Tech

ROBOT REVOLUTION

YouTube no longer requires you.

Toy Retro Robots
(Getty Images)

AI-created videos are quietly taking over YouTube

In a profound change from how YouTube looked even just six months ago, four of the top 10 YouTube channels by subscribers in May featured AI-generated material in every video.

Ryan Broderick, Adam Bumas

YouTube has never stayed still for long. 

The video powerhouse owned by Google started its life as a place to upload home movies, only to use its early scale to morph into a user-generated MTV, birthing an entire universe of homegrown celebrities. It’s since evolved in two competing directions: incentivizing longer, more professional videos to compete with Netflix but also shorter, more ephemeral videos to compete with TikTok.

And it looks as if it’s changing again. The age of AI has finally arrived for YouTube, and it could be its most existential shift yet.

Over the past few months, Garbage Day has tracked how a range of AI-generated videos have found increasing success on the platform, taking up attention and space over more professional creators. More than a few of them seemingly rely on inauthentic engagement to boost their attention — though, in a platform overrun with AI, it’s worth asking if that even matters.

At the same time, though, some of YouTube’s biggest success stories have shown less and less interest in the platform, focusing their efforts and promotion on places like TikTok and Instagram. All of this suggests a watershed moment for the internet’s biggest video site. 

In May, four of the top 10 YouTube channels with the most subscribers featured AI-generated material in every video. Not all the channels are using the same AI programs, and there are indications that some contain human-made elements, but none of these channels has ever uploaded a video that was made entirely without AI — and each has uploaded a constant stream of videos, which is crucial to their success.

While not all of the videos from these AI channels are identical, the most successful examples tend to find a theme and stick to it. Some, like “Chick of Honor,” use tools like Hailuo for the instantly established format of cute animals in visibly dangerous or tragic situations. Others, like “Masters of Prophecy,” upload AI-generated music videos for AI-generated songs, made with Suno to evoke ’80s synth nostalgia.

This is a profound change in how YouTube looked even just six months ago. In January, for instance, the most popular account making videos with AI got 2.5 million subscribers and 220 million views — barely in the top 20 for the month. In June, the top four AI channels combined to get more than 23 million subscribers and 800 million views. The algorithm clearly favors AI channels now, enough that they’re getting a much better ratio of views to subscriptions.

This does make some sense. Generative-AI-driven channels do fix one core problem YouTube has struggled with ever since it started pushing more professional video content: not every creator has the time, resources, or skills to make Netflix-level content. Google’s ad revenue split doesn’t exactly pay for the costs that come with making your channel more professional, while AI videos all tend to be a certain standard and cost sometimes cents to produce.

Generating content like this allows YouTubers to keep up with increasingly high demand from the platform’s algorithms, especially where YouTube Shorts are concerned. As the definition of Shorts has changed constantly to keep up with competitors like TikTok, YouTube has focused on their profitability much more than their appeal to creators. Starting in March, the platform changed the qualification of viewing a Short from watching it for a few seconds to any time the video starts or loops. 

According to DigiDay, this was done to make tracking engagement metrics for marketers easier, while individual creators still see the same revenue. Meanwhile, Shorts has also become a testing ground for Google’s many AI tools, whether that’s making clips with Veo or searching through them with Google Lens. Each popular AI-filled channel uploaded at least one Short in the month of May. Some, like “Chick of Honor,” uploaded entirely Shorts rather than full videos; others just made shorter clips of their videos and streams.

This all feeds into YouTube’s aspirations for TV domination, as well. A report from Nielsen last month shows that it’s maintained the highest share of all TV viewing for several months straight, and it’s been the top streaming service for more than a year. This enormous share is reflected in its profits, as recent estimates say the platform is set to surpass Disney as the world’s most profitable media company. YouTube has tried to present itself as a competitor to streaming services for years, showcasing users like Alan Chikin Chow, whose YouTube videos are made in a massive production studio. But AI-generated music channels can play just as easily on a TV without any of the production costs.

Made on YouTube 2024
YouTube CEO Neal Mohan speaks onstage at Made on YouTube at Pier 57 on September 18, 2024, in New York City (Kevin Mazur/Getty Images)

Masters of Prophecy is currently the fastest-growing channel across all of YouTube, going from a few hundred subscribers in February to over 30 million in June, and all of its content is AI-generated. But that growth looks suspicious, especially looking at how it began by going from less than 300 subscribers to more than 100,000 in a single day without any new videos, Shorts, or comments in that time. But again, on a platform increasingly powered — and populated — by AI, what does inauthentic growth even mean? At the end of the day, an AI bot isn’t going to buy a product from an advertiser.

