Tech
Personnel evaluation by artificial intelligence,blue background,vector illustration
(Getty Images)

Big Tech isn’t hiring like it used to, unless you say the magic words

Artificial intelligence is rewriting who gets hired, for what, and why.

When Big Tech started slashing jobs in late 2022, it felt like a brief (and painful) correction to the pandemic-era hiring binge, when Apple, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, and Alphabet collectively added more than 960,000 jobs during the peak of the digital demand boom.

Nearly three years later, however, the layoffs haven’t really stopped.

According to TechCrunch, more than 22,000 US tech workers have been let go just this year — including Intel slashing 20% of its workforce, Meta trimming Reality Labs, Amazon’s ~100 job cuts, Google’s back-to-back downsizing rounds, and just last week, Microsoft laying off 6,000 employees globally.

Looking across a selection of the largest public US technology firms, it’s easy to see that headcount growth has either slowed or outright reversed in the past two years for many.

Some notable exceptions? Netflix, which has been remarkably lean for more than a decade with just ~14,000 employees, and chip designers and semiconductor companies like Nvidia and Broadcom, which are powering much of the AI revolution.

In fact, that divergence has been playing out within America’s tech companies as well. If you’re close to the action in AI, your stock is probably rising internally. But if you’re in an operational role, administrative job, or even in a field of software engineering that’s more exposed to AI, you might not be feeling as secure.

That pressure is not just about who’s being let go — it’s also about who’s not getting hired.

Since February 2020, US job listings for software development roles have fallen nearly 40%, and IT help desk roles are down over 30%, according to data from hiring platform Indeed. That’s significantly worse than other sectors like finance or legal, and well below the broader job market, where listings are up 6%.

Postpandemic, much of the tech world’s obsession with getting lean — CEO Mark Zuckerberg called 2023 the “year of efficiency” for Meta — came from rising interest rates, margin pressure, and a reckoning with Covid-era overhiring. But now, something else is reshaping the tech job market, which some experts are calling “a very powerful ChatGPT effect.”

According to the University of Maryland’s January research, the number of IT job postings dropped 27% from the end of 2022 to 2024, while AI-related roles jumped 68%.

Researchers see this divergence as “clear evidence” of ChatGPT’s growing influence, as the chatbot’s late-2022 debut prompted companies to rethink how they build (and staff) their tech stacks — starting with the lowest-hanging tasks for machines to take over. That has only accelerated in the wake of rival chatbots like DeepSeek, Claude, Perplexity, and others.

Kanary in the coal mine?

Take Klarna, the Swedish “buy now, pay later” firm that’s been leaning hard on AI, so much so that a hyperrealistic AI-generated avatar of CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski presented the company’s quarterly earnings earlier this week. 

Beyond its actual results, what grabbed investors’ attention — or at least, what Klarna execs probably hoped would be the focus ahead of its long-awaited IPO — was a whopping 154% jump in its revenue per employee over the past two years, which reached an impressive $877,000.

Under a mixed agriculture/military metaphor titled, “Reaping the benefits of spearheading AI,” Klarna touted that it had reduced its workforce by roughly 40% in just two years.

Klarna chart
Sherwood News

The biggest cost savings in Q1 came from customer service, where Klarna replaced human agents with its in-house AI chatbot, cutting service costs by 40% since 2023.

That’s a sector that has long been cited as one of the most vulnerable to AI, with Klarna saying its chatbot now does the work of 700 people. Following complaints about its “lower quality,” however, Klarna recently said it will bring back real people — though it’s unclear how many bots (and humans) the company will ultimately retain.

Despite the slimmed-down workforce, Klarna’s net loss more than doubled in Q1, to some $99 million.

From phones to keyboards

But it’s not just about call centers anymore; AI is creeping into corporate jobs, too, the kind of work once considered out of reach for automation. As part of larger global layoffs, Microsoft recently cut ~2,000 jobs in its home state of Washington and software engineers bore the brunt of the pain, accounting for 40% of the cuts, per Bloomberg. CEO Satya Nadella revealed that AI now writes up to 30% of the company’s code on certain projects. Over at Google, Chief Scientist Jeff Dean said in March that AI could soon match the performance of junior engineers.

It raises the real question: is any of this shift showing up in actual hiring data?

To the relief of the 2.2 million software developers in the US, it seems they haven’t entirely been sidelined just yet — though AI is reshaping the rules of who gets in the door.

AI Jobs chart

According to a new report from venture capital firm SignalFire, Big Tech’s hiring for software engineering roles still grew about 3% year over year last year, while there was a 27% surge in AI hires, and less technical functions like marketing and sales fell by double digits.

