Tech
The Inauguration Of Donald J. Trump As The 47th President
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg attends the inauguration of President Donald Trump (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
big blue app goes red

Facebook’s news feed takes a right turn

Meta’s social platform keeps shifting what users see in their feed, but data shows an interesting postelection tilt.

Ryan Broderick, Adam Bumas

We all know deep down that Meta’s Facebook is not the cultural hub it once was. Thanks to growth-hacking influencers, AI slop, and a generational shift away from social networks toward entertainment-focused apps like TikTok, the big blue app has lost a bit of its oomph. Its algorithm has also taken a step back from the cultural conversation, deprioritizing politics and news over the last few years, even as the platform maintains about 3 billion monthly users

While news content doesn’t get the same kind of engagement it once did, users are still sharing it. In November, we wrote that The New York Times had beaten Facebook’s algorithm to become the most popular source for news on the site, though the former leader in the category, Catholic Fundamentalism, doesn’t post what anyone would qualify as news. 

In the months since the Times’ reemergence, news publishers have once again dominated Facebook, only this time they’re ideologically far different from the Gray Lady. Over the last four months, right-wing news sites — ranging from Fox News to Breitbart — have come roaring back. So much so that it’s worth asking not just why, but how?

Facebook was once so important for news that changes to the platform’s algorithms, like its infamous 2015 “pivot to video,” completely reshaped the field of journalism. But less than a decade later, the platform seems to be actively avoiding making any decisions about the content it promotes.

In January of this year, CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced the platform would be ending its entire third-party content moderation programs, citing “political bias” and planning to replace the service with user-submitted community notes similar to X. Zuckerberg also announced that Instagram and Threads would show users political news more frequently, a reversal of Meta’s February 2024 statement that it wouldn’t proactively recommend political posts.

In the wake of Meta’s new, political ecosystem, February 2025 suddenly became Fox News’ best month on Facebook in years. Data from Newswhip shows that Fox News became one of the five biggest pages on the site in February. Meanwhile, general Facebook interactions on posts that link Fox News articles have improved 30% from January to February and 44% from their preelection average. 

But it’s not just Fox News. A range of other conservative news outlets has seen just as much traffic since Election Day. In February, Breitbart News, the blog-turned-news-outlet-turned-far-right-mouthpiece that was catapulted to prominence thanks to former Trump adviser Steve Bannon, had its best month on Facebook in years, with an average interaction rate that approached The New York Times’. And this change didn’t just start this month. Per Facebook’s Widely Viewed Content Report, the Rupert Murdoch-owned New York Post has jumped from No. 13 to the No. 9 most popular linked site on Facebook between Q3 and Q4 2024, ahead of sources like TMZ and USA Today.

But the top news articles from these right-wing sources aren’t as directly political as you might expect. Fox News’ most popular story since the election was published on February 25, when network mainstay Kat Timpf announced she had been diagnosed with breast cancer during the birth of her child. Links to the story on Facebook saw over 1.4 million interactions in three days, making it Fox’s best-performing story on the site in years. Meanwhile, the Times’ best-performing story since the election was a review of the Netflix war movie “The Six Triple Eight,” with 1.7 million interactions. Other sources that saw surges in Facebook traffic were similarly removed from the election. According to Facebook itself, the most popular news article of December was an article in People about Mark Wahlberg’s Christmas card, which it says has been viewed over 18 million times.

These heartwarming, celebrity-focused stories are consistent with what’s always done well on Facebook. Last year’s presidential election drew attention to heavier political news from places like the Times. But that’s been the exception, not the rule — and that may be why Fox News has been enjoying so much popularity.

As big as these news organizations are, Facebook is just another platform for them. The decline in Facebook traffic is a relatively minor consideration; despite Fox’s huge month on the platform, overall traffic to its website declined by 6% in February, Press Gazette reported.

But Facebook is still deeply important for smaller, web-only news platforms — which tend to skew further right. Sites like Breitbart and The Daily Wire depend on Facebook for readers, and saw huge drops in overall traffic after the site changed its recommendation algorithms in May 2023. In a hostile environment, they’ve had to adapt to survive: The Daily Wire still regularly gets several times more average engagement per Facebook post than any other news site.

This suggests Fox News could be uniquely suited to take advantage of this environment. It has the size and history to look like a serious, legacy media source, but the direct connections to the rest of the right-wing media ecosystem to be able to capitalize on Facebook users’ desire for serious news in the second Trump era.