It’s clear that YouTube doesn’t want to answer that question. In many ways, it feels like it’s hoping no one notices how popular AI content is. With a quiet misdirect, and if users (and more importantly, advertisers) don’t complain, everyone will just keep making money. 

But it also means that at some point in the near future, you’ll open up the app and suddenly realize there aren’t any humans on it anymore.


Garbage Day is an award-winning newsletter that focuses on web culture and technology, covering a mix of memes, trends, and internet drama. We also run a program called Garbage Intelligence, a monthly report tracking the rise and fall of creators and accounts across every major platform on the web. We’ll be sharing some of our findings here on Sherwood News. You can subscribe to Garbage Day here.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech
Jon Keegan

Chinese AI chatbots reportedly must answer 2,000 questions, prove censorship compliance

For American companies building AI today, its basically a free-for-all, a self-regulation zone with zero federal restrictions.

But for Chinese AI companies, the Chinese Communist Party exerts strict control over what models get released and what questions they cannot answer.

A report in The Wall Street Journal details the rigorous tests that AI models are subjected to before being released on the global stage to compete with Western AI models.

AI models must answer 2,000 questions that are frequently updated and achieve a 95% refusal rate for queries related to forbidden topics, like the Tiananmen Square massacre or human rights violations, according to the report.

The strict regulatory framework does have some safety advantages, such as preventing chatbots from sharing violent or pornographic material as well as protections from self-harm, an issue that American AI companies are currently wrestling with.

A report in The Wall Street Journal details the rigorous tests that AI models are subjected to before being released on the global stage to compete with Western AI models.

AI models must answer 2,000 questions that are frequently updated and achieve a 95% refusal rate for queries related to forbidden topics, like the Tiananmen Square massacre or human rights violations, according to the report.

The strict regulatory framework does have some safety advantages, such as preventing chatbots from sharing violent or pornographic material as well as protections from self-harm, an issue that American AI companies are currently wrestling with.

tech

Report: OpenAI has started mocking up what ads in ChatGPT could look like

2025 saw OpenAI ink a flurry of massive deals. To pay for it all, the company has realized that it can’t get there on $20-per-month subscriptions alone; it also needs to monetize its hundreds of millions of free users.

To this end, despite repeatedly denying that ads are coming to ChatGPT, a new report says OpenAI is actually working through all those details.

Citing people familiar with the discussions, The Information reports employees have discussed different ways to prioritize sponsored information in ChatGPT in response to relevant queries.

Since ChatGPT burst onto the scene in late 2022, its offerings have been ad-free, relying instead on a freemium subscription model. But with Google recently telling advertisers it plans to bring ads to Gemini next year, and with OpenAI burning through truckloads of cash, the pressure to follow suit is growing.

OpenAI is looking at its AI model-developing competitors Meta and Google, which are pulling in hundreds of billions of dollars per year in advertising revenue, to arrive at this conclusion. It’s also seemingly inspired by Amazon’s (and Google’s) idea of sponsored product placement.

Per the report, in addition to trying to build new kinds of ad units, OpenAI is considering a few options:

  • Leaning into chats that are clearly about buying a product and giving priority placement to sponsored results — though this works out to only about 2.1% of queries, according to OpenAI.

  • Showing ads based on the treasure trove of information it has on users, by mining their chat histories.

  • A “sponsored” sidebar showing ads related to the conversation.

But the company realizes it has to be careful to not turn off users, who might not trust a chatbot that peppers sensitive conversations with ads.

Citing people familiar with the discussions, The Information reports employees have discussed different ways to prioritize sponsored information in ChatGPT in response to relevant queries.

Since ChatGPT burst onto the scene in late 2022, its offerings have been ad-free, relying instead on a freemium subscription model. But with Google recently telling advertisers it plans to bring ads to Gemini next year, and with OpenAI burning through truckloads of cash, the pressure to follow suit is growing.

OpenAI is looking at its AI model-developing competitors Meta and Google, which are pulling in hundreds of billions of dollars per year in advertising revenue, to arrive at this conclusion. It’s also seemingly inspired by Amazon’s (and Google’s) idea of sponsored product placement.

