Tech
Personnel evaluation by artificial intelligence,blue background,vector illustration
(Getty Images)

Big Tech isn’t hiring like it used to, unless you say the magic words

Artificial intelligence is rewriting who gets hired, for what, and why.

When Big Tech started slashing jobs in late 2022, it felt like a brief (and painful) correction to the pandemic-era hiring binge, when Apple, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, and Alphabet collectively added more than 960,000 jobs during the peak of the digital demand boom.

Nearly three years later, however, the layoffs haven’t really stopped.

According to TechCrunch, more than 22,000 US tech workers have been let go just this year — including Intel slashing 20% of its workforce, Meta trimming Reality Labs, Amazon’s ~100 job cuts, Google’s back-to-back downsizing rounds, and just last week, Microsoft laying off 6,000 employees globally.

Looking across a selection of the largest public US technology firms, it’s easy to see that headcount growth has either slowed or outright reversed in the past two years for many.

Some notable exceptions? Netflix, which has been remarkably lean for more than a decade with just ~14,000 employees, and chip designers and semiconductor companies like Nvidia and Broadcom, which are powering much of the AI revolution.

In fact, that divergence has been playing out within America’s tech companies as well. If you’re close to the action in AI, your stock is probably rising internally. But if you’re in an operational role, administrative job, or even in a field of software engineering that’s more exposed to AI, you might not be feeling as secure.

That pressure is not just about who’s being let go — it’s also about who’s not getting hired.

Since February 2020, US job listings for software development roles have fallen nearly 40%, and IT help desk roles are down over 30%, according to data from hiring platform Indeed. That’s significantly worse than other sectors like finance or legal, and well below the broader job market, where listings are up 6%.

Postpandemic, much of the tech world’s obsession with getting lean — CEO Mark Zuckerberg called 2023 the “year of efficiency” for Meta — came from rising interest rates, margin pressure, and a reckoning with Covid-era overhiring. But now, something else is reshaping the tech job market, which some experts are calling “a very powerful ChatGPT effect.”

According to the University of Maryland’s January research, the number of IT job postings dropped 27% from the end of 2022 to 2024, while AI-related roles jumped 68%.

Researchers see this divergence as “clear evidence” of ChatGPT’s growing influence, as the chatbot’s late-2022 debut prompted companies to rethink how they build (and staff) their tech stacks — starting with the lowest-hanging tasks for machines to take over. That has only accelerated in the wake of rival chatbots like DeepSeek, Claude, Perplexity, and others.

Kanary in the coal mine?

Take Klarna, the Swedish “buy now, pay later” firm that’s been leaning hard on AI, so much so that a hyperrealistic AI-generated avatar of CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski presented the company’s quarterly earnings earlier this week. 

Beyond its actual results, what grabbed investors’ attention — or at least, what Klarna execs probably hoped would be the focus ahead of its long-awaited IPO — was a whopping 154% jump in its revenue per employee over the past two years, which reached an impressive $877,000.

Under a mixed agriculture/military metaphor titled, “Reaping the benefits of spearheading AI,” Klarna touted that it had reduced its workforce by roughly 40% in just two years.

Klarna chart
Sherwood News

The biggest cost savings in Q1 came from customer service, where Klarna replaced human agents with its in-house AI chatbot, cutting service costs by 40% since 2023.

That’s a sector that has long been cited as one of the most vulnerable to AI, with Klarna saying its chatbot now does the work of 700 people. Following complaints about its “lower quality,” however, Klarna recently said it will bring back real people — though it’s unclear how many bots (and humans) the company will ultimately retain.

Despite the slimmed-down workforce, Klarna’s net loss more than doubled in Q1, to some $99 million.

From phones to keyboards

But it’s not just about call centers anymore; AI is creeping into corporate jobs, too, the kind of work once considered out of reach for automation. As part of larger global layoffs, Microsoft recently cut ~2,000 jobs in its home state of Washington and software engineers bore the brunt of the pain, accounting for 40% of the cuts, per Bloomberg. CEO Satya Nadella revealed that AI now writes up to 30% of the company’s code on certain projects. Over at Google, Chief Scientist Jeff Dean said in March that AI could soon match the performance of junior engineers.

It raises the real question: is any of this shift showing up in actual hiring data?

To the relief of the 2.2 million software developers in the US, it seems they haven’t entirely been sidelined just yet — though AI is reshaping the rules of who gets in the door.

AI Jobs chart

According to a new report from venture capital firm SignalFire, Big Tech’s hiring for software engineering roles still grew about 3% year over year last year, while there was a 27% surge in AI hires, and less technical functions like marketing and sales fell by double digits.

