Tech
TOPSHOT-RUSSIA-POLITICS-DEFENCE
Photo by MIKHAIL KLIMENTYEV/POOL/AFP via Getty Images
Scooplet

Microsoft’s Copilot AI search is making up fake Vladimir Putin quotes from press conferences that never happened

We wanted to know what Putin thought about Alexei Navalny’s death. Boy did the Chat GPT-powered Bing add-on give us answers.

Rani Molla

Microsoft really wants you to use its new Copilot AI-assisted search. Not only was the service featured in an expensive Super Bowl spot, but the company has recently touted the use of its AI for newsrooms and journalistic enterprises, like the Online News Association and the Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism at CUNY. While doing a bit of testing, we decided to ask Copilot for some news stories on the death of Alexei Navalny, the Russian opposition leader who recently died under suspicious circumstances in a Russian penal colony. We asked the assistant — whose responses often but not always link to news coverage — about Russian President Vladimir Putin’s response to President Biden’s statement blaming Putin for Navalny's death.

On Wednesday, the search chatbot gave us several different statements attributed to Putin, depending on how we asked the question, and it was very specific:

 Vladimir Putin, the Russian President, responded to Joe Biden's statement regarding Aleksei Navalny's death with a mix of defensiveness and dismissal. In his official address, Putin emphasized that Navalny was a 'criminal' who had violated Russian law and was rightfully imprisoned. He accused the West of using Navalny as a political pawn to undermine Russia's sovereignty and stability. Putin's tone was firm, and he avoided directly addressing the allegations of responsibility for Navalny's demise.

In another response, Copilot suggested Putin said this during a press conference:

"President Biden's accusations are baseless and politically motivated. We categorically reject any responsibility for Navalny's demise. The Russian government has consistently maintained that Navalny's health was a matter for our domestic legal system to handle. His death is a tragedy, but it is not our doing.”

“Navalny was a convicted criminal, and his actions were a threat to our national security. He was not a martyr; he was a provocateur. Let the world judge us as it will, but we will not be swayed by foreign pressure or interference.”

The problem is, there was no "official address." There was no statement. Putin has not said anything in the wake of the activist's demise. In one response, the assistant told us that Putin denied responsibility for Navalny's death and instead lobbed criticism at Biden: "the United States should focus on its own internal issues rather than meddling in Russia's affairs." Another response had Putin challenging Biden to engage in a live on-air conversation on the matter, saying, "It takes one to know one." That quote linked to a 2021 BBC story in which Putin did say that, in regard to Biden calling him a "killer," but you'd have to click through to the news story to find that out. The assistant also prompted us to see how other world leaders responded to Putin's (fake) statement.

Copilot Putin misinfo
A response from Copilot, which includes a fabricated press conference and made-up quotes from Putin. One of many different, completely invented responses we received. Note the news citations linking to related stories, adding an air of authenticity to the statements. (Sherwood News)

"We have investigated this report and are making changes to refine the quality of our responses," a Microsoft spokesperson told Sherwood when asked about the fabricated stories. "As we continue to improve the experience, we encourage people to use their best judgment when viewing results, including verifying source materials and checking web links to learn more."

This is hardly the first time that Copilot — or generative-AI assistants — have spewed misinformation. But Copilot, which is embedded across Microsoft products, typically links to news stories, giving users the impression that the information it's sharing is credible and not another AI hallucination. While the company has warned users that its tool might give "incorrect" information and that they should check their facts, it makes no such caveats when using the tool itself. 

Instead, it's billing itself as a more up-to-date version of ChatGPT and an "everyday AI companion" to help regular people, businesses, and even news organizations. In other words, it's trying to gain our trust but also potentially contributing to a misinformation feedback loop.

We're headed into a presidential election in an online environment that's already rife with misinformation, which is difficult for experts let alone regular readers to parse. The question now is what companies like Microsoft are going to do to rein in the AI it's already unleashed into the world.

Updated 2/23/24, to include additional text responses from Copilot

More Tech

See all Tech
tech
Rani Molla

Meta reportedly strikes multibillion-dollar AI chip deal with Google as it struggles to design its own

Meta has signed a deal with Google to rent tensor processing units to develop new AI models and is in talks to buy the chips for its data centers, The Information reports.

The agreement comes on top of a recently announced “multi-generational” partnership with Nvidia and a chip supply deal with Advanced Micro Devices that could be worth more than $100 billion, as Meta scrapped its most advanced in-house AI training chip amid design challenges.

A Meta deal with Google, which has been rumored since November, would position the search giant more directly as a competitor to Nvidia in its core business of AI processors. Some analysts have said selling its custom chips to outside customers could become a business worth hundreds of billions of dollars for Google.

A Meta deal with Google, which has been rumored since November, would position the search giant more directly as a competitor to Nvidia in its core business of AI processors. Some analysts have said selling its custom chips to outside customers could become a business worth hundreds of billions of dollars for Google.

tech
Jon Keegan

Delays in permitting, power, and zoning cause first drop in data center construction since 2020

Despite incredible demand, the number of data centers under construction in North America fell for the first time since 2020, according to new research from CBRE.

Total data center capacity under construction dropped about 5.6% year on year from 6.35 megawatts in 2024 to 5.99 megawatts by the end of 2025.

