Tech
2025 Canadian International AutoShow - Media Day
(Mert Alper Dervis/Getty Images)

Tesla’s robotaxi will be invite-only and have drivers who are not in the car

Objects in mirror may be less exciting than they originally appeared.

Rani Molla

Tesla’s robotaxi launch is still on, but the details are a lot less exciting than they originally seemed, according to a note from Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas, who attended a Tesla session hosted by Head of Investor Relations Travis Axelrod.

Jonas wrote Friday:

“Austin’s a ‘go’ but fleet size will be low. Think 10 to 20 cars. Public roads. Invite only. Plenty of tele-ops to ensure safety levels (‘we can’t screw up’). Still waiting for a date.”

The brief statement confirms a bit of what we already knew from CEO Elon Musk about the service, based on the last earnings call, including that the program would start with 10 to 20 cars and would have remote support, but is also a far cry from what a normal person might have imagined from the “unsupervised, no one in the car, Full Self-Driving” paid public service that CEO Elon Musk has said was supposed to roll out next month.

Let’s go one by one:

10 to 20 cars: The service will start at only a fraction of the size of Google’s 100-car Waymo operation in Austin. Musk has said he plans to “scale it up rapidly” to the point where there will be “millions of Teslas operating autonomously in the second half of next year,” when the program will “become material and affect the bottom line of the company.” Musk also has a history of grossly overestimating Tesla’s future progress, and “millions” is an order of magnitude above 10.

Public roads: These robotaxis will be operating in a geo-fenced area of Austin that Tesla has been training on. That’s very different from Tesla’s stated end goal of having cars autonomously drive their owners around the country and the world. Musk, of course, isn’t advertising it that way: “Because what we’re solving for is a general solution to autonomy, not a city-specific solution for autonomy, once we make it work in a few cities, we can basically make it work in all cities in that legal jurisdiction.”

Invite only: We’ve asked Jonas for more detail on who is included in those invites and what the process is, but suffice it to say that it’s not the same as a public service that anyone can use.

Plenty of tele-ops to ensure safety levels: Musk had previously made it seem like the remote operators would be available only for edge cases. “We do have remote support, but it’s not going to be required for safe operation,” Musk said during the last earnings call. “Every now and then if a car gets stuck or something, someone will like, unlock it.” The need for tele-operators to ensure safety sounds a lot like supervised full self-driving, except the driver is able to pilot the car remotely.

It’s also a bit like Tesla’s Optimus robot, which is likely just copying a human’s exact movements rather than moving on its own.

Still waiting for a date: Musk had originally said June. Then he updated that to the “end of June or July” on the last earnings call. It seems like they don’t actually know yet.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

OpenAI’s hot Sora video app is a copyright lawsuit waiting to happen

OpenAI has generated some serious buzz surrounding its new Sora video generation app. The app is currently No. 3 on the iOS free app leaderboards, even though it’s invitation-only for the time being.

But users have been flooding social media with videos generated by Sora, and in addition to a “Skibidi Toilet” Sam Altman and the OpenAI CEO dressed as a Nazi, the app is able to create videos featuring iconic characters from Disney, Nintendo, and Paramount Skydance.

On the system card for the Sora 2 AI model (which powers the Sora app), OpenAI says it was trained on things found on the internet:

“Sora 2 was trained on diverse datasets, including information that is publicly available on the internet, information that we partner with third parties to access, and information that our users or human trainers and researchers provide or generate.”

This seems like an invitation for a big copyright lawsuit, along the lines of the one Disney, Dreamworks, and NBCUniversal recently filed against AI image generator Midjourney.

But OpenAI is trying to flip the responsibility of protecting copyrighted material to the intellectual property owners themselves. According to The Wall Street Journal, OpenAI is allowing copyrighted material in Sora by default, unless copyright holders opt out of the service.

The courts will have to decide if this novel approach to intellectual copyright law works, but government regulators may not be that big of a problem, as Altman has made sure OpenAI is in the good graces of the Trump administration. If OpenAI has to pay up to copyright holders after a lawsuit, what’s a few billion dollars here or there when you’re raising so much capital?

On the system card for the Sora 2 AI model (which powers the Sora app), OpenAI says it was trained on things found on the internet:

“Sora 2 was trained on diverse datasets, including information that is publicly available on the internet, information that we partner with third parties to access, and information that our users or human trainers and researchers provide or generate.”

This seems like an invitation for a big copyright lawsuit, along the lines of the one Disney, Dreamworks, and NBCUniversal recently filed against AI image generator Midjourney.

But OpenAI is trying to flip the responsibility of protecting copyrighted material to the intellectual property owners themselves. According to The Wall Street Journal, OpenAI is allowing copyrighted material in Sora by default, unless copyright holders opt out of the service.

The courts will have to decide if this novel approach to intellectual copyright law works, but government regulators may not be that big of a problem, as Altman has made sure OpenAI is in the good graces of the Trump administration. If OpenAI has to pay up to copyright holders after a lawsuit, what’s a few billion dollars here or there when you’re raising so much capital?

Yann Le Cun meta AI

Tension emerges between Meta’s AI teams

Discontent between Meta’s AI research teams is growing, according to a report by The Information, at a critical time for Meta’s effort to get back into the AI race.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.