Per the report, in addition to trying to build new kinds of ad units, OpenAI is considering a few options:

  • Leaning into chats that are clearly about buying a product and giving priority placement to sponsored results — though this works out to only about 2.1% of queries, according to OpenAI.

  • Showing ads based on the treasure trove of information it has on users, by mining their chat histories.

  • A “sponsored” sidebar showing ads related to the conversation.

But the company realizes it has to be careful to not turn off users, who might not trust a chatbot that peppers sensitive conversations with ads.

tech
Rani Molla

NHTSA investigates Tesla Model 3 over concerns mechanical door release is “not readily accessible or easily identifiable”

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said Wednesday it is investigating the emergency exit controls on 179,071 model year 2022 Tesla Model 3 vehicles after receiving a defect petition alleging the vehicles’ “mechanical door release is hidden, unlabeled, and not intuitive to locate during an emergency.”

The investigation is separate from a probe the agency announced this fall into instances of electronic door handles on 2021 Tesla Model Y vehicles becoming inoperable from the outside.

The action follows a series of reporting from Bloomberg examining the role of Tesla’s door designs in accident fatalities. Tesla has previously said it is working on redesigns to its door handles.

tech
Jon Keegan

FCC bans new Chinese drones and components from DJI and Autel Robotics

Yesterday, the Federal Communications Commission banned new drones and critical components from the market-leading Chinese drone manufacturer DJI and smaller firm Autel Robotics, calling the foreign-made drones “an unacceptable national security risk.”

The ban covers all drones and related components from any foreign manufacturer. DJI dominates the worldwide (nonmilitary) drone market, with a market share greater than 90%, according to some estimates.

In addition to hobbyists, the quadcopter-style drones made by DJI are used heavily in a wide variety of industries, including agriculture, infrastructure inspection, real estate, and also by first responders. Blocking foreign drones leaves many critical fields without a viable US-made alternative, as the industry has struggled to develop new supply chains that don’t come from China and match the quality of DJI’s hardware and software.

Shares of Florida-based drone builder Unusual Machines are up over 8% in early trading. Donald Trump Jr. is an investor and adviser to the company.

DJI has said its drones do not present a security risk and that it welcomes a national security review, noting that its drones can be used without an internet connection and all data is saved locally.

FCC Chair Brendan Carr said:

“I welcome this Executive Branch national security determination, and I am pleased that the FCC has now added foreign drones and related components, which pose an unacceptable national security risk, to the FCC’s Covered List. Following President Trump’s leadership, the FCC will work closely with U.S. drone makers to unleash American drone dominance.”

The ban covers all drones and related components from any foreign manufacturer. DJI dominates the worldwide (nonmilitary) drone market, with a market share greater than 90%, according to some estimates.

In addition to hobbyists, the quadcopter-style drones made by DJI are used heavily in a wide variety of industries, including agriculture, infrastructure inspection, real estate, and also by first responders. Blocking foreign drones leaves many critical fields without a viable US-made alternative, as the industry has struggled to develop new supply chains that don’t come from China and match the quality of DJI’s hardware and software.

Shares of Florida-based drone builder Unusual Machines are up over 8% in early trading. Donald Trump Jr. is an investor and adviser to the company.

DJI has said its drones do not present a security risk and that it welcomes a national security review, noting that its drones can be used without an internet connection and all data is saved locally.

FCC Chair Brendan Carr said:

“I welcome this Executive Branch national security determination, and I am pleased that the FCC has now added foreign drones and related components, which pose an unacceptable national security risk, to the FCC’s Covered List. Following President Trump’s leadership, the FCC will work closely with U.S. drone makers to unleash American drone dominance.”

tech
Rani Molla

Tesla’s EU sales fell nearly 40% in the first 11 months of 2025

From January through November of this year, Tesla sales fell 39% to 129,000 in the European Union compared with the first 11 months of 2024, according to new data from the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association, known as ACEA. In that same time, sales of Chinese competitor BYD grew 240% to 110,000. BYD first outsold Tesla there this spring, but Tesla is still outpacing BYD for the year.

Overall, sales of battery electric vehicles in the EU rose 28%.

Tesla has struggled throughout this year in Europe, its third-biggest market — something CEO Elon Musk has blamed on Europe’s lack of regulatory approval for its Full Self-Driving tech, though the decline likely has more to do with competition from China.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.