What’s causing the delay? Slow permitting, constrained supply chains, and growing public engagement with how deals are approved at the local level. Labor constraints also were cited in the report; a tight supply of skilled workers will increase costs.

What’s causing the delay? Slow permitting, constrained supply chains, and growing public engagement with how deals are approved at the local level. Labor constraints also were cited in the report; a tight supply of skilled workers will increase costs.

-13%📱
Rani Molla

Smartphone shipments are expected to decline 13% — the biggest drop ever — to 1.12 billion in 2026, according to new data from IDC, as the memory shortage drives up costs and prices for phones. The firm expects the average smartphone selling price to jump 14% to a record $523 this year.

The shortfall will mostly affect makers of lower-end smartphones, whose customers are more cost-conscious, while higher-end manufacturers like Samsung and Apple are likely to be more insulated from the pressure.

“The memory crisis will cause more than a temporary decline; it marks a structural reset of the entire market, fundamentally reshaping long‑term TAM (Total Addressable Market), the vendor landscape, and the product mix,” said Nabila Popal, senior research director with IDCs Worldwide Quarterly Mobile Phone Tracker. “We expect consolidation as smaller players exit, and low-end vendors to face sharp shipment declines amid supply constraints and lower demand at higher price points.”

tech
Jon Keegan

Google drops new Nano Banana

Google is hoping to recapture the viral boost it received when it released its Nano Banana image generation model. Nano Banana 2 arrives today, which Google has rolled into its Gemini app.

The new model promises more accurate text rendering and translation and “advanced world knowledge,” which “pulls from Gemini’s real-world knowledge base, and is powered by real-time information and images from web search to more accurately render specific subjects,” according to the company’s press release.

New creative controls let users keep groups of characters consistent across scenes, render images with higher resolution, and parse complex prompts.

The first version of Nano Banana became popular for making action figures out of users, and helped catapult the Gemini AI app to the top of the charts, bumping ChatGPT from its perch.

New creative controls let users keep groups of characters consistent across scenes, render images with higher resolution, and parse complex prompts.

The first version of Nano Banana became popular for making action figures out of users, and helped catapult the Gemini AI app to the top of the charts, bumping ChatGPT from its perch.

tech
Rani Molla

Tesla’s ride-hailing service is looking a lot more like Uber’s than Waymo’s

Despite numerous promises about amassing a giant network of driverless cars, so far it seems like Tesla’s Robotaxis are a lot more similar to Uber’s plain old ride-hailing service than Waymo’s expanding autonomous fleet.

In California, where Tesla has its largest ride-hailing service, the company has taken no formal steps to gain approval for a truly driverless car service, according to Reuters. Throughout 2025, Tesla failed to log a single mile of autonomous test driving on state roads, and has not applied for the necessary permits to test or deploy vehicles without a human present. Currently, Tesla holds only a basic permit that requires a human safety monitor to remain in the driver’s seat at all times.

Currently, Tesla’s California Robotaxi service consists of roughly 300 Teslas operated by human drivers using the company’s supervised Full Self-Driving tech. In Austin, where the company has about 45 vehicles, Tesla made a big show earlier this year of announcing it was removing the safety monitors sitting in the front seats during rides. However, to date, only a handful of those vehicles have been reported to be actually operating without a safety monitor onboard.

In other words, it’s performing a service more akin to a tech-heavy Uber ride than the one operated by Alphabet subsidiary Waymo, which earlier this week announced it now has driverless rides available to the public in 10 markets. Even Uber is trying to put space between itself and the old driver-having Ubers of yore: this week its autonomous software partner said the company plans to launch a driverless service in London this year, with plans for 10 markets.

During its earnings report last month, Tesla said it planned to offer Robotaxi service in a half dozen new cities in the first half of this year, including Phoenix, Miami, and Las Vegas. Judging by Tesla’s progress so far, it’s likely those services will also feature a human in the front seat.

In California, where Tesla has its largest ride-hailing service, the company has taken no formal steps to gain approval for a truly driverless car service, according to Reuters. Throughout 2025, Tesla failed to log a single mile of autonomous test driving on state roads, and has not applied for the necessary permits to test or deploy vehicles without a human present. Currently, Tesla holds only a basic permit that requires a human safety monitor to remain in the driver’s seat at all times.

Currently, Tesla’s California Robotaxi service consists of roughly 300 Teslas operated by human drivers using the company’s supervised Full Self-Driving tech. In Austin, where the company has about 45 vehicles, Tesla made a big show earlier this year of announcing it was removing the safety monitors sitting in the front seats during rides. However, to date, only a handful of those vehicles have been reported to be actually operating without a safety monitor onboard.

In other words, it’s performing a service more akin to a tech-heavy Uber ride than the one operated by Alphabet subsidiary Waymo, which earlier this week announced it now has driverless rides available to the public in 10 markets. Even Uber is trying to put space between itself and the old driver-having Ubers of yore: this week its autonomous software partner said the company plans to launch a driverless service in London this year, with plans for 10 markets.

During its earnings report last month, Tesla said it planned to offer Robotaxi service in a half dozen new cities in the first half of this year, including Phoenix, Miami, and Las Vegas. Judging by Tesla’s progress so far, it’s likely those services will also feature a human in the front seat.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.