And while tech hiring hasn’t collapsed across the board, early-career workers are taking the hardest hit — when the overall labor market is already freezing out job seekers fresh out of college. Per SignalFire, new-grad hiring at Big Tech fell 25% last year and is now more than 50% below prepandemic levels. Meanwhile, mid- and senior-level hiring is surging — up 27% year over year for those with two to five years of experience, and 34% for those with five to 10 years — as companies opt for seasoned engineers who can hit the ground running, rather than training juniors when AI can handle the basics.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

EPA: xAI’s Colossus data center illegally used gas turbines without permits

The Environmental Protection Agency has ruled that xAI violated the law when it used dozens of portable gas generators for its Colossus 1 data center without air quality permits.

When xAI set out to build Colossus 1 in Memphis, Tennessee, CEO Elon Musk wanted to move with unprecedented speed, avoiding all of the red tape that could slow such a big project down.

To power the 1-gigawatt data center, Musk took advantage of a local loophole that allowed portable gas generators to be used without any permits, as long as they did not spend more than 364 days in the same spot. That allowed xAI to bring in dozens of truck-sized gas generators to quickly supply the massive amount of power the data center needed to train xAI’s Grok model.

The new EPA rule says the use of such portable generators falls under federal regulation, and the company did need air quality permits to operate the turbines. xAI is also using dozens of such generators to power its Colossus 2 data center just over the border in Alabama.

To power the 1-gigawatt data center, Musk took advantage of a local loophole that allowed portable gas generators to be used without any permits, as long as they did not spend more than 364 days in the same spot. That allowed xAI to bring in dozens of truck-sized gas generators to quickly supply the massive amount of power the data center needed to train xAI’s Grok model.

The new EPA rule says the use of such portable generators falls under federal regulation, and the company did need air quality permits to operate the turbines. xAI is also using dozens of such generators to power its Colossus 2 data center just over the border in Alabama.

tech

Trump to push Big Tech to fund new power plants as AI drives up electricity costs

President Donald Trump is expected to announce a plan Friday morning that would require Big Tech companies to bid on 15-year contracts for new electricity generation capacity. The move would effectively force companies to help fund new power plants in the PJM region as soaring demand from AI data centers pushes up electricity costs across the US power grid.

Earlier this week, Trump called on tech giants to “pay their own way,” arguing that households and small businesses should not bear the cost of power infrastructure needed to support energy-hungry data centers.

Microsoft quickly responded, saying it would “pay utility rates that are high enough to cover our electricity costs,” along with committing to other changes aimed at easing pressure on the grid. Other major tech companies are expected to follow suit, though Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives warned the added costs could slow the pace of data center build-outs.

As we’ve noted, forcing tech companies to shoulder higher electricity costs is likely to hit some firms harder than others. Companies like Microsoft, Google, and Amazon can pass at least some of those costs on to customers by selling data center capacity downstream. Meta, in contrast, does not have a cloud business, meaning its AI ambitions lack a direct revenue stream to offset rising power costs.

So far tech stocks don’t appear to be affected much in premarket trading. However utility companies most levered to the AI boom certainly are, with Vistra, Constellation Energy, and Talen Energy deep in the red ahead of the open as analysts at Jefferies warn that these firms face risks from this plan.

Earlier this week, Trump called on tech giants to “pay their own way,” arguing that households and small businesses should not bear the cost of power infrastructure needed to support energy-hungry data centers.

Microsoft quickly responded, saying it would “pay utility rates that are high enough to cover our electricity costs,” along with committing to other changes aimed at easing pressure on the grid. Other major tech companies are expected to follow suit, though Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives warned the added costs could slow the pace of data center build-outs.

As we’ve noted, forcing tech companies to shoulder higher electricity costs is likely to hit some firms harder than others. Companies like Microsoft, Google, and Amazon can pass at least some of those costs on to customers by selling data center capacity downstream. Meta, in contrast, does not have a cloud business, meaning its AI ambitions lack a direct revenue stream to offset rising power costs.

So far tech stocks don’t appear to be affected much in premarket trading. However utility companies most levered to the AI boom certainly are, with Vistra, Constellation Energy, and Talen Energy deep in the red ahead of the open as analysts at Jefferies warn that these firms face risks from this plan.

tech

OpenAI working to build a US supply chain for its hardware plans, including robots

When OpenAI purchased Jony Ive’s I/O, it entered the hardware business. The company is currently ramping up to produce a mysterious AI-powered gadget.

But OpenAI plans on making more than just consumer gadgets — it also plans on making data center hardware, and even robots.

Bloomberg reports that OpenAI has been on the hunt for US-based suppliers for silicon and motors for robotics, as well as cooling systems for data centers.

AI companies are looking toward robots as a logical next step for finding applications for their models.

OpenAI told Bloomberg that US companies building the AI brains of robots might have an edge against the Chinese hardware manufacturers that are currently making some impressive humanoid robots.

Bloomberg reports that OpenAI has been on the hunt for US-based suppliers for silicon and motors for robotics, as well as cooling systems for data centers.

AI companies are looking toward robots as a logical next step for finding applications for their models.

OpenAI told Bloomberg that US companies building the AI brains of robots might have an edge against the Chinese hardware manufacturers that are currently making some impressive humanoid robots.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.