its most lucrative products were actually not discovered through genetics-driven drug discovery. Eylea, which prevents blindness in some patients, and its COVID-19 antibody cocktail are two of its highest-selling products, and they were not discovered through genetic research.

Still, genetic and health data is highly valuable. Advertising firms may use it to get a more pointed profile of a consumer, or government contractors could use it to track down or surveil civilians. (At $256 million, Regeneron scored each of the estimated 15 million users’ genetic data at $17 a pop, 404 Media noted.)

Bernstein said that consumers might assume their genetic information is protected under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or HIPAA, but that doesn’t apply to direct-to-consumer companies like 23andMe. Notably, Regeneron plans to keep 23andMe operating despite its dwindling sales.

“I don’t think they’re trying to emulate 23andMe’s business model; it’s more so that it seems to be an avenue to continue collecting genetic information,” she said.

More Power

See all Power
power

OpenAI is reportedly working with Pentagon to hash out guardrails amid Anthropic standoff over AI safety

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said the company is working with the Pentagon to negotiate safety guardrails for AI models used in the battlefield, which comes as one of its top competitors, Anthropic, is at a standoff with the government.

According to a memo obtained by several media outlets, Altman told staff OpenAI believes “that AI should not be used for mass surveillance or autonomous lethal weapons, and that humans should remain in the loop for high-stakes automated decisions. These are our main red lines.”

Anthropic, the company behind the AI chatbot Claude, was one of several firms that received a $200 million contract from the Department of Defense for “agentic workflows.”

Since then, tensions between Anthropic and the Pentagon have reportedly risen as the startup insists on surveillance restrictions. The government’s attack on Venezuela last month that led to the capture of President Nicolás Maduro reportedly involved the use of Anthropic’s Claude AI models for planning, which caused the startup to push back on the alleged violation of its terms of use.

Anthropic has until 5:01 p.m. ET on Friday to reach a deal with the Pentagon, which has threatened consequences against the company if it doesn’t allow the government unrestricted use.

Altman’s comments come as the Financial Times reports that executives at Amazon, Google, and Microsoft are being pushed by workers to support Anthropic in its dispute with the Pentagon and adopt similar guardrails as the Claude company in any work they undertake with the US military.

According to a memo obtained by several media outlets, Altman told staff OpenAI believes “that AI should not be used for mass surveillance or autonomous lethal weapons, and that humans should remain in the loop for high-stakes automated decisions. These are our main red lines.”

Anthropic, the company behind the AI chatbot Claude, was one of several firms that received a $200 million contract from the Department of Defense for “agentic workflows.”

Since then, tensions between Anthropic and the Pentagon have reportedly risen as the startup insists on surveillance restrictions. The government’s attack on Venezuela last month that led to the capture of President Nicolás Maduro reportedly involved the use of Anthropic’s Claude AI models for planning, which caused the startup to push back on the alleged violation of its terms of use.

Anthropic has until 5:01 p.m. ET on Friday to reach a deal with the Pentagon, which has threatened consequences against the company if it doesn’t allow the government unrestricted use.

Altman’s comments come as the Financial Times reports that executives at Amazon, Google, and Microsoft are being pushed by workers to support Anthropic in its dispute with the Pentagon and adopt similar guardrails as the Claude company in any work they undertake with the US military.

power
Jon Keegan

Report: Anthropic CEO Amodei meeting with Hegseth at the Pentagon as tensions mount

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has been summoned to meet with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth at the Pentagon on Tuesday, according to a report from Axios. Tensions are running high between the Trump administration and Anthropic, as the startup’s surveillance restrictions on the use of its AI are reportedly causing outrage within the Pentagon.

Last month’s attack on Venezuela that led to the capture of Maduro reportedly involved the use of Anthropic’s Claude AI models for planning, which caused the startup to push back on the alleged violation of its terms of use.

Per the report, the Pentagon is considering effectively blacklisting Anthropic’s AI from government work if it doesn’t capitulate to the administration’s terms.

Antagonizing the Trump administration could cause Anthropic to face potential regulatory hurdles as it races toward an IPO this year. The company recently hired former Microsoft CFO Chris Liddel to its board, who formerly served as deputy White House chief of staff in the first Trump administration.

Last month’s attack on Venezuela that led to the capture of Maduro reportedly involved the use of Anthropic’s Claude AI models for planning, which caused the startup to push back on the alleged violation of its terms of use.

Per the report, the Pentagon is considering effectively blacklisting Anthropic’s AI from government work if it doesn’t capitulate to the administration’s terms.

Antagonizing the Trump administration could cause Anthropic to face potential regulatory hurdles as it races toward an IPO this year. The company recently hired former Microsoft CFO Chris Liddel to its board, who formerly served as deputy White House chief of staff in the first Trump administration.

power
Jon Keegan

Anthropic donates $20 million to pro-AI regulation PAC

The war to build a better AI model may be mostly happening in Silicon Valley, but now another important front has opened: Washington, DC.

Anthropic announced a $20 million donation to Public First Action, a new super PAC that advocates for AI policies and regulations that prioritize public safety. The PAC describes itself as “a counterforce that will defend the public interest against those who aim to buy their way out of sensible rule-making.”

The move is seen as a counter to OpenAI’s growing investments in PACs that argue for less AI regulation.

OpenAI recently donated to Leading the Future PAC, which has received over $50 million from the family of OpenAI president and cofounder Greg Brockman, and the VC firm Andreessen Horowitz. The PAC says it is focused on “identifying, maintaining, and growing pro-AI candidates in order to support an AI innovation policy agenda at the state and federal level.”

OpenAI’s Brockman and his wife, Anna, recently donated a total of $25 million to the pro-Trump MAGA, INC. PAC.

OpenAI recently donated to Leading the Future PAC, which has received over $50 million from the family of OpenAI president and cofounder Greg Brockman, and the VC firm Andreessen Horowitz. The PAC says it is focused on “identifying, maintaining, and growing pro-AI candidates in order to support an AI innovation policy agenda at the state and federal level.”

OpenAI’s Brockman and his wife, Anna, recently donated a total of $25 million to the pro-Trump MAGA, INC. PAC.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.