And while tech hiring hasn’t collapsed across the board, early-career workers are taking the hardest hit — when the overall labor market is already freezing out job seekers fresh out of college. Per SignalFire, new-grad hiring at Big Tech fell 25% last year and is now more than 50% below prepandemic levels. Meanwhile, mid- and senior-level hiring is surging — up 27% year over year for those with two to five years of experience, and 34% for those with five to 10 years — as companies opt for seasoned engineers who can hit the ground running, rather than training juniors when AI can handle the basics.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech
Tom Jones

Prediction markets have, predictably, been given a boost by the summer of sports

Major platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket have seen huge upticks in users of late, thanks in no small part to what’s felt like a recent sporting smorgasbord, with major competitions across hockey, basketball, and soccer soaking up fans’ time (and spending, clearly) at the outset of summer.

While gaming industry groups may not like it, there’s been a huge change in the methods people are using to put money on the big games, with everyone from fortunate NYC bar owners, to a far less fortunate Spanish supporter, turning to prediction markets to try and turn their sports know-how into cold, hard cash.

According to a new report from Adam Blacker for apptopia, that shift might have been even more seismic than imagined in the wake of the NBA and NHL finals and around the 2026 World Cup kicking off.

While gaming industry groups may not like it, there’s been a huge change in the methods people are using to put money on the big games, with everyone from fortunate NYC bar owners, to a far less fortunate Spanish supporter, turning to prediction markets to try and turn their sports know-how into cold, hard cash.

According to a new report from Adam Blacker for apptopia, that shift might have been even more seismic than imagined in the wake of the NBA and NHL finals and around the 2026 World Cup kicking off.

South by Southwest Conference and Festivals

Gold Tesla Cybercabs are piling up, but they’re not picking up passengers yet

Low-volume production started in April. Now people are noticing them more and more in the wild.

Rani Molla6/15/26
tech
Jon Keegan

Anthropic pulls Fable and Mythos access worldwide after Trump administration bars their use by foreign nationals

Only days after releasing two versions of its next-gen AI model, Anthropic has disabled them for users worldwide.

Anthropic says it received a Friday night order from the Trump administration to suspend access to the models for any foreign national (anywhere in the world) — a group that included some Anthropic employees. In response, the company turned off access to everyone.

Last week, the company released to the public its much-anticipated Claude Fable 5 model (and its restricted version Claude Mythos 5, which is still being tested with trusted partners). Anthropic said in a blog post announcing the action that officials cited national security concerns with the new models, while offering few specific details.

The post said that the government gave the company “verbal evidence of a potential narrow, non-universal jailbreak” of the public Fable 5 model. A jailbreak is a means by which users can evade restrictions built into the code to unlock prohibited functionality. Anthropic downplayed the significance of the attack, and said other major models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, could also be affected by the technique described.

Fears of these first Mythos-class models being misused are running high, after Anthropic warned the cybersecurity world in May that the advanced cyber capabilities of Mythos have rapidly discovered thousands of vulnerabilities in ubiquitous software, leading to the decision to restrict the full version of the model to a close group of trusted partners for testing.

This morning, Axios reported that Anthropic technical staff have flown to Washington to meet with White House officials to resolve the issue.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the Trump administration’s decision to take action against Anthropic was prompted by discussions that Amazon CEO Andy Jassy had with officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. According to the report, Amazon researchers said they had been able to evade some of Fable 5’s security restrictions using specific prompts. Amazon is a major investor in Anthropic.

Anthropic is currently suing the US government to fight the Pentagon’s blacklisting of the company on national security grounds.

Last week, the company released to the public its much-anticipated Claude Fable 5 model (and its restricted version Claude Mythos 5, which is still being tested with trusted partners). Anthropic said in a blog post announcing the action that officials cited national security concerns with the new models, while offering few specific details.

The post said that the government gave the company “verbal evidence of a potential narrow, non-universal jailbreak” of the public Fable 5 model. A jailbreak is a means by which users can evade restrictions built into the code to unlock prohibited functionality. Anthropic downplayed the significance of the attack, and said other major models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, could also be affected by the technique described.

Fears of these first Mythos-class models being misused are running high, after Anthropic warned the cybersecurity world in May that the advanced cyber capabilities of Mythos have rapidly discovered thousands of vulnerabilities in ubiquitous software, leading to the decision to restrict the full version of the model to a close group of trusted partners for testing.

This morning, Axios reported that Anthropic technical staff have flown to Washington to meet with White House officials to resolve the issue.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the Trump administration’s decision to take action against Anthropic was prompted by discussions that Amazon CEO Andy Jassy had with officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. According to the report, Amazon researchers said they had been able to evade some of Fable 5’s security restrictions using specific prompts. Amazon is a major investor in Anthropic.

Anthropic is currently suing the US government to fight the Pentagon’s blacklisting of the company on national security grounds.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.