But there may be two larger trends also happening with Facebook right now.

First: it’s possible that Facebook, even with its 3 billion users, about 250 million of which are American, is simply not the mirror of the zeitgeist it once was. The users that are still active on there and actually share content are older, more conservative, and now excitedly flooding their feeds with Fox News content at a rate other platforms don’t see.

But second, it’s also worth asking exactly how organic a shift this was, especially considering Meta’s $1 million donation to President Trump’s campaign and the fact that in January the company added Trump’s close friend, UFC head Dana White, to its board.

This brings us to a question that has hung over Facebook since its inception: are the popular posts that show up on your feed actually popular, or are they popular because they’re put in a favorable position to show up on your feed?


Garbage Day is an award-winning newsletter that focuses on web culture and technology, covering a mix of memes, trends, and internet drama. We also run a program called Garbage Intelligence, a monthly report tracking the rise and fall of creators and accounts across every major platform on the web. We’ll be sharing some of our findings here on Sherwood News. You can subscribe to Garbage Day here.

More Tech

See all Tech
Multicolor Sticks

OpenAI is shipping everything. Anthropic is perfecting one thing.

The two AI titans are in a race to grow revenues, but they have very different strategies for releasing products. And one approach appears to be winning out.

73%

Here’s another sign Anthropic’s enterprise tools are killing it: The AI firm now captures 73% of all spending among companies buying AI tools for the first time, Axios reports, citing data from Ramp, a fintech company that provides corporate cards and expense management software. That’s up from 50% in January, when it was tied with OpenAI.

As we’ve noted, Big Tech is pivoting from experimentation to revenue — and enterprise is where that shift is playing out.

tech

Microsoft considers suing Amazon and OpenAI over $50 billion deal

Microsoft may be about to take its biggest AI partner to court, the Financial Times reports.

Microsoft, a longtime backer of OpenAI, is weighing legal action over the latter’s $50 billion deal with Amazon tied to its new Frontier AI product, arguing it could violate a key clause in their exclusive cloud deal requiring OpenAI’s models to run through Azure. Amazon and OpenAI say they’ve found a workaround. Microsoft executives disagree.

“We know our contract,” a source told the FT. “We will sue them if they breach it. If Amazon and OpenAI want to take a bet on the creativity of their contractual lawyers, I would back us, not them.”

OpenAI, which is eyeing an IPO this year and under pressure to generate more revenue, is trying to loosen Microsoft’s grip as it scales, while Microsoft increasingly sees OpenAI as both a partner and competitor.

“We know our contract,” a source told the FT. “We will sue them if they breach it. If Amazon and OpenAI want to take a bet on the creativity of their contractual lawyers, I would back us, not them.”

OpenAI, which is eyeing an IPO this year and under pressure to generate more revenue, is trying to loosen Microsoft’s grip as it scales, while Microsoft increasingly sees OpenAI as both a partner and competitor.

tech

Morgan Stanley says robotaxis could help Tesla sell more cars

Morgan Stanley analysts think Tesla’s robotaxi push could boost more than just a new business line — it could help sell more cars and software, too.

After visiting Giga Texas, analysts said they’re more optimistic about Tesla’s progress toward an unsupervised robotaxi rollout, with improvements in tricky pickup and drop-off scenarios where Tesla doesn’t have as much data from consumer usage. For now, the vast majority of its vehicles still have human supervisors in the front seat, but the analysts say the service is helping Tesla.

“Incremental unsupervised robotaxi miles driven improve the underlying autonomy model, which accelerates the path to personal unsupervised FSD [Full Self-Driving]. This, in turn supports higher FSD attach rates, improves auto demand, and cash flow generation.”

In other words, the more robotaxis drive, the better Tesla’s self-driving gets — and that could make its Full Self-Driving software more appealing and its cars easier to sell, in addition to improving its robotaxi service. Note that Tesla’s vehicle deliveries, which accounts for the lion’s share of the company’s revenue, have dropped two years in a row.

Morgan Stanley also sees a cost advantage. It estimates Tesla’s robotaxis could cost about $0.81 per mile to run today — cheaper than traditional ride-hailing and rival autonomous services — with costs falling further as purpose-built vehicles like the Cybercab scale.

Morgan Stanley maintained its equal-weight rating and $415 price target, about 4% above where the stock is currently trading.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC. Futures and event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC.