Tech
2025 Canadian International AutoShow - Media Day
(Mert Alper Dervis/Getty Images)

Tesla’s robotaxi will be invite-only and have drivers who are not in the car

Objects in mirror may be less exciting than they originally appeared.

Rani Molla

Tesla’s robotaxi launch is still on, but the details are a lot less exciting than they originally seemed, according to a note from Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas, who attended a Tesla session hosted by Head of Investor Relations Travis Axelrod.

Jonas wrote Friday:

“Austin’s a ‘go’ but fleet size will be low. Think 10 to 20 cars. Public roads. Invite only. Plenty of tele-ops to ensure safety levels (‘we can’t screw up’). Still waiting for a date.”

The brief statement confirms a bit of what we already knew from CEO Elon Musk about the service, based on the last earnings call, including that the program would start with 10 to 20 cars and would have remote support, but is also a far cry from what a normal person might have imagined from the “unsupervised, no one in the car, Full Self-Driving” paid public service that CEO Elon Musk has said was supposed to roll out next month.

Let’s go one by one:

10 to 20 cars: The service will start at only a fraction of the size of Google’s 100-car Waymo operation in Austin. Musk has said he plans to “scale it up rapidly” to the point where there will be “millions of Teslas operating autonomously in the second half of next year,” when the program will “become material and affect the bottom line of the company.” Musk also has a history of grossly overestimating Tesla’s future progress, and “millions” is an order of magnitude above 10.

Public roads: These robotaxis will be operating in a geo-fenced area of Austin that Tesla has been training on. That’s very different from Tesla’s stated end goal of having cars autonomously drive their owners around the country and the world. Musk, of course, isn’t advertising it that way: “Because what we’re solving for is a general solution to autonomy, not a city-specific solution for autonomy, once we make it work in a few cities, we can basically make it work in all cities in that legal jurisdiction.”

Invite only: We’ve asked Jonas for more detail on who is included in those invites and what the process is, but suffice it to say that it’s not the same as a public service that anyone can use.

Plenty of tele-ops to ensure safety levels: Musk had previously made it seem like the remote operators would be available only for edge cases. “We do have remote support, but it’s not going to be required for safe operation,” Musk said during the last earnings call. “Every now and then if a car gets stuck or something, someone will like, unlock it.” The need for tele-operators to ensure safety sounds a lot like supervised full self-driving, except the driver is able to pilot the car remotely.

It’s also a bit like Tesla’s Optimus robot, which is likely just copying a human’s exact movements rather than moving on its own.

Still waiting for a date: Musk had originally said June. Then he updated that to the “end of June or July” on the last earnings call. It seems like they don’t actually know yet.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech
Rani Molla

Rather than fully cracking down on scam ads, Meta worked to make them harder to find

In its latest piece on Meta’s scam ads, Reuters found that the social media giant didn’t just remove fraudulent ads from its platforms — it also worked to make them harder for governments and journalists to find.

Fearing that Japanese regulators would require universal advertiser verification — a measure Meta estimated would cost roughly $2 billion to implement and potentially reduce its revenue by nearly 5% — the company took steps to make scam ads less “discoverable” to “regulators, investigators and journalists,” according to internal documents reviewed by Reuters.

“So successful was the search-result cleanup that Meta, the documents show, added the tactic to a ‘general global playbook’ it has deployed against regulatory scrutiny in other markets, including the United States, Europe, India, Australia, Brazil and Thailand,” Reuters wrote.

Previous Reuters reporting found Meta internally projected that about 10% of its 2024 revenue would come from ads tied to scams and banned goods, though the company later said that estimate was overly broad. Reuters also reported the rate was double in China.

“So successful was the search-result cleanup that Meta, the documents show, added the tactic to a ‘general global playbook’ it has deployed against regulatory scrutiny in other markets, including the United States, Europe, India, Australia, Brazil and Thailand,” Reuters wrote.

Previous Reuters reporting found Meta internally projected that about 10% of its 2024 revenue would come from ads tied to scams and banned goods, though the company later said that estimate was overly broad. Reuters also reported the rate was double in China.

tech
Rani Molla

Michael Burry, the “Big Short” investor who called Tesla “ridiculously overvalued,” is not currently shorting Tesla

Earlier this month, “The Big Short” investor Michael Burry said Tesla has been “ridiculously overvalued” for “a good long time” — and reiterated that message in a post on X on Tuesday. But the once prominent Tesla short seller isn’t currently betting against the stock.

Asked directly whether he would short Tesla now, Burry replied simply: “I am not short.”

Tesla is expected to report a double-digit decline in fourth-quarter deliveries this week.

tech
Rani Molla

SoftBank becomes OpenAI’s biggest backer after fully funding $40 billion investment

SoftBank has fully funded its $40 billion investment in OpenAI, overtaking Microsoft as the company’s largest financial backer, CNBC reports. The deal was contingent on OpenAI transitioning to a for-profit public benefit corporation, which it did in September.

However, longtime partner Microsoft retains substantial influence over OpenAI with its roughly $13 billion investment, which translates to a stake worth about 27% of the startup’s valuation — which has been cited as high as $830 billion — as well as exclusive cloud and commercial licensing rights tied to Azure.

tech
Rani Molla

Tesla-compiled estimates show Q4 deliveries expected to fall 15% from last year

A Tesla-compiled average of analyst estimates pegs fourth-quarter deliveries at 422,850, which would mark a 15% slump from the 495,570 the company delivered in the same quarter last year, if realized. The full-year estimate of 1.6 million vehicles would represent an 8% decline from 2024 and the second annual decline for the EV company. The estimates are notably lower than the consensus estimates compiled by Bloomberg and FactSet, which have been declining over the past month.

The market-implied odds derived from event contracts show that most traders think Tesla deliveries will be more than 410,000 but less than 420,000 in the quarter ending December.

(Event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC — probabilities referenced or sourced from KalshiEx LLC or ForecastEx LLC.)

While Tesla typically shares its compilation of analyst estimates with institutional investors, this is the first time the company has shared those numbers on its own website. Tesla’s numbers include estimates from Daiwa, DB, Wedbush, OpCo, Canaccord, Baird, Wolfe, Exane, GS, RBC, Evercore ISI, Barclays, Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley, UBS, Jefferies, Needham & Co., HSBC, Cantor Fitzgerald, and William Blair.

Actual numbers are expected Friday.

tech
Rani Molla

Cybertruck battery material supplier writes down Tesla deal by 99%

South Korea’s L&F Co., a supplier of battery material for Tesla’s “apocalypse-proof” Cybertruck, has written down the value of its Tesla contract by more than 99%, Bloomberg reports — another sign that Cybertruck sales are faltering.

The company cited changes in supply quantities, slashing a contract valued at nearly $3 billion in 2023 to about $7,000 now.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.